Quantitative investigation of forest conflicts using different data collection methods

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 130-142

  Mola Yudego, Blas ^a,b   Gritten, David ^a,c   Delgado Matas, Cristóbal ^a,d  

^a RECOFTC The Center for People and Forests   (Thailand)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c CENTRE TECNOLÒGIC FORESTAL DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^d European Union   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; forest conflicts; geostatistical analysis; Google

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC COMMUNITY; AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; BIBLIOMETRICS; CENTRAL ASIA; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DATA SETS; FOREST CONFLICTS; GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS; GOOGLE; NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS; QUALITATIVE RELATION; QUANTITATIVE INVESTIGATION;

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERNET;

FORESTRY;

DATA BASES; FORESTS; INTERNET;

EID: 84856845772     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.635081     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Atwood. L. E. 1985.Old colonial ties and news coverage of Africa.Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Convention. May 23-27. Honolulu. USA.
2. Bettencourt. J. & Jonard. F. 2007.Elaboration du profile environnemental du pays Guinee Bissau. p. 122 [Development of the environmental profile of Guinea Bissau]. Retrieved November 20, 2010, fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/Guinee_Bissau_CEP_2007.pdf
3. Chang, T. 1998. All countries not created equal to be news: World system and international communication. Communication Research, 25: 528-566.
4. Chinn, M. D. and Fairlie, R. W. 2006. The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and Internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers, 59: 16-44.
5. Druckman, D. 2005. Doing research: Methods of inquiry for conflict analysis, London: Sage Publications.
6. FAO 2000.Conflict and natural resource management. 21 pp. Italy: Rome.
7. FAO 2007.FAOSTAT statistical databases.Retrieved October 19, 2010, fromhttp://faostat.fao.org/
8. Gerber. J.-F. 2010.Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the South: Who, how and why? Global Environmental Change.doi:10.1016/ j.gloenvcha.2010.09.005
9. Glasl, F. 1999. Confronting conflict: A first-aid kit for handling conflict, Gloucestershire: Howthorn Press.
10. Gritten. D. & Kant. P. 2007.Assessing the impact of environmental campaigns against the activities of pulp and paper company in Indonesia.International Forestry Review. 9 4. 819 - 834.
11. Gritten. D. & Mola-Yudego. B. 2011.Exploration of the relevance of geographical, environmental and socio-economic indicators on forest conflict types.International Forestry Review. 13 1. 46 - 55.
12. Gritten, D. and Mola-Yudego, B. 2010. Blanket campaign: A response of environmental groups to the globalising forest industry. International Journal of the Commons, 4(2): 729-757.
13. Haacker, M. 2005. The ICT sector and the global economy: Counting the gains. The Global Information Technology Report 2004-2005, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
14. Heimeriks, G. and Vasileiadou, E. 2008. Changes or transition? Analysing the use of ICTs in sciences. Social Science Information, 47(1): 5-29.
15. Hellström, E. 2001. Conflict cultures - Qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in Forestry. Silva Fennica Monographs, 2: 109pp
16. Kameri-Mbote. P. 2005.Environment and conflict linkages in the Great Lakes Region.IELRC Working paper 2005-6. Retrieved November 13, 2010, fromhttp://www.ielrc.org/content/w0506.pdf
17. Krott, M. 2005. Forest policy analysis, The Netherlands: EFI/Springer.
18. Lind. J. & Sturman. K. 2002.Scarcity and surfeit: The ecology of Africa's conflicts. 159pp.Pretoria,. South Africa: Institute for Security Studies.
19. Mery. G.Alfaro. R.Kanninen. M. & Lobovikov. M. 2005.Forests in the global balance - Changing paradigms. IUFRO World Series Vol. 17.Helsinki: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.
20. Meyer. E. T.Park. H. W. & Schroeder. R. 2009.Mapping global e-research: Scientometrics and webometrics.Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on e-Social Science.June 24-26. Cologne. Germany.
21. Mol, A. P. J. 2006. Environmental governance in the information age: The emergence of informational governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(4): 497-514.
22. Mol, A. P. J. 2010. The future of transparency: Power, pitfalls and promises. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3): 132-143.
23. Mola-Yudego, B. and Gritten, D. 2010. Determining forest conflict hotspots according to academic and environmental groups. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(8): 575-580.
24. Polgreen, P. M., Chen, Y., Pennock, D., Nelson, F. and Weinstein, R. A. 2008. Using Internet searches for influenza surveillance. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 47(11): 1443-1448.
25. Putnam, L. L. 2007. The media as a stakeholder in framing public conflicts. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 13(4): 12-16.
26. Riggins, F. J. and Dewan, S. 2005. The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12): 298-337.
27. Rihoux, B. 2006. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology, 21(5): 679-706.
28. Thelwall, M. 2008. Extracting accurate and complete results from search engines: Case study of Windows Live. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1): 38-50.
29. Thelwall, M. 2009. Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval.and Services,1(1): 1-116.
30. Tian. T.Geller. J. & Chun. S. A. 2010.Predicting web search counts.Proceedings of 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. August 31-September 3.
31. Uka-Uche, L. 1991. Ideology, theory and professionalism in the African mass media. Africa Media Review, 5: 1-16.
32. Vasileiadou, E. and Vliegenthart, R. 2009. Research productivity in the era of the Internet revisited. Research Policy, 38(8): 1260-1268.
33. Walsh, J. P., Kucker, S., Maloney, N. G. and Gabbay, S. 2000. Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14): 1295-1305.
34. Yasmi. Y. 2007.Institutionalization of conflict capability in the management of natural resources: Theoretical perspectives and empirical experience in Indonesia.PhD dissertation. Wageningen University. The Netherlands.
35. Yasmi, Y., Colfer, C. J. P., Yuliani, L., Indriatmoko, Y. and Heri, V. 2007. Conflict management approaches under unclear boundaries of the commons: Experiences from Danau Sentarum National Park, Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 9(2): 597-609.
36. Yasmi, Y., Guernier, J. and Colfer, C. J. P. 2009. Positive and negative aspects of forestry conflict: lessons from a decentralized forest management in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 11(1): 98-110.
37. Yasmi. Y.Kelley. L. & Enters. T. 2010.Conflict over forests and land in Asia: Impacts, causes and management.Issue Paper. RECOFTC - The Center for People and Forests. Bangkok. Thailand. 24 pp.
38. Yasmi, Y., Schanz, H. and Salim, A. 2006. Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 9(6): 538-546.
39. Zhang. F.Feng. X. & Yuan. J.2011.Vertical Search Engines on Forestry.Advanced Materials Research 143 - 144 1270