What higher education students do with teacher feedback: Feedback-practice implications

Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 419-434

  Harran, Marcelle ^a  

^a NELSON MANDELA METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857157588     PISSN: 16073614     EISSN: 17279461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2989/16073614.2011.651941     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anson, C M and Forsberg, L L. 1990. Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7(2): 200-231.
2. Arndt, V. 1993. "Response to writing: Using feedback to inform the writing process". In Teaching composition around the Pacific Rim: Politics and pedagogy, Edited by: Brock, M N and Walters, L. 90-116. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
3. Ballard, B and Clanchy, J. 1988. "Literacy in the university: An anthropological approach". In Literacy by degrees, Edited by: Taylor, G. 7-23. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
4. Beach, R and Friedrich, T. 2006. "Response to writing". In Handbook of writing research, Edited by: MacArthur, C A, Graham, S and Fitzgerald, J. 222-234. New York: Guilford Press.
5. Bigelow, M and Tarone, E. 2004. The role of literacy level in second language acquisition: Doesn't who we study determine what we know?. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4): 689-700.
6. Black, S. 2002. Whose economic well being? Reading and writing in context, London: Routledge.
7. Bloch, G. 2009. The toxic mix: What's wrong with South Africa's schools and how to fix it, Tafelberg: Cape Town.
8. Casanave, CP. 2007. Controversies in second language writing, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Charles, M. 1990. Responding to problems in written English using a student self-monitoring technique. English in Language Teaching Journal, 44(4): 286-293.
10. Chenoweth, NA. 1987. The need to teach rewriting. English Language Teaching Journal, 41(1): 25-27.
11. Cohen, A. 1987. "Student processing of feedback on their compositions". In Learner strategies in language learning, Edited by: Wensen, A L and Rubin, J. 57-69. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Dessner, LE. 1991. English as a second language writers' revision responses to teacher-written comments. Dissertation Abstracts International, 5: 827A
13. Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Fatham, A and Whalley, E. 1990. "Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content". In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom., Edited by: Kroll, B. 178-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ferris, DR. 1995. Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1): 33-51.
16. Ferris, D.R. 1997. The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2): 315-339.
17. Ferris, DR. 2003. Response to student writing: Implications for second language students, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Goldstein, LM. 2005. Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19. Hall. 1990. Managing the complexity of revising across languages. Tesol Quarterly, 24(1): 43-59.
20. Harran, M. 1994. A survey of the writing approaches followed by ESL teachers in Port Elizabeth secondary schools where Afrikaans is the first language. MEd (ESL) course-work thesis, Rhodes University.
21. Harran, M. 1999. Feedback: A change agent on ESL writing attitude and performance?. Protechnida Bulletin, 16(1): 27-55.
22. Harran, M, Knott, A and Weir, C. 2011. Responding electronically to student drafts on campus: Encouraging or discouraging dialogue?. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(7): 1359-1377.
23. Hedgecock, J and Lefkowitz, N. 1994. Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity in second language learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2): 141-163.
24. Hillocks, G. Jr. 1986. "Research on written composition: New directions for teaching". In ERIC Clearing house on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English, IL: Urbana.
25. Hinkel, E. 2003. Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2): 275-301.
26. Hinkel, E. 2004. Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and Grammar., London: LEA Publishers.
27. Hounsell, D. 1987. "Essay writing and the quality of feedback". In Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology., Edited by: Richardson, J TE, Eysenck, M W and Warren-Piper, D. 109-119. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
28. Hyland, K. 1990. Providing productive feedback. English Language Teaching Journal, 44(4): 279-285.
29. Hyland, K. 1992. Genre analysis: Just another fad?. English Teaching Forum, 30(2): 14-18.
30. Hyland, K. 2002. Teaching and researching writing, Great Britain: Pearson Education.
31. Keh, CL. 1990a. A design for a process-approach writing course. English Teaching Forum, 28(1): 10-11.
32. Keh, CL. 1990b. Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. English Language Teaching Journal, 44(4): 294-304.
33. Krashen, SD. 1984. Writing: Research, theory and applications, Oxford: Pergamon.
34. Langer, J A and Applebee, A N. 1984. "Language, learning and interaction: A framework for improving the teaching of writing". In Contexts for learning to write, Edited by: Applebee, A N. 167-193. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
35. Lee, G and Schallert, D L. 2008. Constructing trust between teacher and students through feedback and revision cycles in an EFL writing classroom. Written Communication, 25(4): 506-537.
36. Lees, EO. 1979. Evaluating student writing. College Composition and Communication, 30(4): 370-374.
37. Leki, I. 1990. "Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response". In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, Edited by: Kroll, B. 57-68. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Leki, I. 1991. Teaching second language writing: Where we seem to be. English Teaching Forum, 28(1): 2-4.
39. McCurdy. 1992. What students do with composition feedback. Paper presented at the 27th Annual TESOL convention Vancouver, BC
40. Murphey, T, Falout, J, Elwood, J and Hood, M. 2009. Inviting student voice. Asian EFL Journal, 36: 1-25. Available at: http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/pta_Mayl_2009_tm.php[accessed 10 December 2010], Professional Teaching Articles
41. Murray, S and Johanson, L. 1990. Write to improve: A guide to correcting and evaluating written work, South Africa: Hodder & Stroughton Education.
42. Myles, J. 2002. Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 6(2): 1-20.
43. Nielsen, JM. 1990. Feminist research methods, Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
44. Pardoe, S. 2000. "Respect and the pursuit of 'symmetry' in researching literacy and student writing". In Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context, Edited by: Barton, D, Hamilton, M and Ivanić, R. 149-166. London: Routledge.
45. Parks, S. 2002. Moving from school to the workplace: Disciplinary innovation, border crossings and the shaping of a written genre. Applied Linguistics, 22(4): 405-438.
46. Paxton, M. 1995. Tutor responses to student writing. South African Journal of Higher Education, 9(1): 189-198.
47. Pratt, DD. 1990. The student as materials writer. English Teaching Forum, 27(1): 6-9.
48. Prinsloo, M and Breier, M. 1996. The social uses of literacy: Theory and practice in contemporary South Africa, Cape Town: Sached Books.
49. Prior, P. 1991. Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8(3): 267-310.
50. Raimes, A. 1991. Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3): 407-423.
51. Reid, J. 1994. Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2): 273-292.
52. Saito, H. 1994. Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. Teaching English as a Second Language Canada Journal, 11(2): 46-68.
53. Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and social science, USA: Sage.
54. Schecter, S R and Bayley, R. 1997. Language socialisation practices and cultural identity: Case studies of Mexican-descent families in California and Texas. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3): 513-542.
55. Silva, T. 1993. Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4): 657-671.
56. Silva, T and Matsuda, PK. 2001. On second language writing, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
57. Sommers, N. 1982. "Responding to student writing". In Composing in SL, Edited by: McKay, S. 160-169. USA: Newbury House Publishers. 1984
58. Taylor, BP. 1981. Content and written form: A two-way street. TESOL Quarterly, 15(1): 5-13.
59. Thesen, L. 1997. Voices, discourse, and transition: In search of new categories in EAP. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3): 487-511.
60. Townsend, RA. 2010. The National Curriculum Statement on writing practice design for Grades 11 and 12: Implications for academic writing in Higher Education, MA dissertation: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.
61. Van Wyk, A. 2003. Access to higher education in South Africa: Bridging the divide through academic literacy. TESOL Journal, 12(3): 29-34.
62. Yagelski, R. 1995. The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 29: 216-338.
63. Zamel, V. 1982. Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2): 195-210.
64. Zamel, V. 1985. Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1): 79-101.
65. Zamel, V. 1987. Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4): 697-711.