The Influence of Mapped Hazards on Risk Beliefs: A Proximity-Based Modeling Approach

Risk Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 259-280

  Severtson, Dolores J ^a   Burt, James E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Hazard proximity; Map cognition; Perceived risk; Risk communication; Visual communication

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENT VARIABLES; DOT PATTERNS; ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; MAP LOCATION; MODELING APPROACH; PERCEIVED RISK; RESIDENTIAL WELLS; RISK COMMUNICATION; STUDY SAMPLES; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS; WATER TESTS;

HAZARDS; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; RISK PERCEPTION; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MAP; NUMERICAL MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; STUDENT; VISUAL ANALYSIS; WALL;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STUDENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS;

EID: 84857116360     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01700.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Lahr J, Kooistra L. Environmental risk mapping of pollutants: State of the art and communication aspects. Science of the Total Environment, 2010; 408(18):3899-3907.
2. The Royal Society. Risk: Analysis, Perception, Management. London : Royal Society, 1992.
3. National Research Council. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 1996.
4. Severtson DJ, Vatovec C. The theory-based influence of map features on risk beliefs: Self-reports of what is seen and understood for maps depicting an environmental health hazard. Journal of Health Communication, In press. Preprint available at
5. Slocum TA. Thematic Cartography and Geographic Visualization, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall, 2009.
6. Brody SD, Highfield W, Alston L. Does location matter?: Measuring environmental perceptions of creeks in two San Antonio watersheds. Environment and Behavior, 2004; 36(2):229-250.
7. Lindell MK, Hwang SN. Households' perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Analysis, 2008; 28(2):539-556.
8. Poortinga W, Cox P, Pidgeon NF. The perceived health risks of indoor radon gas and overhead powerlines: A comparative multilevel approach. Risk Analysis, 2008; 28(1):235-248.
9. Zhang Y, Prater CS, Lindell MK. Risk area accuracy and evacuation from Hurricane Bret. Natural Hazards Review, 2004; 5(3):115-120.
10. Arlikatti S, Lindell MK, Prater CS, Zhang Y. Risk area accuracy and hurricane evacuation expectations of coastal residents. Environment and Behavior, 2006; 38(2):226-247.
11. Downey L. Environmental racial inequality in Detroit. Social Forces, 2006; 86(2):771-796.
12. Sicotte D, Swanson S. Whose risk in Philadelphia? Proximity to unequally hazardous industrial facilities. Social Science Quarterly, 2007; 88(2):515-534.
13. Heath RL, Seshadri S, Lee J. Risk communication: A two-community analysis of proximity, dread, trust, involvement, uncertainty, openness/accessibility, and knowledge on support/opposition toward chemical companies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1998; 10(1):35-56.
14. Pinker S. A theory of graph comprehension. Pp. 73-126 in Freedle R, (ed). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1990.
15. Cleveland WS, McGill R. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1984; 79(387):531-554.
16. Itti L. Visual salience. 2007 [updated 1/16/2010, June 4, 2010]. Available at:
17. DeLoache JS. Early understanding and use of symbols: The model model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1995; 4(4):109-113.
18. Griffith LJ, Leonard SD. Association of colors with warning signal words. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1997; 20:317-325.
19. Brewer CA. Basic mapping principles for visualizing cancer data using geographic information systems (GIS). American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006; 30(2, Supplement 1):S25-S36.
20. Baird JC. Psychophysical Analysis of Visual Space. New York : Pergomon Press, 1970.
21. Yantis S. How visual salience wins the battle for awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 2005; 8(8):975-977.
22. Florence D, Geiselman R. Human performance evaluation of alternative graphic display symbologies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1986; 63:399-406.
23. Ware C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. San Francisco : Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
24. Shepard D (ed). A Two Dimensional Interpolation Function for Regularly Spaced Data. Princeton, NJ : National Conference of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1968.
25. Shepard D. Computer mapping: The SYMAP interpolation algorithm. Pp. 133-145 in Gaile GL, Willmott CJ (eds). Spatial Statistics and Models. Dordrecht, Holland : D Reidel, 1984.
26. Willmott CJ, Rowe CM, Philpot WD. Small-scale climate maps: A sensitivity analysis of some common assumptions associated with grid-point interpolation and contouring. American Cartographer, 1985; 12:5-16.
27. Golden Software. Surfer, 9th ed. Golden, CO : Golden Software, Inc, 2009.
28. ESRI. ArcGIS Version 9.3. Redlands, CA 2008.
29. Shen C-Y, Reed HL, Foley TA. Shepard's interpolation for solution-adaptive methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 1993; 106:52-61.
30. Zuppa C. Error estimates for modified local Shepard's interpolation formula. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2004; 49:245-259.
31. Cook MP. Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design. Science Education, 2006; 90(6):1073-1091.
32. Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 1995; 7(1):1-75.
33. Weinstein ND. Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology, 1993; 12(4):324-333.
34. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 1988; 7:355-386.
35. Klein WM, Weinstein ND. Social comparison and unrealistic optimism about personal risk. Pp. 25-61 in Buunk BP, Gibbons FX (eds). Health, Coping, and Well-Being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.
36. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM. Predicting homeowners' mitigation responses to radon test data. Journal of Social Issues, 1992; 48(4):63-83.
37. Nelson W, Reyna VF, Fagerlin A, Lipkus I, Peters E. Clinical implications of numeracy: Theory and practice. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2008; 35:261-274.
38. de Hevia MD, Vallar G, Girelli L. Visualizing numbers in the mind's eye: The role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2008; 32:1361-1372.
39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ground water & drinking water. 2010 [July 22, 2010]. Available at:
40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Private drinking water wells. 2010 [July 22, 2010]. Available at:
41. Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM. Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale. Medical Decision Making, 2007; 27(5):672-680.
42. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Medical Decision Making, 2007; 27(5):663-671.
43. SPSS Inc. PASW for Windows, v. 18.0, Chicago, IL, 2009.
44. Slocum TA. Choropleth Mapping. Thematic Cartography and Geographic Visualization, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall, 2009.
45. Cresswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications, 2006.
46. MacEachren AM. How Maps Are Seen. How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design. New York : The Guilford Press, 1995.
47. Eriksen CW. Location of objects in a visual display as a function of the number of dimensions on which the objects differ. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952; 44(1):56-60.
48. Rogers JE, Groop RE. Regional portrayal with multi-pattern color dot maps. Cartographica, 1981; 18(4):51-64.
49. Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19(4):689-701.
50. Maier SR. Numeracy in the newsroom: A case study of mathematical competence and confidence. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2003; 80(4):921-936.
51. Yao X, Thill J-C. Spatial queries with qualitative locations in spatial information systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2006; 30(4):485-502.
52. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1987; 10(5):481-500.
53. Severtson DJ. Predictors of locational map accuracy: Implications for designing maps that communicate environmental risk. In review.
54. Monmonier M, Johnson BB. Design guide for environmental maps. 1997. [July 3, 2011]. Available at: