Four potential disconnects in the community planning process

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 33-47

  Loh, Carolyn G ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

citizen participation; governance; growth management; implementation; land use; public administration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857014368     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X11424161     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams D.Urban planning and the development process. London: UCL Press; 1994.
2. Alexander E.R.,Faludi A.Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1989;16:127-40.
3. Alterman R.,Hill M.Implementation of urban land use plans.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1978;33 (3): 274-85.
4. Arendt R.Land-use planning in Britain and New England.Monadnock Perspectives. 1987;8 (2): 1-3.
5. Arendt R.,Brabec E.A.Rural by design. Chicago: American Planning Association; 1994.
6. Arnstein S.A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1969;35 (4): 216-24.
7. Baer W.C.General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1997;63 (3): 329-44.
8. Bengston D.N.,Fletcher J.O.,Nelson K.C.Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States.Landscape and Urban Planning. 2004;69:271-86.
9. Berke P.,Backhurst M.,Day M.,Ericksen N.,Laurian L.,Crawford J.,Dixon J.What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2006a;33:581-600.
10. Berke P.,Ericksen N.,Crawford J.,Dixon J.Indigenous people: Human rights and environmental protection in New Zealand.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;22:115-34.
11. Berke P.,French S.P.The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1994;13:237-50.
12. Berke P.R.,Godschalk D.R.,Kaiser E.J.Urban land use planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 2006b.
13. Brody S.D.,Highfield W.E.Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005;71 (2): 159-75.
14. Brown D.G.,Johnson K.M.,Loveland T.R.,Theobald D.M.Rural land use change in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000.Ecological Applications. 2005;15 (6): 1851-63.
15. Burby R.J.Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2003;69 (1): 33-49.
16. Burby R.J.,May P.J.Making governments plan: State experiments in managing growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.
17. Burby R.J.,May P.J.,Paterson R.C.Improving compliance with regulations: Choices and outcomes for local government.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1998;64 (3): 324-34.
18. Calkins H.W.The planning monitor: An accountability theory of plan evaluation.Environment and Planning A. 1979;11:745-58.
19. Chapin T.S.,Deyle R.E.,Baker J.A parcel-based GIS method for evaluating conformance of local land-use planning with a state mandate to reduce exposure to hurricane flooding.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2008;35:261-79.
20. Dalton L.C.,Burby R.J.Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local committment to development management.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1994;60 (4): 444-61.
21. deLeon, P. 1999. The stages approach to the policy process: What has it done? Where is it going? Theories of the Policy Process, ed. P. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview.
22. Fiorina, M. P. 1999. Extreme voices: A dark side of civic engagement. Civic Engagement in American Democracy, ed.Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina, 395-426. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23. Gerring J.What is a case study and what is it good for?.The American Political Science Review. 2004;98 (2): 341-54.
24. Healey P.Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory.Town Planning Review. 1992;63 (2): 143-62.
25. Hibbard M.,Lurie S.Saving land but losing ground: Challenges to community planning in the era of participation.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2000;20:187-95.
26. Hodkinson, P., and H. Hodkinson. 2001. The strengths and limitations of case study research. Learning and Skills Development Agency Conference, Cambridge, UK, 5-7 December.
27. Holstein J.A.,Gubrium J.F.The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
28. Hopkins L.D.Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2001.
29. Innes J.E.Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1996;62 (4): 460-72.
30. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., and P. Sabatier. 1993. The study of public policy processes. In Policy learning and change: An advocacy coalition approach, ed. P. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith. Boulder, CO: Westview.
31. Kartez J.D.,Casto M.P.Information into action.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2008;74 (4): 467-80.
32. Kelly E.D.,Becker B.Community planning: An introduction to the comprehensive plan. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2000.
33. Kirk J.,Miller M.L.Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1986.
34. Knaap G.,Hopkins L.D.,Donaghy K.P.Do plans matter? A game theoretic model for examining the logic and effects of land use planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1998;18:25-34.
35. Lasswell, H. D. 1951. The policy orientation. In The policy sciences, ed. D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
36. Laurian L.,Day M.,Berke P.,Ericksen N.,Backhurst M.,Crawford J.,Dixon J.Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2004;70 (4): 471-80.
37. Li X.,Yeh A.G.-O.Analyzing spatial restructuring of land use patterns in a fast growing region using remote sensing and GIS.Landscape and Urban Planning. 2004;69 (4): 335-54.
38. Liu X.2035 Forecast for Southeast Michigan: Population, households, and jobs for counties, cities, villages, and townships 2005-2035. Detroit, MI: SEMCOG; 2008.
39. Loh C.G.Assessing and interpreting non-conformance in land-use planning implementation.Planning Practice and Research. 2011;26 (3): 271-87.
40. Macomb township master plan. Michigan: Macomb Township Board of Trustees, Macomb Township; 2002.
41. McGrain B.,Baumer A.J.To plan or not to plan. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Public Policy and Social Research; 2004.
42. Meyerson M.,Banfield E.C.Politics, planning, and the public interest: The case of public housing in Chicago. New York: Free Press; 1955.
43. Nelson A.C.,Moore T.Assessing growth management policy implementation.Land Use Policy. 1996;13 (4): 241-59.
44. Norton R.K.More and better local planning: State-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005a;71 (1): 55-71.
45. Norton R.K.Striking the balance between environment and economy in coastal North Carolina.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2005b;48 (2): 177-207.
46. Norton R.K.Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning codes.Land Use Policy. 2008;25 (3): 432-54.
47. Pressman J.L.,Wildavsky A.Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1973.
48. Puppim de Oliveira J.A.Enforcing protected area guidelines in Brazil: What explains participation in the implementation process.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2005;24:420-36.
49. Rubin H.J.,Rubin I.S.Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.
50. Sabatier, P. 1999. The need for better theories. In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. P. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview.
51. Talen E.After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1996a;16:79-91.
52. Talen E.Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning.Journal of Planning Literature. 1996b;10:248-59.
53. Talen E.,Knaap G.Legalizing smart growth: An empirical study of land use regulation in Illinois.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2003;22:345-59.
54. Tauxe C.S.Marginalizing public participation in local planning: An ethnographic account.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1995;61 (4): 471-81.
55. Adopted 2001 Master Plan: Amendments and References to the 1982 Master Plan and the 1996 Comprehensive Plan (including 2008 map updates). 2003;.
56. Wondolleck J.M.,Yaffee S.L.Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2000.
57. Yin R.K.Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.