A novel high electrode count spike recording array using an 81,920 pixel transimpedance amplifier-based imaging chip

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 223-232

  Johnson, Lee J ^a   Cohen, Ethan ^b   Ilg, Doug ^c   Klein, Richard ^c   Skeath, Perry ^c   Scribner, Dean A ^d  

^a NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

^c Global Strategies Group (NA) Inc   (United States)

^d Northrop Grumman Information Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrical imaging; Electroretinogram; High resolution; Neuronal spikes; Recording electrode array

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFIER; ARTICLE; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRODE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; IMAGING CHIP; IMAGING SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPIKE; TRANSIMPEDANCE AMPLIFIER;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AMPLIFIERS, ELECTRONIC; ANIMALS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROELECTRODES; RABBITS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS;

EID: 84856977998     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ames A., Nesbett F.B. In vitro retina as an experimental model of the central nervous system. J Neurochem 1981, 37:867-877.
2. Caldwell J.H., Daw N.W. New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 1978, 276:257-276.
3. Cohen E.D. Interactions of inhibition and excitation in the light-evoked currents of X type retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 1998, 80:2975.
4. Cohen E.D., Miller R.F. The network-selective actions of quinoxalines on the neurocircuitry operations of the rabbit retina. Brain Res 1999, 12(831):206-228.
5. Cohen E.D. Effects of high-level pulse train stimulation on retinal function. J Neural Eng 2009, 6:035005.
6. Dagnelie G., Barnett D., Humayun M.S., Thompson R.W. Paragraph text reading using a pixelized prosthetic vision simulator: parameter dependence and task learning in free-viewing conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006, 47:1241-1250.
7. Devries S.H., Baylor D.A. Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol 1997, 78:2048-2060.
8. Doslak M.J., Plonsey R., Thomas C.W. The effects of variations of the conducting media inhomogeneities on the electroretinogram. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1980, 2:88-94.
9. Frey U., Egert U., Heer F., Hafizovic S., Hierlemann A. Microelectronic system for high-resolution mapping of extracellular electric fields applied to brain slices. Biosens Bioelectron 2009, 24:2191-2198.
10. Fuglevand A., Winter D., Patla A., Stashuk D. Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing. Biol Cybern 1992, 67:143-153.
11. Gross G.W., Rieske E., Kreutzberg G.W., Meyer A. A new fixed-array multi-microelectrode system designed for long-term monitoring of extracellular single unit neuronal activity in vitro. Neurosci Lett 1977, 6:101-105.
12. Hanitzsch R., Küppers L., Flade A. The effect of GABA and the GABA-uptake-blocker NO-711 on the b-wave of the ERG and the responses of horizontal cells to light. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004, 242:784-791.
13. Harris C.A., Passaro P.A., Kemenes I., Kemenes G., O'Shea M. Sensory driven multi-neuronal activity and associative learning monitored in an intact CNS on a multielectrode array. J Neurosci Methods 2010, 186:171-178.
14. Henze D.A., Borhegyi Z., Csicsvari J., Mamiya A., Harris K.D., Buzsaki G. Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84:390-400.
15. Holst O. Bacterial toxins: methods and protocols 2000, Humana Press.
16. Hutzler M., Lambacher A., Eversmann B., Jenkner M., Thewes R., Fromherz P. High-resolution multitransistor array recording of electrical field potentials in cultured brain slices. J Neurophysiol 2006, 96:1638-1645.
17. Imfeld K., Neukom S., Maccione A., Bornat Y., Martinoia S., Farine P-A., et al. Large-scale, high-resolution data acquisition system for extracellular recording of electrophysiological activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008, 55:2064-2073.
18. Johnson L., Scribner D., Skeath P., Klein R., Ilg D., Perkins K., et al. Impedance-based retinal contact imaging as an aid for the placement of high resolution epiretinal prostheses. J Neur Eng 2007, 4:S17-S23.
19. Kamondi A., Acsady L., Buzsaki G. Dendritic spikes are enhanced by cooperative network activity in the intact hippocampus. J Neurosci 1998, 18:3919-3928.
20. Karwoski C., Xu X. Current source-density analysis of light-evoked field potentials in rabbit retina. Vis Neurosci 1999, 16:369-377.
21. Keefer E.W., Botterman B.R., Romero M.I., Rossi A.F., Gross G.W. Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings. Nat Nanotech 2008, 3:434.
22. Litke A.M., Bezayiff N., Chichilnisky E.J., Cunningham W., Dabrowski W., Grillo A.A., et al. What does the eye tell the brain? Development of a system for the large-scale recording of retinal output activity. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2004, 51:1434-1440.
23. Litke A., Meister M. The retinal readout array. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 1991, 310:389-394.
24. Massey S.C., Miller R.F. Glutamate receptors of ganglion cells in the rabbit retina: evidence for glutamate as a bipolar cell transmitter. J Physiol 1988, 405:635-655.
25. McClintock R., Mayes K., Yasan A., Shiell D., Kung P., Razeghi M. 320×256 solar-blind focal plane arrays based on AlGaN. Appl Phys Lett 2005, 86:011117.
26. Meister M., Pine Jerome Baylor D.A. Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis. J Neurosci Methods 1994, 51:95-106.
27. Najafi K., Wise K.D., Mochizuki T. A high-yield IC-compatible multichannel recording array. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 1985, 32:1206-1211.
28. Quiroga R.Q., Nadasdy Z., Ben-Shaul Y. Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput 2004, 16:1661-1687.
29. Regehr W.G., Pine J., Cohan C.S., Mischke M.D., Tank D.W. Sealing cultured invertebrate neurons to embedded dish electrodes facilitates long-term stimulation and recording. J Neurosci Methods 1989, 30:91-106.
30. Selvin P.R. Single-molecule techniques: a laboratory manual 2008, CSHL Press.
31. Skeath P., Perkins F.K., Wasserman L., Schoonmaker R., Peele J., Johnson L., et al. Electroformed microelectrode array for a human retinal prosthesis interface. Proc. Conf. 206th Meeting Electrochem. Soc., Microfabric. Syst. and MEMS VII 2004, 1-9.
32. Scribner D., Johnson L., Skeath P., Klein R., Ilg D., Wasserman L., et al. A retinal prosthesis technology based on CMOS microelectronics and microwire glass electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 2007, 1:73-84.
33. Stenger D.A., Gross Guenter W., Keefer Edward W., Shaffer K.M., Andreadis J.D., Ma W., et al. Detection of physiologically active compounds using cell-based biosensors. Trends Biotechnol 2001, 19:304-309.
34. Straw A.D. Vision egg: an open-source library for realtime visual stimulus generation. Front Neuroinform 2008, 2:4.
35. Strickholm A. A hybrid patch clamp amplifier. J Neurosci Methods 1989, 29:59-67.
36. Theyel B.B., Lee C.C., Sherman S.M. Specific and non-specific thalamocortical connectivity in the auditory and somatosensory thalamocortical slices. Neuroreport 2010, 21:861-864.
37. Weerakoon P., Culurciello E., Klemic K.G., Sigworth F.J. An integrated patch-clamp potentiostat with electrode compensation. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 2009, 3:117-125.