Fostered and left behind alleles in peanut: Interspecific QTL mapping reveals footprints of domestication and useful natural variation for breeding

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Fonceka, Daniel ^a   Tossim, Hodo Abalo ^b   Rivallan, Ronan ^a   Vignes, Hélène ^a   Faye, Issa ^b   Ndoye, Ousmane ^b   Moretzsohn, Márcio C ^c   Bertioli, David J ^d   Glaszmann, Jean Christophe ^a   Courtois, Brigitte ^a   Rami, Jean François ^a  

^a UMR AGAP   (France)

^b ISRA/Ceraas ^*  (Senegal)

^c EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; CROSS BREEDING; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; PEANUT; POLYPLOIDY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ALLELES; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; POLYPLOIDY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84857025506     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-26     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Wendel JF. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol 2000, 42:225-249. 10.1023/A:1006392424384, 10688139.
2. Adams KL, Wendel JF. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2005, 8:135-141. 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.001, 15752992.
3. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 1999, 14:348-352. 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01638-9, 10441308.
4. Paterson AH. Polyploidy, evolutionary opportunity, and crop adaptation. Genetica 2005, 123:191-196. 10.1007/s10709-003-2742-0, 15881691.
5. Udall JA, Wendel JF. Polyploidy and crop improvement. Crop Sci 2006, 46:S-3-14.
6. Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:5737-5742. 10.1073/pnas.0900906106, 2667025, 19325131.
7. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Bell CD, Paterson AH, Zheng C, Sankoff D, dePamphilis CW, Wall PK, Soltis PS. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am J Bot 2009, 96:336-348. 10.3732/ajb.0800079, 21628192.
8. Kochert G, Stalker HT, Gimenes MA, Galgaro ML, Lopes CR, Moore K. RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origin and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 1996, 83:1282-1291.
9. Dwivedi SL, Bertioli D, Crouch JH, Valls JFM, Upadhyaya HD, Favero AP, Moretzsohn MC, Paterson AH. Peanut. Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants 2007, 2:115-151. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg, Kole C.
10. He G, Prakash CS. Identification of polymorphic DNA markers in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 1997, 97:143-149.
11. Hopkins MS, Casa AM, Wang T, Mitchell SE, Dean RE, Kochert GD, Kresovich S. Discovery and characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in peanut. Crop Sci 1999, 39:1243-1247.
12. Gimenes M, Hoshino A, Barbosa A, Palmieri D, Lopes C. Characterization and transferability of microsatellite markers of the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea). BMC Plant Biol 2007, 7:9. 10.1186/1471-2229-7-9, 1829157, 17326826.
13. Cuc L, Mace E, Crouch J, Quang V, Long T, Varshney R. Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite markers and their application for diversity assessment in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). BMC Plant Biol 2008, 8:55. 10.1186/1471-2229-8-55, 2416452, 18482440.
14. Liang X, Chen X, Hong Y, Liu H, Zhou G, Li S, Guo B. Utility of EST-derived SSR in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Arachis wild species. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9:35. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-35, 2678122, 19309524.
15. Varshney R, Bertioli D, Moretzsohn M, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Aruna R, Nigam S, Moss B, Seetha K, Ravi K, He G, Knapp S, Hoisington D. The first SSR-based genetic linkage map for cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 2008, 118:729-739.
16. Hong Y, Chen X, Liang X, Liu H, Zhou G, Li S, Wen S, Holbrook CC, Guo B. A SSR-based composite genetic linkage map for the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genome. BMC Plant Biol 2010, 10:17. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-17, 2835713, 20105299.
17. Ravi K, Vadez V, Isobe S, Mir RR, Guo Y, Nigam SN, Gowda MVC, Radhakrishnan T, Bertioli DJ, Knapp SJ, Varshney RK. Identification of several small main-effect QTLs and a large number of epistatic QTLs for drought tolerance related traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 2010, 122:1119-1132. 3057011, 21191568.
18. Lu J, Pickersgill B. Isozyme variation and species relationships in peanut and its wild relatives (Arachis L.-Leguminosae). Theor Appl Genet 1993, 85:550-560.
19. Raina SN, Rani V, Kojima T, Ogihara Y, Singh KP, Devarumath RM. RAPD and ISSR fingerprints as useful genetic markers for analysis of genetic diversity, varietal identification, and phylogenetic relationships in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars and wild species. Genome 2001, 44:763-72.
20. Gimenes MA, Lopes CR, Galgaro ML, Valls JFM, Kochert G. RFLP analysis of genetic variation in species of section Arachis, genus Arachis (Leguminosae). Euphytica 2002, 123:421-429.
21. Moretzsohn M, Hopkins M, Mitchell S, Kresovich S, Valls J, Ferreira M. Genetic diversity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and its wild relatives based on the analysis of hypervariable regions of the genome. BMC Plant Biol 2004, 4:11. 10.1186/1471-2229-4-11, 491793, 15253775.
22. Tallury SP, Hilu KW, Milla SR, Friend SA, Alsaghir M, Stalker HT, Quandt D. Genomic affinities in Arachis section Arachis (Fabaceae): molecular and cytogenetic evidence. Theor Appl Genet 2005, 111:1229-1237. 10.1007/s00122-005-0017-0, 16187123.
23. Singh KP, Singh A, Raina SN, Singh AK, Ogihara Y. Ribosomal DNA repeat unit polymorphism and heritability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) accessions and related wild species. Euphytica 2002, 123:211-220.
24. Seijo G, Lavia GI, Fernandez A, Krapovickas A, Ducasse DA, Bertioli DJ, Moscone EA. Genomic relationships between the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea, Leguminosae) and its close relatives revealed by double GISH. Am J Bot 2007, 94:1963-1971. 10.3732/ajb.94.12.1963, 21636391.
25. Robledo G, Lavia G, Seijo G. Species relations among wild Arachis species with the A genome as revealed by FISH mapping of rDNA loci and heterochromatin detection. Theor Appl Genet 2009, 118:1295-1307. 10.1007/s00122-009-0981-x, 19234686.
26. Robledo G, Seijo G. Species relationships among the wild B genome of Arachis species (section Arachis) based on FISH mapping of rDNA loci and heterochromatin detection: a new proposal for genome arrangement. Theor Appl Genet 2010, 121:1033-1046. 10.1007/s00122-010-1369-7, 20552326.
27. Milla SR, Isleib TG, Stalker HT. Taxonomic relationships among Arachis sect. Arachis species as revealed by AFLP markers. Genome 2005, 48:1-11. 10.1139/g04-089, 15729391.
28. Burow MD, Simpson CE, Faries MW, Starr JL, Paterson AH. Molecular biogeographic study of recently described B- and A-genome Arachis species, also providing new insights into the origins of cultivated peanut. Genome 2009, 52:107-119. 10.1139/G08-094, 19234559.
29. Favero AP, Simpson CE, Valls JFM, Vello NA. Study of the evolution of cultivated peanut through crossability studies among Arachis ipaensis, A. duranensis, and A. hypogaea. Crop Sci 2006, 46:1546-1552.
30. Reddy AS, Reddy LJ, Mallikarjuna N, Abdurahman MD, Reddy YV, Bramel PJ, Reddy DVR. Identification of resistance to peanut bud necrosis virus (PBNV) in wild Arachis germplasm. Ann Appl Biol 2000, 137:135-139.
31. Sharma SB, Ansari MA, Varaprasad KS, Singh AK, Reddy LJ. Resistance to Meloidogyne javanica in wild Arachis species*. Genet Resour Crop Ev 1999, 46:557-568.
32. Pande S, Rao JN. Resistance of wild Arachis species to late leaf spot and rust in greenhouse trials. Plant Dis 2001, 85:851-855.
33. Dwivedi SL, Pande S, Rao JN, Nigam SN. Components of resistance to late leaf spot and rust among interspecific derivatives and their significance in a foliar disease resistance breeding in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 2002, 125:81-88.
34. Leal-Bertioli S, Jose AC, Alves-Freitas D, Moretzsohn M, Guimaraes P, Nielen S, Vidigal B, Pereira R, Pike J, Favero A, Parniske M, Varshney R, Bertioli D. Identification of candidate genome regions controlling disease resistance in Arachis. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9:112. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-112, 2739205, 19698131.
35. Simpson CE, Starr JL. Registration of "COAN" Peanut. Crop Sci 2001, 41:918.
36. Simpson CE, Starr JL, Church GT, Burow MD, Paterson AH. Registration of "NemaTAM" Peanut. Crop Sci 2003, 43:1561.
37. Garcia GM, Tallury SP, Stalker HT, Kochert G. Molecular analysis of Arachis interspecific hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 2006, 112:1342-1348. 10.1007/s00122-006-0236-z, 16489428.
38. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 1997, 277:1063-1066. 10.1126/science.277.5329.1063, 9262467.
39. Gur A, Zamir D. Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:e245. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020245, 514488, 15328532.
40. Hajjar H. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 2007, 156:1-13.
41. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 1996, 92:213-224.
42. Swamy BPM, Sarla N. Yield-enhancing quantitative trait loci (QTLs) from wild species. Biotechnol Adv 2008, 26:106-120. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.09.005, 17949936.
43. Paterson AH. What has QTL mapping taught us about plant domestication?. New Phytol 2002, 154:591-608.
44. Hammer K. Das domestikationssyndrom. Die Kulturpflanze 1984, 32:11-34.
45. Harlan JR. Origins and processes of domestication. Grass evolution and domestication 1992, 159-175. G.P. Chapman. Cambridge University Press.
46. Koinange EMK, Singh SP, Gepts PL. Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean. Crop Sci 1996, 36:1037-1045.
47. Burke JM, Tang S, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH. Genetic analysis of sunflower domestication. Genetics 2002, 161:1257. 1462183, 12136028.
48. Gepts P. Crop domestication as a long-term selection experiment. Plant Breed Rev 2004, 24:1-44.
49. Pickersgill B. Domestication of plants in the Americas: Insights from mendelian and molecular genetics. Ann Bot 2007, 100:925-940. 10.1093/aob/mcm193, 2759216, 17766847.
50. Krapovickas A, Gregory W. Taxonomía del género Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 1994, 8:1-186.
51. Foncéka D, Hodo-Abalo T, Rivallan R, Faye I, Sall MN, Ndoye O, Fávero AP, Bertioli DJ, Glaszmann J-C, Courtois B, Rami J-F. Genetic mapping of wild introgressions into cultivated peanut: a way toward enlarging the genetic basis of a recent allotetraploid. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9:103. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-103, 3091533, 19650911.
52. Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: a critical review. Plant Growth Regul 2003, 41:75-88.
53. Clavel D, Drame NK, Roy-Macauley H, Braconnier S, Laffray D. Analysis of early responses to drought associated with field drought adaptation in four Sahelian groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars. Environ Exper Bot 2005, 54:219-230.
54. Clavel D, Sarr B, Marone E, Ortiz R. Potential agronomic and physiological traits of Spanish groundnut varieties (Arachis hypogaea L.) as selection criteria under end-of-cycle drought conditions. Agronomie 2004, 24:101-111.
55. Sarr B, Lecoeur J, Clouvel P. Irrigation scheduling of confectionery groundnut (Arachis hypogeaea L.) in Senegal using a simple water balance model. Agr Water Manage 2004, 67:201-220.
56. IBPGR, ICRISAT Descriptors for groundnut 1992, Rome, Italy and Patancheru, A.P., India: Int. Board of Plant Genetic Resources and Int. Crops Res. Inst. For the Semi-Arid Tropics, IBPGR, ICRISAT.
57. Fernandez GCJ. Selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress 1992, 257-269. Taïwan: Kuo C.G..
58. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010, Vienna, Austria, R Development Core Team.
59. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen T, Churchill GA. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:889-890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112, 12724300.
60. Servin B, Dillmann C, Decoux G, Hospital F. MDM: a program to compute fully informative genotype frequencies in complex breeding schemes. J Hered 2002, 93:227-8. 10.1093/jhered/93.3.227, 12195044.
61. Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 1994, 138:963-971. 1206241, 7851788.
62. Broman KW, Sen T. A Guide to QTL Mapping with R/qtl 2009, Springer Verlag.
63. Sadras VO, Milroy SP. Soil-water thresholds for the responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange: A review. Field Crop Res 1996, 47:253-266.
64. Boote KJ. Growth stages of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science 1982, 9:35-40.
65. Stalker HT. Utilizing Arachis cardenasii as a source of Cercospora leafspot resistance for peanut improvement. Euphytica 1984, 33:529-538.
66. Halward TM, Wynne JC, Stalker HT. Recurrent selection progress in a population derived from an interspecific peanut cross. Euphytica 1991, 52:79-84.
67. Garcia GM, Stalker HT, Shroeder E, Kochert G. Identification of RAPD, SCAR, and RFLP markers tightly linked to nematode resistance genes introgressed from Arachis cardenasii into Arachis hypogaea. Genome 1996, 39:836-45. 10.1139/g96-106, 8890516.
68. Ndunguru BJ, Ntare BR, Williams JH, Greenberg DC. Assessment of groundnut cultivars for end-of-season drought tolerance in a Sahelian environment. J Agr Sci 1995, 125:79-85.
69. Songsri P, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC. Heritability of drought resistance traits and correlation of drought resistance and agronomic traits in peanut. Crop Sci 2008, 48:2245-2253.
70. Burow MD, Simpson CE, Starr JL, Paterson AH. Transmission genetics of chromatin from a synthetic amphidiploid to cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). broadening the gene pool of a monophyletic polyploid species. Genetics 2001, 159:823-37. 1461827, 11606556.
71. Moretzsohn M, Barbosa A, Alves-Freitas D, Teixeira C, Leal-Bertioli S, Guimaraes P, Pereira R, Lopes C, Cavallari M, Valls J, Bertioli D, Gimenes M. A linkage map for the B-genome of Arachis (Fabaceae) and its synteny to the A-genome. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9:40. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-40, 2674605, 19351409.
72. Gao S, Gu YQ, Wu J, Coleman-Derr D, Huo N, Crossman C, Jia J, Zuo Q, Ren Z, Anderson OD, Kong X. Rapid evolution and complex structural organization in genomic regions harboring multiple prolamin genes in polyploid wheat genome. Plant Mol Biol 2007, 65:189-203. 10.1007/s11103-007-9208-1, 17629796.
73. Doyle JJ, Flagel LE, Paterson AH, Rapp RA, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Wendel JF. Evolutionary genetics of genome merger and doubling in plants. Annu Rev Genet 2008, 42:443-461. 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091524, 18983261.
74. Adams KL, Cronn R, Percifield R, Wendel JF. Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:4649-4654. 10.1073/pnas.0630618100, 153610, 12665616.
75. Chaudhary B, Flagel L, Stupar RM, Udall JA, Verma N, Springer NM, Wendel JF. Reciprocal silencing, transcriptional bias and functional divergence of homeologs in polyploid cotton (gossypium). Genetics 2009, 182:503-517. 10.1534/genetics.109.102608, 2691759, 19363125.
76. Flagel LE, Wendel JF. Evolutionary rate variation, genomic dominance and duplicate gene expression evolution during allotetraploid cotton speciation. New Phytol 2010, 186:184-193. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03107.x, 20002320.
77. Rong J, Feltus FA, Waghmare VN, Pierce GJ, Chee PW, Draye X, Saranga Y, Wright RJ, Wilkins TA, May OL, Smith CW, Gannaway JR, Wendel JF, Paterson AH. Meta-analysis of polyploid cotton QTL shows unequal contributions of subgenomes to a complex network of genes and gene clusters implicated in lint fiber development. Genetics 2007, 176:2577-2588. 10.1534/genetics.107.074518, 1950656, 17565937.
78. Sourdille P, Cadalen T, Guyomarc'h H, Snape JW, Perretant MR, Charmet G, Boeuf C, Bernard S, Bernard M. An update of the Courtot × Chinese Spring intervarietal molecular marker linkage map for the QTL detection of agronomic traits in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 2003, 106:530-538.
79. Chu C-G, Xu S, Friesen T, Faris J. Whole genome mapping in a wheat doubled haploid population using SSRs and TRAPs and the identification of QTL for agronomic traits. Mol Breeding 2008, 22:251-266.
80. Quarrie SA, Steed A, Calestani C, Semikhodskii A, Lebreton C, Chinoy C, Steele N, Pljevljakusić D, Waterman E, Weyen J, Schondelmaier J, Habash DZ, Farmer P, Saker L, Clarkson DT, Abugalieva A, Yessimbekova M, Turuspekov Y, Abugalieva S, Tuberosa R, Sanguineti M-C, Hollington PA, Aragués R, Royo A, Dodig D. A high-density genetic map of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from the cross Chinese Spring × SQ1 and its use to compare QTLs for grain yield across a range of environments. Theor Appl Genet 2005, 110:865-880. 10.1007/s00122-004-1902-7, 15719212.
81. Grandillo S, Ku HM, Tanksley SD. Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 1999, 99:978-987.
82. Briggs WH, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Doebley J. Linkage mapping of domestication loci in a large maize teosinte backcross resource. Genetics 2007, 177:1915-1928. 10.1534/genetics.107.076497, 2147989, 17947434.
83. Sweeney M, McCouch S. The complex history of the domestication of rice. Ann Bot 2007, 100:951-957. 10.1093/aob/mcm128, 2759204, 17617555.
84. Peng J, Ronin Y, Fahima T, Röder MS, Li Y, Nevo E, Korol A. Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:2489-2494. 10.1073/pnas.252763199, 151368, 12604784.
85. Paterson AH, Lin Y-R, Li Z, Schertz KF, Doebley JF, Pinson SRM, Liu S-C, Stansel JW, Irvine JE. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 1995, 269:1714-1718. 10.1126/science.269.5231.1714, 17821643.
86. Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay M-C, Lester RN, Tanksley SD. Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication Traits in Eggplant. Genetics 2002, 161:1713-1726. 1462228, 12196413.
87. Weeden NF. Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: Is there a common genetic basis to the "domestication syndrome" for legumes?. Ann Bot 2007, 100:1017-1025. 10.1093/aob/mcm122, 2759201, 17660515.
88. Gondo T, Sato S, Okumura K, Tabata S, Akashi R, Isobe S. Quantitative trait locus analysis of multiple agronomic traits in the model legume Lotus japonicus. Genome 2007, 50:627-637. 10.1139/G07-040, 17893740.
89. Hougaard BK, Madsen LH, Sandal N, de Carvalho Moretzsohn M, Fredslund J, Schauser L, Nielsen AM, Rohde T, Sato S, Tabata S, Bertioli DJ, Stougaard J. Legume anchor markers link syntenic regions between Phaseolus vulgaris, Lotus japonicus, Medicago truncatula and Arachis. Genetics 2008, 179:2299-2312. 10.1534/genetics.108.090084, 2516099, 18689902.
90. Bertioli D, Moretzsohn M, Madsen L, Sandal N, Leal-Bertioli S, Guimaraes P, Hougaard B, Fredslund J, Schauser L, Nielsen A, Sato S, Tabata S, Cannon S, Stougaard J. An analysis of synteny of Arachis with Lotus and Medicago sheds new light on the structure, stability and evolution of legume genomes. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:45. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-45, 2656529, 19166586.