The perceived health risks of indoor radon gas and overhead powerlines: A comparative multilevel approach

Risk Analysis

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 235-248

  Poortinga, Wouter ^a   Cox, Patrick ^b   Pidgeon, Nick F ^c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Songololo Trust   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EMF; Multilevel modeling; Radon; Risk perceptions; Trust

Indexed keywords

HEALTH RISKS; OVERHEAD LINES; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION;

INDOOR RADON GAS; MULTILEVEL MODELING; SPATIAL PROXIMITY;

RADON;

RADON;

COMMUNICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GAS; HEALTH RISK; INDOOR AIR; MODELING; POWER LINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RADON; RISK PERCEPTION;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; POWER SUPPLY; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

ADULT; AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR; CHILD; CORRESPONDENCE AS TOPIC; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED; PERCEPTION; POWER PLANTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADON; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 39849111101     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01015.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ahlbom, A., Day, N., Feychting, M., Roman, E., Skinner, J., Dockerty, J., Linet, M., McBride, M., Michaelis, J., Olsen, J., Tynes, T., & Verkasalo, P. K. (2000). A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukemia. British Journal of Cancer, 83, 692 698.
2. Barber, B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick : Rutgers University Press.
3. Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30, 827 840.
4. Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P., & Pidgeon, N. (2007). Constructing responsibilities for risk: Negotiating citizen-state relationships. Environment and Planning A, advance online publication doi :.
5. Bickerstaff, K., & Walker, G. (2001). Public understandings of air pollution: The "localisation" of environmental risk. Global Environmental Change, 11, 133 145.
6. Bier, V. (2001). On the state of the art: Risk communication to the public. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71, 139 150.
7. Bord, R., & O'Connor, R. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 830 840.
8. Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., & Morgan, M. (1992). Characterizing mental models of hazardous processes: A methodology and an application to radon. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 85 100.
9. Bradley, E., & Thomas, J. (1996). An Analysis of Responses to Radon Remediation Advice. Chilton : National Radiological Protection Board.
10. Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999 1023.
11. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchial Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
12. Burningham, K., & Thrush, D. (2004). Pollution concerns in context: A comparison of the risks associated with living close to a road and a chemical factory. Journal of Risk Research, 7, 213 232.
13. Cabinet Office Strategy Unit 2002). Risk: Improving Government's Capability to Handle Risk. London : Cabinet Office.
14. Cox, P., Pidgeon, N., Lake, I., & Poortinga, W. (2005). Public Risk Perceptions on the Health Effects of Ionising Radiation and Power Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Report to the Department of Health, no. RRX89. Norwich : Centre for Environmental Risk.
15. Cvetkovitch, G., Earle, T. C., & Slovic, P. (1990). The effects of involvement, relevance and ability on risk communication effectiveness. In K. Borcherding, O. I. Larichev, & D. M. Messick (Eds. Contemporary Issues in Decision Making. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
16. Darby, S., Hill, D., Auvinen, A., Barros-Dios, J. M., Baysson, H., et al. (2005). Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: Collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. British Medical Journal, 330 (7485 223 228.
17. Darby, S., Whitley, E., Silcocks, P., Thakrar, B., Green, M., Lomas, P., Miles, J., Reeves, G., Fearn, T., & Doll, R. (1998). Risk of lung cancer associated with residential radon exposure in south-west England: A case-control study. British Journal of Cancer, 78, 394 408.
18. Davidson, D., & Freudenburg, W. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A critical re-examination. Environment and Behaviour, 28, 302 339.
19. DETR 2000). Review and Evaluation of the Radon Remediation Pilot Programme. Report no. DETR/RAS/00.004. London : Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
20. Douglas, M. (1985). Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
21. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley : University of California Press.
22. Draper, G., Vincent, T., Kroll, M., & Swanson, J. (2005). Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: A case-control study. British Medical Journal, 330, 1290 1295.
23. Eiser, J., Van Der Pligt, J., & Spears, R. (1995). Nuclear Neighbourhoods: Community Responses to Reactor Siting. Exeter : University of Exeter Press.
24. EPA 1987). Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. Washington : GPO.
25. Finucane, M., Slovic, P., Mertz, C., Flynn, J., & Satterfield, T. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The "white male" effect. Health Risk & Society, 2, 159 172.
26. Fisher, A., & Sjöberg, L. (1990). Radon risks: People's perceptions and reactions. In S. Majumdar, R. Schmalz, & E. Miller (Eds. Environmental Radon: Occurrence, Control and Health Hazards. Pittsburgh : Pennsylvania Academia of Sciences.
27. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101 1108.
28. Frick, U., Rehm, J., & Eichhammer, P. (2002). Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields - A randomized survey study. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 205, 353 360.
29. Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel Statistical Methods, 3rd ed. London : Hodder Arnold.
30. Green, B., Miles, J., & Rees, D. (2002). Radon Atlas of England and Wales. NRPB-W26. Didcot : National Radiological Protection Board.
31. Greenland, S., Sheppard, A. R., Kaune, W. T., Poole, C., & Kelsh, M. A. (2000). A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukaemia. Epidemiology, 11, 624 634.
32. Gregory, R., Slovic, P., & Flynn, J. (1996). Risk perceptions, stigma, and health policy. Health & Place, 2, 213 220.
33. Gregory, R., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (1996). The effects of electromagnetic fields from transmission lines on public fears and property values. Journal of Environmental Management, 48, 201 214.
34. Gustafson, P. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18, 805 811.
35. Hampson, S., Andrews, J., Lee, M., Foster, L., Glasgow, R., & Lichtenstein, E. (1998). Lay understanding of synergistic risk: The case of radon and cigarette smoking. Risk Analysis, 18, 343 350.
36. Irwin, A., Simmons, P., & Walker, G. (1999). Faulty environments and risk reasoning: The local understanding of industrial hazards. Environment and Planning A, 31, 1311 1326.
37. Joffe, H. (1999). Risk and "the Other." Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
38. Kennedy, C. (2001). Domestic radon remediation rates and reasons for testing. Environmental Management and Health, 12, 459 464.
39. Linder, S. (1995). Contending discourses in the electric and magnetic fields controversy: The social construction of EMF risk as a public problem. Policy Sciences, 28, 209 230.
40. Luginaah, I., Eyles, J., & Elliott, S. (2004). Informing the development of decision support tools for risk management: The case of electrical and magnetic fields. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 601 621.
41. MacGregor, D., Slovic, P., & Morgan, M. (1994). Perception of risks from electromagnetic fields: A psychometric evaluation of a risk-communication approach. Risk Analysis, 14, 815 828.
42. Morgan, M., Florig, H., Nair, I., Cortes, C., Marsh, K., & Pavlosky, K. (1990). Lay understanding of low-frequency electric and magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 11, 313 335.
43. Morgan, M., Slovic, P., Nair, I., Geisler, D., MacGregor, D., Fischhoff, B., Lincoln, D., & Florig, K. (1985). Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: A pilot study of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 5, 139 149.
44. Muirhead, C., Sienkiewics, Z., & KOwalczuk, C. (2005). Burden of Disease from Radiation Exposure. Didcot : Health Protection Agency, Radiation Protection Division.
45. Myers, A., Clayden, A. D., Cartwright, R. A., & Cartwright, S. C. (1990). Childhood cancer and overhead powerlines: A case-control study. British Journal of Cancer, 62, 1008 1014.
46. Neutra, R. R., DelPizzo, V., & Lee, G. (2002). An Evaluation of the Possible Risks from Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMFs) from Power Lines, Internal Wiring, and Electrical Occupations, sAppliances, Final Report. Sacramento, CA : California Department of Health Services.
47. NRC 1997). Possible Health Effects of Exposure to Residential Electric and Magnetic Fields. Washington : National Academy Press.
48. NRPB 1990). Documents of the NRPB, vol. 1, no. 1. London : HM Stationery Office.
49. November, V. (2004). Being close to risk. From proximity to connexity. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7, 273 286.
50. O'Neill, O. (2002). A Question of Trust. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
51. Petts, J. (2005). Health, responsibility and choice: Contrasting negotiations of air pollution and immunisation information. Environment and Planning A, 37, 791 804.
52. Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T., & Murdoch, G. (2001). Social Amplification of Risk: The Media and the Public. HSE Contract Research Report 329/01.
53. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R., & Slovic, P. (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
54. Poortinga, W. (2005). The use of multilevel modelling in risk research. A secondary analysis of a study of public perceptions of genetically modified food. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 583 597.
55. Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23, 961 972.
56. Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Analysis, 25, 197 207.
57. Rasbash, J. Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., Woodhouse, G., Draper, D., Langford, I., & Lewis, T. (2002). A User's Guide to MLwiN (Version 2.1d for use with MLwiN 1.10). London : Institute of Education, University of London.
58. Rippl, S. (2002). Cultural theory and risk perception: A proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Regulation, 5, 147 166.
59. Satterfield, T., Mertz, C., & Slovic, P. (2004). Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk. Risk Analysis, 24, 115 129.
60. Scottish Executive 2005). Public Attitudes to the Environment in Scotland. Edinburgh : Scottish Executive Social Research.
61. Siegrist, M., Earle, T., Gutscher, H., & Keller, C. (2005). Perception of mobile phone and base station risks. Risk Analysis, 25, 1253 1264.
62. Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk. London : Earthscan.
63. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. London : Sage.
64. Sturgis, P., Patulny, R., & Allum, N. (2007). What Makes Trusters Trust? Paper presented at the Reciprocity: Theories and Facts Conference, Milan, 22-24 February 2007. Available at http://staff.soc.surrey.ac.uk/psturgis/ papers/trusters3.pdf.
65. U.K. Childhood Cancer Study Investigators 2000). Childhood cancer and residential proximity to power lines. British Journal of Cancer, 83, 1573 1580.
66. Verkasalo, P. K., Pukkala, E., Hongisto, M., Valjus, J. E., Jaervinen, P. J., Heikkilae, K. V., & Koskenvuo, M. (1993). Risk of cancer in Finnish children living close to power lines. British Medical Journal, 307, 895 899.
67. Walls, J., Pidgeon, N., Weyman, A., & Horlick-Jones, T. (2004). Critical trust: Understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation. Health, Risk and Society, 6, 133 150.
68. Wiegman, O., Gutteling, J., & Boer, H. (1991). Verification of information through direct experiences with an industrial hazard. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 325 339.
69. Wertheimer, N., & Leeper, E. (1979). Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 273 284.
70. Wertheimer, N., & Leeper, E. (1982). Adult cancer related to electrical wires near the home. International Journal of Epidemiology, 11, 345 355.
71. Weinstein, N., Klotz, M., & Sandman, P. (1989). Promoting remedial response to the risk of radon: Are information campaigns enough? Science, Technology & Human Values, 14, 360 379.