Erratum: Rapid microsatellite identification from illumina paired-end genomic sequencing in two birds and a snake(PLoS ONE 7:2(e30953) 10.1371/journal.pone.0030953);Rapid microsatellite identification from illumina paired-end genomic sequencing in two birds and a snake

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Castoe, Todd A ^a   Poole, Alexander W ^a   de Koning, A P Jason ^a   Jones, Kenneth L ^a   Tomback, Diana F ^b   Oyler McCance, Sara J ^c   Fike, Jennifer A ^c   Lance, Stacey L ^d   Streicher, Jeffrey W ^e   Smith, Eric N ^e   Pollock, David D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c FORT COLLINS SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ARTICLE; BIRD; CENTROCERCUS MINIMUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE LOCUS; GENOME ANALYSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HYBRIDIZATION; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NONHUMAN; NUCIFRAGA COLUMBIANA; PAIRED END GENOMIC SEQUENCING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PYTHON MOLURUS BIVITTATUS; RELIABILITY; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT; SNAKE; SPECIES COMPARISON; ANIMAL; ECONOMICS; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT;

AVES; CENTROCERCUS MINIMUS; NUCIFRAGA COLUMBIANA; PYTHON MOLURUS BIVITTATUS;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; GENOME; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; SNAKES;

EID: 84856934143     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136465     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. Abdelkrim J, Robertson B, Stanton JA, Gemmell N, (2009) Fast, cost-effective development of species-specific microsatellite markers by genomic sequencing. Biotechniques 46: 185-192.
2. Allentoft M, Schuster SC, Holdaway R, Hale M, McLay E, et al. (2009) Identification of microsatellites from an extinct moa species using high-throughput (454) sequence data. Biotechniques 46: 195-200.
3. Meglecz E, Costedoat C, Dubut V, Gilles A, Malausa T, et al. (2010) QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics 26: 403-404.
4. Faircloth BC, (2008) msatcommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 92-94.
5. Castoe TA, Poole AW, Gu W, de Koning APJ, Daza JM, et al. (2010) Rapid identification of thousands of copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix) microsatellite loci from modest amounts of 454 shotgun genome sequence. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 341-347.
6. Castoe TA, Bronikowski AM, Brodie ED III, Edwards SV, Pfrender ME, et al. (2011) A proposal to sequence the genome of a garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis). Stand Genomic Sci 4: 257-270.
7. Castoe TA, Hall KT, Guibotsy Mboulas ML, Gu W, de Koning APJ, et al. (2011) Discovery of highly divergent repeat landscapes in snake genomes using high throughput sequencing. Genome Biol Evol 3: 641-653.
8. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432: 695-716.
9. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, Arnold AP, Hillier LW, et al. (2010) The genome of a songbird. Nature 464: 757-762.
10. Gibbons JG, Janson EM, Hittinger CT, Johnston M, Abbot P, et al. (2009) Benchmarking next-generation transcriptome sequencing for functional and evolutionary genomics. Mol Biol Evol 26: 2731-2744.
11. Rozen S, Skaletsky H, (2000) Primer3 on the World Wide Web for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S, editors. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology Totowa, New Jersey Humana Press pp. 365-386.
12. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, et al. (2005) Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res 110: 462-467.
13. De Smet WHO, (1981) The nuclear Feulgen-DNA content of the vertebrates (especially reptiles), as measured by fluorescence cytophotometry, with notes on the cell and chromosome size. Acta Zoologica et Pathologica Antverpiensia 76: 119-167.
14. Gregory TR, Nicol JA, Tamm H, Kullman B, Kullman K, et al. (2007) Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D332-338.
15. Castoe TA, de Koning APJ, Hall KT, Yokoyama KD, Gu W, et al. (2011) Sequencing the genome of the Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus) as a model for studying extreme adaptations in snakes. Genome Biol 12: 406.
16. Hughes AL, Piontkivska H, (2005) DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size. BMC Evol Biol 5: 12.
17. Shedlock AM, Botka CW, Zhao S, Shetty J, Zhang T, et al. (2007) Phylogenomics of nonavian reptiles and the structure of the ancestral amniote genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 2767-2772.
18. Jennings TN, Knaus BJ, Mullins TD, Haig SM, Cronn RC, (2011) Multiplexed microsatellite recovery using massively parallel sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour.
19. Kelkar YD, Tyekucheva S, Chiaromonte F, Makova KD, (2008) The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution. Genome Res 18: 30-38.
20. Buschiazzo E, Gemmell NJ, (2006) The rise, fall and renaissance of microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Bioessays 28: 1040-1050.