Enhancing a GIS cellular automata model of land use change: Bayesian networks, influence diagrams and causality

Transactions in GIS

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 681-702

  Kocabas, Verda ^a   Dragicevic, Suzana ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian Networks; Cellular Automata; Geographic Information Systems (GIS); Influence Diagrams; Land Use Change; Spatial Modeling

Indexed keywords

BARIUM COMPOUNDS; CELLULAR AUTOMATA; DECISION THEORY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; LAND USE;

BAYESIA N NETWORKS; CELLULAR AUTOMATA MODELS; CELLULAR AUTOMATONS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFLUENCE DIAGRAM; LANDUSE CHANGE; NETWORK INFLUENCES; SPATIAL MODELLING; SUBMODELS; TRANSITION RULE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; DIAGRAM; GIS; LAND USE CHANGE; PROBABILITY; SPATIAL PLANNING;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 35448987358     PISSN: 13611682     EISSN: 14679671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01066.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aalders I H and Aitkenhead M J 2006 Agricultural census data and land use modelling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 30: 799-814
2. Allen P M 1997 Cities and regions as evolutionary complex systems. Geographical Systems 4: 103-30
3. Arai T and Akiyama T 2004 Empirical analysis for estimating land use transition potential functions-case in the Tokyo metropolitan region. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28: 65-84
4. Arai T, Masuda H, and Tanaka S 2005 A simplified CA and Markov model of land-use dynamics in a suburb of the Tokyo metropolitan region. In Proceedings of the Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Conference, London, England
5. Barredo J I, Demicheli L, Lavalle C, Kasanko M, and McCormick N 2004 Modelling future urban scenarios in developing countries: An application case study in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Planning B 32: 65-84
6. Batty M 2005 Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-based Models, and Fractals. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
7. Batty M and Torrens P M 2005 Modeling and prediction in a complex world. Futures 37: 745-66
8. Benenson I and Torrens P M 2004 Geosimulation: Automata-based Modelling of Urban Phenomena. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons
9. Bromley J, Jackson N A, Clymer O J, Giacomello A M, and Jensen F V 2005 The use of Hugin® to develop Bayesian Networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environmental Modeling and Software 20: 231-42
10. Cheng J, Greiner R, Kelly J, Bell D, and Liu W R 2002 Learning Bayesian networks from data: An information-theory based approach. Artificial Intelligence 137: 43-90
11. Cooper G F and Herskovits E 1992 A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning 9: 309-47
12. Dorner S, Shi J, and Swayne D 2007 Multi-objective modelling and decision support using a Bayesian network approximation to a non-point source pollution model. Environmental Modelling and Software 22: 211-22
13. Druzdzel M J and Simon H A 1993 Causality in Bayesian Networks. In Heckerman D and Mamdani E H (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Conference. San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann: 3-11
14. Engelen G, White R, and De Nijs T 2003 Environment Explorer: Spatial support system for the integrated assessment of socio-economic and environmental policies in the Netherlands. Integrated Assessment 4: 97-105
15. ESRI 2007 GIS and Mapping Software. WWW document, http://www.esri.com
16. GeoBase 2007 GeoBase: Building on Common Ground. WWW document, http://www.geobase.ca
17. GVRD 2007 Greater Vancouver Regional District. WWW document, http://www.gvrd.bc.ca/about/index.htm
18. Heckerman D, Mamdani A, and Wellman M P 1995 Real-world applications of Bayesian Networks: Introduction. Communications of the ACM 38: 24-6
19. Henriksen H J, Rasmussen P, Brandt G, von Bulow D, and Jensen F V 2007 Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environmental Modelling and Software 22: 1101-13
20. Howard R A and Matheson J E 1983 Influence diagrams. In Howard R A and Matheson J E (eds) Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Menlo Park, CA, Strategic Decisions Group: 719-62
21. Jenerette G D and Wu J G 2001 Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona-Phoenix region, USA. Landscape Ecology 16: 611-26
22. Jensen F V 2001 Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. New York, Springer
23. Jordan M I and Sejnowski T J 2001 Graphical Models: Foundations of Neural Computation. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press
24. Kocabas V and Dragicevic S 2006 Coupling Bayesian networks with GIS-based cellular automata for modeling land use change. In Raubal M, Miller H, Frank A, and Goodchild M F (eds) Geographic Information Science. Berlin, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science No 4197: 217-33
25. Lauritzen S and Spiegelhalter D 1988 Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems. Journal of Royal Statistical Society B 50: 157-224
26. Little L R, Kuikka S, Punt A E, Pantus F, Davies C R, and Mapstone B D 2004 Information flow among fishing vessels modelled using a Bayesian network. Environmental Modelling and Software 19: 27-34
27. Liu X and Andersson C 2004 Assessing the impact of temporal dynamics on land-use change modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28: 107-24
28. Ma L, Arentze T, Borgers A, and Timmermans H 2005 Alternative methods of causal inference in a multi-agent model of land use decisions under conditions of uncertainty. In Proceedings of the Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Conference, London, England
29. Manson S M 2007 Challenges in evaluating models of geographic complexity. Environment and Planning B 34: 245-60
30. Marcot B G, Holthausen R S, Raphael M G, Rowland M M, and Wisdom M J 2001 Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement. Forest Ecology and Management 153: 29-42
31. Maria de Almeida C, Batty M, Vieira Monteiro A M, Camara G, Soares-Filho B S, Cerqueira G C, and Pennachin C L 2003 Stochastic cellular automata modeling of urban land use dynamics: Empirical development and estimation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27: 481-509
32. Maria de Almeida C, Monteiro A M V, Soares G C B S, Cerqueira G C, Pennachin C L, and Batty M 2005 GIS and remote sensing as tools for the simulation of urban land-use change. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26: 759-74
33. Mathworks 2007 Getting Started with Matlab. WWW document, http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf_doc/matlab/getstart.pdf
34. Murphy K 2001 The Bayes net toolbox for Matlab. Computing Science and Statistics 33: 331-50
35. Neapolitan R E 2003 Learning Bayesian Networks. Harlow, Prentice Hall
36. O'Sullivan D 2001 Graph-based cellular automata: A generalized discrete urban and regional model. Environment and Planning B 28: 687-705
37. Pearl J 1988 Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann
38. Pearl J 2000 Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York, Cambridge University Press
39. Portugali J, Benenson I, and Omer I 1997 Spatial cognitive dissonance and sociospatial emergence in a self-organizing city. Environment and Planning B 24: 263-85
40. Scuderi M and Clifton K J 2004 Bayesian approaches to learning from data: Using NHTS data for the analysis of land use and transportation. In Proceedings of the National Household Travel Survey: Understanding Our Nation's Travel Conference, Washington, DC
41. Statistics-Canada 2007 Canada's National Statistical Agency. WWW document, http://www.statcan.ca
42. Verburg P H, de Nijs T C M, Ritsema van Eck J, Visser H, and de Jong K 2004 A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28: 667-90
43. Yeh A G O and Li X 2003 Simulation of development alternatives using neural networks, cellular automata, and GIS for urban planning. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69: 1043-52