Facial age after-effects show partial identity invariance and transfer from hands to faces

Cortex

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 477-486

  Lai, Michelle ^a   Oruç, Ipek ^a   Barton, Jason J S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Face perception; Modality

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; FACIAL AGE AFTER EFFECT; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARTIAL FACE IDENTITY INVARIANCE; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOICE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL PERCEPTION; VOICE;

EID: 84857140439     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson J.S., Lampl I., Gillespie D.C., Ferster D. The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex. Science 2000, 290(5498):1968-1972.
2. Anderson N.D., Wilson H.R. The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Research 2005, 45(14):1815-1828.
3. Anstis S., Verstraten A.J., Mather G. The motion aftereffect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2(3):111-117.
4. Bahrick H.P., Bahrick P.O., Wittlinger R.P. Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 1975, 104(1):54-75.
5. Blakemore C., Campbell F.W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology 1969, 203(1):237-260.
6. Bracci S., Ietswaart M., Peelen M.V., Cavina-Pratesi C. Dissociable neural responses to hands and non-hand body parts in human left extrastriate visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103(6):3389-3397.
7. Bruce V., Young A. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1986, 77:305-327.
8. Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Perception of age in adult caucasian male faces: Computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information. Proceedings of the Biological Sciences 1995, 259(1355):137-143.
9. Butler A., Oruc I., Fox C.J., Barton J.J. Factors contributing to the adaptation aftereffects of facial expression. Brain Research 2008, 1191:116-126.
10. Campbell J., Burke D. Evidence that identity-dependent and identity-independent neural populations are recruited in the perception of five basic emotional facial expressions. Vision Research 2009, 49(12):1532-1540.
11. Coltheart M. Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review 1971, 78(2):114-121.
12. Davidenko N. Silhouetted face profiles: A new methodology for face perception research. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(4):6.
13. Fang F., He S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 2005, 45(5):793-800.
14. Fedok F.G. The aging face. Facial Plastic Surgery 1996, 12(2):107-115.
15. Fox C.J., Barton J.J.S. What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research 2007, 1127:80-89.
16. Fox C.J., Moon S.-Y., Iaria G., Barton J.J.S. The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study. NeuroImage 2009, 44:569-580.
17. Fox C.J., Oruç I., Barton J.J. It doesn't matter how you feel. The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(3):11.1-1113.
18. George P.A., Hole G.J. Factors influencing the accuracy of age estimates of unfamiliar faces. Perception 1995, 24(9):1059-1073.
19. Ghuman A.S., McDaniel J.R., Martin A. Face adaptation without a face. Current Biology 2010, 20(1):32-36.
20. Gibson J.J., Radner M. Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1937, 20:453-467.
21. Gobbini M.I., Haxby J.V. Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(1):32-41.
22. Guo X.M., Oruc I., Barton J.J. Cross-orientation transfer of adaptation for facial identity is asymmetric: A study using contrast-based recognition thresholds. Vision Research 2009, 49(18):2254-2260.
23. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(6):223-233.
24. Iaria G., Fox C.J., Waite C., Aharon I., Barton J.J.S. The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence. Neuroscience 2008, 155:409-422.
25. Jain A., Sally S.L., Papathomas T.V. Audiovisual short-term influences and aftereffects in motion: Examination across three sets of directional pairings. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(15):7.1-713.
26. Jaquet E., Rhodes G. Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(1):101-112.
27. Jeffery L., Rhodes G., Busey T. View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science 2006, 17(6):501-505.
28. Jenkins R., Beaver J.D., Calder A.J. I thought you were looking at me: Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychological Science 2006, 17(6):506-513.
29. Jiang F., Blanz V., O'Toole A.J. The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view-transferability of face identity adaptation. Vision Research 2007, 47(4):525-531.
30. Kitagawa N., Ichihara S. Hearing visual motion in depth. Nature 2002, 416(6877):172-174.
31. Kloth N., Schweinberger S.R., Kovacs G. Neural correlates of generic versus gender-specific face adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(10):2345-2356.
32. Kovacs G., Zimmer M., Banko E., Harza I., Antal A., Vidnyanszky Z. Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16(5):742-753.
33. Kwon Y.H., de Vitoria Lobo N. Age classification from facial images. Computer Vision Image Understanding 1999, 74:1-21.
34. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(1):89-94.
35. Little A.C., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C. Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Biological Sciences 2005, 272(1578):2283-2287.
36. Maeda F., Kanai R., Shimojo S. Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion. Current Biology 2004, 14(23):R990-R991.
37. Mather G. The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception 1980, 9(4):379-392.
38. Maunsell J.H., Van Essen D.C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology 1983, 49(5):1127-1147.
39. Meyer G.F., Wuerger S.M. Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. NeuroReport 2001, 12(11):2557-2560.
40. Moradi F., Koch C., Shimojo S. Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 2005, 45(1):169-175.
41. O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Volz H., Salter E.M. Three-dimensional caricatures of human heads: Distinctiveness and the perception of facial age. Perception 1997, 26(6):719-732.
42. Oruç I., Barton J.J. A novel face aftereffect based on recognition contrast thresholds. Vision Research 2010, 50(18):1845-1854.
43. Perrett D.I., Oram M.W., Harries M.H., Bevan R., Hietanen J.K., Benson P.J., et al. Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1991, 86(1):159-173.
44. Rosen E. Face Representation in Cortex. Studies using a Simple and not so Special Model 2003, vol. 75. Secondary Titl, MIT, Cambridge.
45. Sankoh A.J., Huque M.F., Dubey S.D. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustments methods in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 1997, 16:2529-2542.
46. Schwarzlose R.F., Baker C.I., Kanwisher N. Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(47):11055-11059.
47. Schweinberger S.R., Casper C., Hauthal N., Kaufmann J.M., Kawahara H., Kloth N., et al. Auditory adaptation in voice perception. Current Biology 2008, 18(9):684-688.
48. Schweinberger S.R., Zaske R., Walther C., Golle J., Kovacs G., Wiese H. Young without plastic surgery: Perceptual adaptation to the age of female and male faces. Vision Research 2010, 50(23):2570-2576.
49. Sergent J., Poncet M. From covert to overt recognition of faces in a prosopagnosic patient. Brain 1990, 113:989-1004.
50. Vida M.D., Mondloch C.J. Children's representations of facial expression and identity: Identity-contingent expression aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2009, 104(3):326-345.
51. Wallace M.T., Wilkinson L.K., Stein B.E. Representation and integration of multiple sensory inputs in primate superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76(2):1246-1266.
52. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428(6982):557-561.
53. Winston J.S., Henson R.N., Fine-Goulden M.R., Dolan R.J. fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 92(3):1830-1839.
54. Zaske R., Schweinberger S.R., Kawahara H. Voice aftereffects of adaptation to speaker identity. Hear Research 2010, 268(1-2):38-45.
55. Zhao L., Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research 2001, 41(23):2979-2994.