Exploration of the relevance of geographical, environmental and socio-economic indicators regarding forest conflict types

International Forestry Review

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 46-55

  Gritten, D ^a,b   Mola Yudego, B ^b,c  

^a CENTRE TECNOLÒGIC FORESTAL DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Categorising forest conflicts; factor analysis; geospatial kernels; socio economic and environmental indicators

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; FACTOR ANALYSIS; FORESTRY; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATOR;

EID: 79955118441     PISSN: 14655489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1505/ifor.13.1.46     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AUTY, R. M. 2004. Natural resources and civil strife: a two-stage process. Geopolitics 9:29-49. (Pubitemid 38502625)
2. BOWYER, J. L. 2004. Changing realities in forest sector markets. Unasylva 55(219):59-64. (Pubitemid 40548928)
3. BUCKLES, D. and RUSNACK, G. 1999. Conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. In: (Ed.) Buckles, D. Cultivating peace: conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. International Research Centre, Canada. pp. 1-10.
4. BUHAUG, H. and P. LUJALA. 2005. Accounting for scale: Measuring geography in quantitative studies of civil war. Political Geography 24(4):399-418. (Pubitemid 40451337)
5. CASTRO, A. P. and NIELSEN, E. (2001). Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environmental Science and Policy. 4:229-239. (Pubitemid 33588514)
6. COLLIER, P. and HOEFFLER, A. 2004. Greed, Grievance, and Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series 56(4):563-595.
7. DE KONING, R. G., CAPISTRANO, D., YASMI, Y. and CERUTTI, P. O. 2008. Forest-related conflict: impacts, links and measures to mitigate. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington DC. 52 p.
8. ESTY, D. C., M. A. LEVY, C. H. KIM, A. de SHERBININ, T. SREBOTNJAK and V. MARA. 2008. 2008 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
9. FAO. 2000. Conflict and Natural Resource Management. Rome, Italy.
10. th October, 2009).
11. FAO. 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome) FAO Forestry Paper 147.
12. th October, 2009).
13. GLASL, F. 1999. Confronting conflict: a first-aid kit for handling conflict. Howthorn Press, Gloucestershire.
14. GRITTEN, D. and KANT. P. 2007. Assessing the impact of environmental campaigns against the activities of a pulp and paper company in Indonesia. International Forestry Review. 30(4):819-834.
15. GRITTEN, D., SAASTAMOINEN, O. and SAJAMA, S. 2009. Ethical analysis: A structured approach to facilitate the resolution of forest conflicts. Forest Policy and Economics 11:555-560.
16. GRITTEN, D. 2009. Facilitating resolution of forest conflicts through understanding the complexity of the relationship between forest industry and environmental groups. Dissertationes Forestales 91. 79 p.
17. GRITTEN, D. and MOLA-YUDEGO, B. 2010. Blanket campaign: A response of environmental groups to the globalising forest industry. International Journal of the Commons 4(2):729-757.
18. HELLSTRÖM, E. 2001. Conflict cultures - Qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in Forestry. Silva Fennica Monographs 2 2001.
19. HOMER-DIXON, T. 1999. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton University Press. 253 p.
20. IRLAND, L. C. 2008. State failure, corruption, and warfare: challenges for forest policy. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 27(3):189-223.
21. JACKSON, L. S. 2001. Contemporary public involvement: toward a strategic approach. Local Environment 6(2):35-147.
22. KONIJNENDIJK, C. C., RANDRUP, T. and NILSSON, K. 2000. Urban forestry research in Europe: An overview. Journal of Arboriculture 26(3):152-161.
23. KUCHELMEISTER, G. 2000. Trees for the urban millennium: urban forestry update. Unasylva 51(200):49-55. (Pubitemid 30172462)
24. KUCHELMEISTER, G. and BRAATZ, S. 1993. Urban forestry revisited. Unasylva 44(173):3-12.
25. MOLA-YUDEGO, B. and GRITTEN, D. (2010). Determining forest conflict hotspots according to academic and environmental groups. Forest Policy and Economics 12(8):575-580.
26. OECD. 2005. Forests and violent conflict. Development Assistance Committee (DAC), OECD Issues Brief. 8 p.
27. PALMER, C. 2003. The extent and causes of illegal logging: An analysis of a major cause of deforestation in Indonesia. CSERGE Working Paper 0967.
28. PELUSO, N. and WATTS, M. 2001. Violent Environments. Cornell University Press. 453 p.
29. RUSTAD, S. C. A. 2005. Forest resrouces and conflict. How forest resources influence internal armed conflicts. PhD thesis Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 109 p.
30. SCHMIDTZ, D. 2002. Natural enemies: An anatomy of environmental conflict. In: SCHMIDTZ, D. & WILLOTT, E. (eds.). Environmental ethics: What really matters, what really works, Oxford University Press, New York, USA. pp. 417-424.
31. SILVERMAN, B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC. 175 p.
32. TACCONI, L. 2007. Illegal logging: law enforcement, livelihoods and the timber trade. Earthscan/James & James. 301 p.
33. th October, 2009).
34. UNITED NATIONS. 2008. United Nations Development Programme 2008. Human Development Report 2007/2008. United Nations 399 p.
35. WILSON, E. 2009. Company-led approaches to conflict management in the forest sector. Research Paper No. 4, April 2009. The Forest Dialogue. USA.
36. WORLD BANK, 2008. Data and statistics. Retrieved at: http://web. worldbank.org (Jul, 2009).
37. WORTON, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70(1):164-168. (Pubitemid 20418153)
38. WORTON, B. J. 1995. Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. The Journal of Wildlife Management 59(4):794-800. (Pubitemid 26469993)
39. YASMI, Y., SCHANZ, H. and SALIM, A. 2006a. Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environmental Science & Policy 9(6):538-546. (Pubitemid 44227864)
40. YASMI, Y., ANSHARI, G. Z., KOMARUDIN, H. and ALQADRIE S. 2006b. Stakeholder conflicts and forest decentralization policies in West Kalimantan: their dynamics and implications for future forest management. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 16(2):167-180. (Pubitemid 44018796)
41. YASMI, Y. 2007. Institutionalization of conflict capability in the management of natural resources: theoretical perspectives and empirical experience in Indonesia. PhD Dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.