A cross-cultural study of students' approaches to professional dilemmas: Sticks or ripples

Medical Education

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 245-256

  Ho, Ming Jung ^a   Lin, Chi Wei ^a   Chiu, Yu Ting ^a   Lingard, Lorelei ^b   Ginsburg, Shiphra ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TAIWAN; VIDEORECORDING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TAIWAN; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 84857017613     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04149.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Veloski JJ, Fields SK, Boex JR, Blank LL. Measuring professionalism: a review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002. Acad Med 2005;80 (4):366-70.
2. Jha V, Bekker HL, Duffy SRG, Roberts TE. A systematic review of studies assessing and facilitating attitudes towards professionalism in medicine. Med Educ 2007;41 (8):822-9.
3. Arnold L. Assessing professional behaviour: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med 2002;77 (6):502-15.
4. Stern DT. Measuring Medical Professionalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 2006.
5. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Teaching Medical Professionalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 2009.
6. Lesser CS, Lucey CR, Egener B, Braddock CH III, Linas SL, Levinson W. A behavioural and systems view of professionalism. JAMA 2010;304 (24):2732-7.
7. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R, McNaughton N, Frohna A, Hodges B, Lingard L, Stern D. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med 2000;75 (10 Suppl):6-11.
8. Hodges BD, Ginsburg S, Cruess R etal. Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach 2011;33:354-63.
9. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. A plea for new psychometric models in educational assessment. Med Educ 2006;40 (4):296-300.
10. Kuper A, Reeves S, Albert M, Hodges BD. Assessment: do we need to broaden our methodological horizons? Med Educ 2007;41 (12):1121-3.
11. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Stern D, Lingard L. The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students' perceptions. Acad Med 2002;77 (6):516-22.
12. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. To be and not to be: the paradox of the emerging professional stance. Med Educ 2003;37 (4):350-7.
13. Baldwin DC Jr, Self DJ. The assessment of moral reasoning and professionalism in medical education and practice. In: Stern DT, ed. Measuring Medical Professionalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 2006;75-93.
14. Lingard L, Garwood K, Szauter K, Stern D. The rhetoric of rationalisation: how students grapple with professional dilemmas. Acad Med 2001;76 (10 Suppl):45-7.
15. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. The disavowed curriculum: understanding students' reasoning in professionally challenging situations. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18 (12):1015-22.
16. Ginsburg S, Lingard L, Regehr G, Underwood K. Know when to rock the boat: how faculty rationalise students' behaviours. J Gen Intern Med 2007;23 (7):942-7.
17. Ginsburg S, Lingard L. 'Is that normal?' Pre-clerkship students' approaches to professional dilemmas. Med Educ 2011;45 (4):362-71.
18. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Program Director Guide to the Common Program Requirements. 2009. [Accessed 15 January 2012.]
19. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programmes leading to the md degree. 2010. [Accessed 15 January 2012.]
20. ACGME-International. Program director guide to the foundational requirements. 2011. [Accessed 15 January 2012.]
21. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. LCME considers proposed changes in accreditation standards. 2006. [Accessed 29 September 2011.]
22. Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Teaching professionalism across cultural and national borders: lessons learned from an AMEE workshop. Med Teach 2010;32 (5):371-4.
23. Ho M, Yu K, Hirsh D, Huang T, Yang P. Does one size fit all? Building a framework for medical professionalism. Acad Med 2011;86 (11):1407-14.
24. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications 2006;123-51.
25. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1998;109-35.
26. Maxwell J. Using numbers in qualitative research. Qual Inq 2010;16 (6):475-82.
27. Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. Medical students learning intimate examinations without valid consent: a multicentre study. Med Educ 2011;45 (3):261-72.
28. Fei HT. From the Soil, the Foundation of Chinese Society: A Translation of Fei Xiaotong's Xiangtu Zhongguo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 19921948;24-7.
29. Hsu FLK. Psychosocial homeostasis and jen: conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. Am Anthropol 1971;73 (1):23-44.
30. Ho DYF. Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: an analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian J Soc Psychol 1998;1 (1):1-16.
31. Hwang KK. Chinese relationalism: theoretical construction and methodological considerations. J Theory Soc Behav 2000;30 (2):155-78.
32. Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med 1998;73 (4):403-7.
33. Hafferty F. The elephant in medical professionalism's kitchen. Acad Med 2006;81 (10):906-14.
34. Wright SM, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Howard DM, Brancati FL. Attributes of excellent attending physician role models. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1986-93.