Anatomical correlates of dynamic auditory processing: Relationship to literacy during early adolescence

NeuroImage

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 1287-1295

  Sutherland, Mary Elizabeth ^a,b   Zatorre, Robert J ^a,b   Watkins, Kate E ^d   Hervé, Pierre Yves ^c   Leonard, Gabriel ^a   Pike, Bruce G ^a   Witton, Caroline ^f   Paus, Tomáš ^a,e  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BRAMS Laboratory   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTEER; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; READING; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84856932825     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.051     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ahissar M., Protopapas A., Reid M., Merzenich M.M. Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97(12):6832-6837.
2. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry - the methods. NeuroImage 2000, 11(6 Pt 1):805-821.
3. Au A., Lovegrove B. The contribution of rapid visual and auditory processing to the reading of irregular words and pseudowords presented singly and in contiguity. Percept. Psychophys. 2007, 69(8):1344-1359.
4. Au A., Lovegrove B. The reading ability of good and poor temporal processors among a group of college students. Percept. Psychophys. 2008, 70(4):697-706.
5. Bishop D.V., Carlyon R.P., Deeks J.M., Bishop S.J. Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 1999, 42(6):1295-1310.
6. Bitan T., Lifshitz A., Breznitz Z., Booth J.R. Bidirectional connectivity between hemispheres occurs at multiple levels in language processing but depends on sex. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(35):11576-11585.
7. Boemio A., Fromm S., Braun A., Poeppel D. Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8(3):389-395.
8. Boets B., Wouters J., van Wieringen A., De Smedt B., Ghesquiere P. Modelling relations between sensory processing, speech perception, orthographic and phonological ability, and literacy achievement. Brain Lang. 2008, 106(1):29-40.
9. Brancucci A., D'Anselmo A., Martello F., Tommasi L. Left hemisphere specialization for duration discrimination of musical and speech sounds. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):2013-2019.
10. Brechmann A., Scheich H. Hemispheric shifts of sound representation in auditory cortex with conceptual listening. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15(5):578-587.
11. Cocosco C.A., Zijdenbos A.P., Evans A.C. A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method. Med. Image Anal. 2003, 7(4):513-527.
12. Davatzikos C., Resnick S.M. Sex differences in anatomic measures of interhemispheric connectivity: correlations with cognition in women but not men. Cereb. Cortex 1998, 8(7):635-640.
13. Dorn L.D., Susman E.J., Nottelmann E.D., Inoff-Germain G., Chrousos G.P. Perceptions of puberty: Adolescent, parent, and health care personnel. Dev. Psychol. 1990, 26(2):322-329.
14. Fine C. From Scanner to Sound Bite. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 19(5):280-283.
15. Foster N.E., Zatorre R.J. Cortical structure predicts success in performing musical transformation judgments. NeuroImage 2010, 53(1):26-36.
16. Giraud A.L., Kleinschmidt A., Poeppel D., Lund T.E., Frackowiak R.S., Laufs H. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 2007, 56(6):1127-1134.
17. Golestani N., Molko N., Dehaene S., LeBihan D., Pallier C. Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17(3):575-582.
18. Hornickel J., Skoe E., Kraus N. Subcortical laterality of speech encoding. Audiol. Neurootol. 2009, 14(3):198-207.
19. Hough M.S., Daniel H.J., Snow M.A., O'Brien K.F., Hume W.G. Gender differences in laterality patterns for speaking and singing. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32(9):1067-1078.
20. Hyde K.L., Lerch J., Norton A., Forgeard M., Winner E., Evans A.C., et al. Musical training shapes structural brain development. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(10):3019-3025.
21. Jamison H.L., Watkins K.E., Bishop D.V., Matthews P.M. Hemispheric specialization for processing auditory nonspeech stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16(9):1266-1275.
22. Kaernbach C. Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Percept. Psychophys. 1991, 49(3):227-229.
23. Lenroot R.K., Gogtay N., Greenstein D.K., Wells E.M., Wallace G.L., Clasen L.S., et al. Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage 2007, 36(4):1065-1073.
24. Okamoto H., Stracke H., Draganova R., Pantev C. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked fields elicited by spectral versus temporal stimulus change. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19(10):2290-2297.
25. Paus T. Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9(2):60-68.
26. Paus T., Keshavan M., Giedd J.N. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?. Nat. Rev. 2008, 9(12):947-957.
27. Penhune V.B., Zatorre R.J., MacDonald J.D., Evans A.C. Interhemispheric anatomical differences in human primary auditory cortex: probabilistic mapping and volume measurement from magnetic resonance scans. Cereb. Cortex 1996, 6(5):661-672.
28. Perrin J.S., Leonard G., Perron M., Pike G.B., Pitiot A., Richer L., et al. Sex differences in the growth of white matter during adolescence. NeuroImage 2009, 45(4):1055-1066.
29. Petersen A.C., Crockett L., Richards M., Boxer A. A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity, and initial norms. J. Youth Adolesc. 1988, 17(2):117-133.
30. Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111(2):220-236.
31. Poulsen C., Picton T.W., Paus T. Age-related changes in transient and oscillatory brain responses to auditory stimulation during early adolescence. Dev. Sci. 2009, 12(2):220-235.
32. Rademacher J., Morosan P., Schormann T., Schleicher A., Werner C., Freund H.J., et al. Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. NeuroImage 2001, 13(4):669-683.
33. Sandmann P., Eichele T., Specht K., Jancke L., Rimol L.M., Nordby H., et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in the processing of temporal acoustic cues in consonant-vowel syllables. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2007, 25(3-4):227-240.
34. Sandu A.L., Specht K., Beneventi H., Lundervold A., Hugdahl K. Sex-differences in gray-white matter structure in normal-reading and dyslexic adolescents. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 438(1):80-84.
35. Schonwiesner M., Rubsamen R., von Cramon D.Y. Hemispheric asymmetry for spectral and temporal processing in the human antero-lateral auditory belt cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 22(6):1521-1528.
36. Shaywitz B.A., Shaywitz S.E., Pugh K.R., Constable R.T., Skudlarski P., Fulbright R.K., et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 1995, 373(6515):607-609.
37. Sigalovsky I.S., Fischl B., Melcher J.R. Mapping an intrinsic MR property of gray matter in auditory cortex of living humans: a possible marker for primary cortex and hemispheric differences. NeuroImage 2006, 32(4):1524-1537.
38. Sled J.G., Zijdenbos A.P., Evans A.C. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1998, 17(1):87-97.
39. Talcott J.B., Witton C., Hebb G.S., Stoodley C.J., Westwood E.A., France S.J., et al. On the relationship between dynamic visual and auditory processing and literacy skills; results from a large primary-school study. Dyslexia 2002, 8(4):204-225.
40. Talcott J.B., Witton C., McLean M.F., Hansen P.C., Rees A., Green G.G., et al. Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97(6):2952-2957.
41. Warrier C., Wong P., Penhune V., Zatorre R., Parrish T., Abrams D., et al. Relating structure to function: Heschl's gyrus and acoustic processing. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(1):61-69.
42. Witton C., Stein J.F., Stoodley C.J., Rosner B.S., Talcott J.B. Separate influences of acoustic AM and FM sensitivity on the phonological decoding skills of impaired and normal readers. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14(6):866-874.
43. Witton C., Talcott J.B., Hansen P.C., Richardson A.J., Griffiths T.D., Rees A., et al. Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8(14):791-797.
44. Wong P.C., Warrier C.M., Penhune V.B., Roy A.K., Sadehh A., Parrish T.B., et al. Volume of left Heschl's Gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18(4):828-836.
45. Woodcock R.W., McGrew K.S., Mather N. Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement 2001, Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL.
46. Worsley K.J., Taylor J.E., Carbonell F., Chung M.K., Duerden E., Bernhardt B., et al. SurfStat: A Matlab toolbox for the statistical analysis of univariate and multivariate surface and volumetric data using linear mixed effects models and random field theory. NeuroImage 2009, 47(1):S102-S.
47. Zaehle T., Wustenberg T., Meyer M., Jancke L. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20(9):2447-2456.
48. Zatorre R.J., Belin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2001, 11(10):946-953.
49. Zatorre R.J., Belin P., Penhune V.B. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6(1):37-46.
50. Zatorre R.J., Gandour J.T. Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2008, 363(1493):1087-1104.