Demographic futures as a guide to planning: California's latinos and the compact city

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 383-397

  Myers, Dowell ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; FUTURE PROSPECT; LATINO PEOPLE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; URBAN POPULATION;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035187478     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360108976247     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bank of America. 1995. Beyond sprawl:New patterns of growth to fit the new California, San Francisco:Author.
2. California Department of Finance. 1998. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1970–2040, Sacramento, CA:Author.
3. California Department of Housing and Community Development. 2000. Raising the roof, Sacramento, CA:Author.
4. Cole, S., 2001. Dare to dream:Bringing futures into planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67:372–383.
5. Construction Industry Research Board of California. 1990–1999. Annual report—California building permits by city and county, all counties [Electronic data file], Burbank, CA:Author.
6. Crane, R., 1997. Sprawl I hardly knew ye. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63:278–279.
7. Day, J. C., and Curry, A. E., 1998. Educational attainment in the United States:March 1998, update, (Current Population Reports No. P20–513) Washington, DC:U.S. Census Bureau.
8. Downs, A., August 1 2000. California's housing policies create slums August 1, [On-line]. Available:
9. Gans, H. J., 1962. The urban villagers, New York:Free Press of Glencoe.
10. Gordon, P., and Richardson, H., 1998. Prove it:The costs and benefits of sprawl. Brookings Review,:23–25. Fall
11. Hirschman, C., Kasinitz, P., and DeWind, J., 1999. “ Immigrant adaptation, assimilation, and incorporation ”. In The handbook of international migration, Edited by:Hirschman, C., Kasnitz, P., and DeWind, J., 127–136. New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E., 1999. Consensus building as role playing and bricolage:Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65:9–26.
13. Isserman, A., 1985. Dare to plan:An essay on the role of the future in planning practice and education. Town Planning Review, 56:483–491.
14. Johnson, H., 1999. How many Californians? A review of population projections for the state. California counts, (Report No. 1), vol. 1, San Francisco:Public Policy Institute of California.
15. Johnson, H., 2000. Trends in family and household poverty. California counts, vol. 1, San Francisco:Public Policy Institute of California. (Report No. 3)
16. Keyfitz, N., 1987. “ The social and political context of population forecasting ”. In The politics of numbers, Edited by:William, A., and Starr, P., 235–258. New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Markusen, A., 1998. “ The future of planning:Gains for the craft, threats to the philosophy ”. In 50 years of city and regional planning at UC Berkeley, Edited by:Lowney, S., and Landis, J. D., 293–301. Berkeley:University of California Press.
18. Myers, D., Baer, W. C., and Choi, S., 1996. The changing problem of overcrowded housing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62:66–84.
19. Myers, D., Changes over time in transportation mode for journey to work:Effects of aging and immigration. In Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings. Decennial census data for transportation planning, volume 2:Case studies. pp. 84–99. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
20. Myers, D., 1999. “ Upward mobility in space and time:Lessons from immigration ”. In America's demographic tapestry, Edited by:Hughes, J. W., and Seneca, J. J., 135–157. New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
21. Myers, D., 2000. “ Building the future as a process in time ”. In Metropolitan Development Patterns, Edited by:LeRoyer, A., 62–65. Cambridge, MA:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
22. Myers, D., and Kitsuse, A., 2000. Constructing the future in planning:A survey of theories and tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:221–231.
23. Myers, D., and Menifee, L., 2000. “ Population analysis ”. In The practice of local government planning, Edited by:Dalton, L., Hoch, C., and So, F., 61–84. Washington, DC:International City/County Management Association.
24. Ong, P., 1989. The widening divide (Project report), Los Angeles:UCLA School of Architecture and Planning.
25. Pader, E., 1994. Spatial relations and housing policy:Regulations that discriminate against Mexican-origin households. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13:119–135.
26. Peattie, L., 1994. An argument for slums. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13:136–142.
27. Pitkin, J., 2000. Projection of the California population by nativity and duration (Project report), Los Angeles:USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development.
28. Reed, D., 1999. California's rising income inequality:Causes and concerns, San Francisco:Public Policy Institute of California.
29. Rein, M., and Schon, D., 1977. “ Problem-setting in policy research ”. In Using social research for public policy, Edited by:Weiss, C., 4–5. Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
30. Rodriguez, G., 1997. The emerging Latino middle class, Malibu, CA:Pepperdine University.
31. Salins, P. D., 1997. Assimilation, American style, New York:Basic Books.
32. Scott, A. J., 1996. “ The manufacturing economy:Ethnic and gender divisions of labor ”. In Ethnic Los Angeles, Edited by:Waldinger, R., and Bozorgmehr, M., 215–244. New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
33. Throgmorton, J. A., 1992. Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12:17–31.
34. Throgmorton, J. A., 2000. On the virtues of skillful meandering:Acting as a skilled-voice-in-the-flow of persuasive argumentation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66:367–379.
35. U. S. Census Bureau. 1993. 1990 Public use microdata samples:Technical documentation, Washington, DC:Author.
36. U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Census 2000 brief:The Hispanic population, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Commerce.
37. Vernez, G., and Abrahamse, A., 1996. How immigrants fare in U.S. education, Santa Monica, CA:RAND Corporation.
38. Wachs, M., 2001. Forecasting versus envisioning:A new window on the future. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67:367–372.
39. Waldinger, R., and Bozorgmehr, M., eds. 1996. Ethnic Los Angeles, New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
40. Wells Fargo Bank. 1996. Preserving the American dream:The truth about suburban communities and housing choice, San Francisco:Author.
41. Zhou, M., 1997. “ Segmented assimilation:Issues, controversies, and recent research on the second generation ”. In The handbook of international migration, Edited by:Hirschman, C., Kasinitz, P., and DeWind, J., 196–211. New York:Russell Sage Foundation.