Current source-density analysis of light-evoked field potentials in rabbit retina

Visual Neuroscience

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 369-377

  Karwoski, Chester J ^a   Xu, Xijing ^a  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

Current source density; Electroretinogram; Muller cell; Retina

Indexed keywords

2 AMINO 4 PHOSPHONOBUTYRIC ACID; 2-AMINO-4-PHOSPHONOBUTYRIC ACID; AMINO ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; AMINO ACID RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; AMINOBUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BARIUM CHLORIDE; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; CHLORIDE; KYNURENIC ACID; PICROTOXIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; LIGHT; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; RETINA;

AMINOBUTYRIC ACIDS; ANIMALS; BARIUM COMPOUNDS; CHLORIDES; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID ANTAGONISTS; KYNURENIC ACID; LIGHT; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PICROTOXIN; RABBITS; RETINA;

EID: 0033103449     PISSN: 09525238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952523899162163     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BAKER, C.L., HESS, R.R., OLSEN, B.T. & ZRENNER, E. (1988). Current source density analysis of linear and non-linear components of the primate electroretinogram. Journal of Physiology 407, 155-176.
2. BOLNICK, D.A, WALTER, A.E. & SILLMAN, A.J. (1979). Barium suppresses slow PIII in perfused bullfrog retina. Vision Research 19, 1117-1119.
3. BURKHARDT, D.A. (1972). Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine upon electrical activity of the proximal retina. Brain Research 43, 246-249.
4. DE ROUCK, A.F. (1991). History of the electroretinogram. In Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, ed. HECKENLIVELY, J.R. & ARDEN, G.B., pp. 5-13. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
5. + activity modulations in the vertebrate retina: Origins of electroretinographic components. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.
6. FABER, D.S. (1969). Analysis of the slow trans-retinal potentials in response to light. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.
7. FRISHMAN, L.J. & KARWOSKI, C.J. (1991). The d-wave. In Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, ed. HECKENLIVELY, J.R. & ARDEN, G.B., pp. 112-114. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
8. o in proximal portion of light-adapted cat retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 67, 1201-1212.
9. GRIFF, E.R. (1991). Electroretinographic components arising in the distal retina. In Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, ed. HECKENLIVELY, J.R. & ARDEN, G.B., pp. 91-98. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
10. 2 and APB on the light-induced potassium changes and the ERG b-wave of the isolated superfused rat retina. Vision Research 36, 499-507.
11. HEYNEN, H. & VAN NORREN, D. (1985). Origin of the electroretinogram in the intact macaque eye: II. Current source-density analysis. Vision Research 25, 709-715.
12. KARWOSKI, C.J., LU, H.-K. & NEWMAN, E.A. (1989a). Spatial buffering of light-evoked potassium increases by retinal Müller (glial) cells. Science 244, 578-580.
13. + flux in frog retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 61, 939-952.
14. KARWOSKI, C.J., FRAMBACH, D.A. & PROENZA, L.M. (1985). Laminar profile of resistivity in frog retina. Journal of Neurophysiology 54, 1607-1619.
15. KARWOSKI, C.J. & PROENZA, L.M. (1977). Relationship between Müller cell responses, a local transretinal potential, and potassium flux. Journal of Neurophysiology 40, 244-259.
16. KARWOSKI, C.J., Xu, X. & Yu, H. (1996). Current-source density analysis of the electroretinogram of the frog: Methodological issues and origins of components. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 13, 549-556.
17. KATZ, B.J., WEN, R., ZHENG, J., XU. Z. & OAKELY, B. (1991). M-wave of the toad electroretinogram. Journal of Neurophysiology 66, 1927-1940.
18. LINN, D.M., SOLESSIO, E., PERLMAN, I. & LASATER, E.M. (1998). The role of potassium conductance in the generation of light responses in Müller cells of the turtle retina. Visual Neuroscience 15, 449-458.
19. LUKASIEWICZ, P.D. & SHIELDS, C.R. (1998). A diversity of GABA receptors in the retina. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 9, 293-299.
20. MILLER, R.F. & DACHEUX, R.F. (1973). Information processing in the retina: Importance of chloride ions. Science 121, 266-268.
21. NEWMAN, E.A. (1987). Distribution of potassium conductance in mammalian Müller (glial) cells. A comparative study. Journal of Neuroscience 7, 2423-2432.
22. NEWMAN, E.A. (1989). Potassium conductance block by barium in amphibian Müller cells. Brain Research 498, 308-314.
23. + siphoning. Science 225, 1174-1175.
24. NEWMAN, E.A. & FRISHMAN, L.J. (1991). The b-wave. In Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiohgy of Vision, ed. HECKENLIVELY, J.R. & ARDEN, G.B., pp. 101-111. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
25. ROBSON, J.G. & FRISHMAN, L.J. (1996). Photoreceptor and bipolar cell contributions to the cat electroretinogram: A kinetic model for the early part of the flash response. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 13, 613-622.
26. SIEVING, P.A., MURAYAMA, K. & NAARENDORP, F. (1994). Push-pull model of the primate photopic electroretinogram: A role for hyperpolarizing neurons in shaping the d-wave. Visual Neuroscience 11, 519-532.
27. SIEVING, P.A. & STEINBERG, R.H. (1987). Proximal retinal contribution to the intraretinal 8-Hz pattern ERG of cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 57, 104-120.
28. STEINBERG, R.H., LINSENMEIER, R.A. & GRIFF, E.R. (1985). Retinal pigment epithelial cell contributions to the electroretinogram and electrooculogram. Progress in Retinal Research 4, 33-66.
29. STOCKTON, R.A. & SLAUGHTER, M.M. (1989). The b-wave of the electroretinogram: A reflection of ON bipolar cell activity. Journal of General Physiology 39, 101-122.
30. +-evoked Müller cell depolarization generates b-wave of electroretinogram in toad retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 87, 2117-2121.
31. XU, X. & KARWOSKI, C.J. (1994a). Current source density (CSD) analysis of retinal field potentials: I. Methodological considerations and depth profiles. Journal of Neurophysiology 72, 84-95.
32. XU, X. & KARWOSKI, C.J. (1994b). Current source density (CSD) analysis of retinal field potentials: II. Pharmacological analysis of the b-wave and M-wave. Journal of Neurophysiology 72, 96-105.
33. XU, X. & KARWOSKI, C.J. (1995). Current source density analysis of the electroretinographic d-wave. Journal of Neurophysiology 73, 2459-2469.
34. XU, X. & KARWOSKI, C.J. (1997). The origin of slow PIII in frog retina: Current source density analysis in the eyecup and isolated retina. Visual Neuroscience 14, 827-833.
35. XU, X., XU, J., HUANG, B., LIVSEY, C.T. & KARWOSKI, C.J. (1991). Comparison of pharmacological agents (aspartate vs. aminophosphonobutyric plus kynurenic acids) to block synaptic transmission from retinal photoreceptors in frog. Experimental Eye Research 52, 691-698.
36. ZEUMER, C., HANITSZCH, R. & MATTIG, W.-U. (1994). The c-wave of the electroretinogram possesses a third component from the proximal retina. Vision Research 34, 2673-2678.
37. ZUCKER, C.L. & EHINGER, B. (1998). Gamma-aminobutyric acid (A) receptors on a bistratified amacrine cell type in the rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 393, 309-319.