Feasibility of Sustaining Sugars in Sweet Sorghum Stalks During Post-Harvest Stage by Exploring Cultivars and Chemicals: A Desk Study

Sugar Tech

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 21-25

  Rao, P Srinivasa ^a   Kumar, C Ganesh ^b   Malapaka, Jayalakshmi ^b   Kamal, Ahmed ^b   Reddy, Belum V S ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Chemicals; Juice quality; Post harvest losses; Sweet sorghum

Indexed keywords

SWINEPOX VIRUS (STRAIN KASZA);

EID: 84857052818     PISSN: 09721525     EISSN: 09740740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-011-0133-x     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. AICSIP (All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project). 2010. Sweet sorghum physiology. All India coordinated sorghum improvement project annual progress report for 2009-2010. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Sorghum Group Meeting-Agm10 (Book 2 of 4), p. 156. Directorate of Sorghum Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2. Bretschneider, R., Rehor., J., and Zdarsky, J. 1976. Method of post-harvest treatment of sugarcane. US Patent 3975204.
3. Desai, B. B., P. B. Sangle, and S. L. Gaur. 1985. Chemical control of post harvest losses in sugarcane. Current Research Report 1: 33.
4. Eggleston, G. 2002. Deterioration of cane juice-sources and indicators. Food Chemistry 78: 99-107.
5. Eggleston, G., B. L. Legendre, and C. Richard. 2001. Effect of harvest method and storage time on cane deterioration. I. Cane quality changes. International Sugar Journal 103: 331-338.
6. Hanko, V. P., and J. S. Rohrer. 2000. Determination of carbohydrates, sugar alcohol and glycols in cell cultures and fermentation broths using high performance ion exchange chromatographs with pulsed amperometric determination. Analytical Biochemistry 283: 192-199.
7. Huang, H., X. Guo, D. Li, M. Liu, J. Wu, and H. Ren. 2011. Identification of crucial yeast inhibitors in bio-ethanol and improvement of fermentation at high pH and high total solids. Bioresource Technology 102: 7486-7493.
8. Janakiramaiah, K., Satyanarayana, N., and Murty, T. S. N. 1967. The deterioration of cane juices by Leuconostoc mesenteroides. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference V STAI 35 (part I), vol. 127, pp. 85-90.
9. Kumar, C. G., A. Fatima, P. Srinivasa Rao, B. V. S. Reddy, A. Rathore, R. Nageswar Rao, S. Khalid, and A. Kamal. 2010. Characterization of improved sweet sorghum genotypes for biochemical parameters, sugar yield and its attributes at different phenological stages. Sugar Tech 12: 322-328.
10. Lingle, S. E. 2010. Opportunities and challenges of sweet sorghum as a feedstock for biofuel. In: Sustainability of the sugar and sugar-ethanol industries, chap. 11, ACS Symposium. Series 1058, pp. 177-188.
11. Lionnet, G. R. E. 1996. A review of cane quality in South Africa and its impact on factory performance. Proceedings of ISSCT 22: 103-113.
12. Luo, C., D. L. Brink, and H. W. Blanch. 2002. Identification of potential fermentation inhibitors in conversion of hybrid poplar hydrolyzate to ethanol. Biomass and Bioenergy 22: 125-138.
13. Nichols, N. N., B. S. Dien, and M. A. Cotta. 2010. Fermentation of bioenergy crops into ethanol using biological abatement for removal of inhibitors. Bioresource Technology 101: 7545-7550.
14. Palmqvist, E., and B. Hahn-Hagerdhal. 2000. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II. Inhibitors and mechanism of inhibition. Bioresource Technology 74: 25-33.
15. Purchase, B. S. 2001. Losses caused by microorganisms. Proceedings ISSCT 24: 379.
16. Rosaio, E. J., and S. Santisopasri. 1977. Characterization and inhibition of invertase in sugarcane juice. Phytochemistry 16: 443-445.
17. Sharma, K. P, Rattana, B. K, Kanwar, R. S. 1989. Improvement in sugar recovery by preventing bacterial polysaccharide production in cane juice. Bharatiya Sugar, 15-18.
18. Singh, P., N. Arya, P. Tiwari, A. Suman, R. K. Rai, A. K. Shrivastava, and S. Solomon. 2008. Use of glutaraldehyde and benzalkonium chloride for minimizing post-harvest physio-chemical and microbial changes responsible for sucrose losses in sugarcane. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56: 7176-7183.
19. Solomon, S. 2009. Post-harvest deterioration of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 11: 109-123.
20. Solomon, S., H. N. Shahi, A. Suman, A. Gaur, S. Deb, and I. Singh. 2001. A survey of post-harvest biological losses in Indian sugar factories: An emerging challenge. Proceedings of ISSCT 24: 380-381.
21. Solomon, S., R. Banerji, A. K. Srivastava, P. Singh, I. Singh, M. Verma, C. P. Prajapati, and A. Sawnani. 2006. Post-harvest deterioration of sugarcane and chemical methods to minimize sucrose losses. Sugar Tech 8: 74-78.
22. Srinivasarao, P., Rao, S. S., Seetharama, N., Umakanth, A. V., Sanjana Reddy, P., Reddy, B. V. S., and Gowda, C. L. L. 2009. Sweet sorghum for biofuel and strategies for its improvement. Information Bulletin no. 77, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India. pp 80. ISBN 978-92-9066-518-2.
23. Srinivasarao, P., P. S. Reddy, A. Rathore, B. V. S. Reddy, and S. Panwar. 2011. Application GGE biplot and AMMI model to evaluate sweet sorghum hybrids for genotype × environment interaction and seasonal adaptation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81: 438-444.
24. Tilbury, R. H., Hollingsworth, B. S., Graham, S. D., Pottage, P. 1977. Mill sanitation-a fresh approach to biocide evaluation. In: Proceedings of XVI Congress ISSCT, pp. 2749-2767.
25. Tomar, B. S., and S. S. Malik. 2004. Micronutrients impact on growth, yield and staleness of sugarcane variety CoS 8436. Co-operative Sugar 36: 255-256.
26. Zhao, Y. L., A. Dolat, Y. Steinberger, X. Wang, A. Osman, and G. H. Xie. 2009. Biomass yield and changes in chemical composition of sweet sorghum cultivars grown for biofuel. Field Crops Research 111: 55-64.