Naïve realism and capturing the "wisdom of dyads"

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 507-512

  Liberman, Varda ^a   Minson, Julia A ^b   Bryan, Christopher J ^c   Ross, Lee ^c  

^a INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advice taking; Attributional bias; Group decision making; Judgment aggregation; Social influence; Underweighting peer input

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857142367     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bonaccio S., Dalal R.S. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006, 101:127-151.
2. Ferstinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1957, Stanford University Press.
3. Harvey N., Fischer I. Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997, 70:117-133.
4. Harvey N., Harries C. Effects of judges' forecasting on their later combination of forecasts for the same outcomes. International Journal of Forecasting 2004, 20:391-409.
5. Ichheiser G. Misunderstandings in human relations: A study in false social perception 1949, University of Chicago Press.
6. Ichheiser G. Misunderstandings in international relations. American Sociological Review 1951, 16:311-316.
7. Krueger J.L. Return of the ego-self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review 2003, 110:585-590.
8. Krueger J., Clement R.W. The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67(4):596-610.
9. Larrick R.P., Soll J.B. Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Science 2006, 52:111-127.
10. Lim J.S., O'Connor M. Judgmental adjustment of initial forecasts: Its effectiveness and biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1995, 8:149-168.
11. Lord C.G., Lepper M.R., Ross L. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37(11):2098-2109.
12. Lorge I., Fox D., Davitz J., Brenner M. A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance 1920-1957. Psychological Bulletin 1958, 55:337-372.
13. Marks G., Miller N. Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 1987, 102(1):72-90.
14. Mullen B., Atkins J.L., Champions D.S., Edwards C., Hardy D., Story J.E., Vanderklok M. The False Consensus Effect: A meta-analysis of 155 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1985, 21:262-283.
15. Pronin E., Lin D.Y., Ross L. The bias blindspot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:369-381.
16. Pronin E., Gilovich T., Ross L. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review 2004, 111:781-799.
17. Ross L., Greene D., House P. The "False Consensus Effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1977, 13:279-301.
18. Ross L., Ward A. Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. Advances in experimental social psychology 1995, vol. 27:255-304. Academic Press, San Diego.
19. Ross L., Ward A. Naïve realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. The Jean Piaget symposium series 1996, 103-135. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, England. E.S. Reed, E. Turiel, T. Brown (Eds.).
20. Ross L., Lepper M., Ward A. History of social psychology: Insights, challenges and contributions to theory and application. The handbook of social psychology 2010, 3-50. Wiley, New York. 5th ed. S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
21. Selig J.P., Preacher K.J. Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software] Available from. http://quantpsy.org/.
22. Soll J.B., Larrick R.P. Strategies for revising judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:780-805.
23. Soll J.B., Mannes A.E. Judgmental aggregation strategies depend on whether the self is involved. International Journal of Forecasting 2011, 27:81-102.
24. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations 2004, Doubleday.
25. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
26. Yaniv I. Receiving other people's advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2004, 93:1-13.
27. Yaniv I., Kleinberger E. Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000, 83:260-281.