Gifted identification with Aurora: Widening the spotlight

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 117-133

  Kornilov, Sergey A ^a,b   Tan, Mei ^c,d   Elliott, Julian G ^e   Sternberg, Robert J ^f   Grigorenko, Elena L ^a,c,d  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^e DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ability; achievement; assessment; giftedness; successful intelligence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856808884     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734282911428199     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American competitiveness initiative: Leading the world in innovation. Washington, DC: Domestic Policy Council Office of Science and Technology; 2006:.
2. The Routledge international companion to gifted education. Balchin T.Hymer B.Matthews D. J., ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2009:.
3. Intellectual talent. Benbow C. P.Lubinski D., ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996:.
4. Binet A.,Simon T.Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux.L'Année Psychologique. 1905;11:191-244.
5. Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring. (2010). MidYIS assessments. Retrieved from http://www.midyisproject.org.
6. Chart H.,Grigorenko E. L.,Sternberg R. J.Critical issues and practices in gifted education. Plucker J. A.Callahan C. M., ed. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press; 2008:345-365.
7. De JongJ.LinacreM. (1993). Rasch estimation methods, statistical independence, and global fit. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt72n.htm.
8. DirectGov. (2009). National curriculum teacher assessments and key stage tests. Retrieved from http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Parents/Schoolslearninganddevelopment/ExamsTestsAndTheCurriculum/DG_10013041.
9. Heller K. A.The nature and development of giftedness: A longitudinal study.European Journal for High Ability. 1991;2:174-188.
10. Heller K. A.Fostering the growth of high ability: European perspectives. Cropley A. J.Dehn D., ed. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1996:41-56.
11. The international handbook of giftedness and talent. Heller K. A.Monks F. J.Subotnik R.Sternberg R. J., ed. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2000:.
12. Jarvin L.,Sternberg R. J.Educational psychology: A century of contributions. Zimmerman B. J.Schunk D. H., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003:.
13. Linacre J. M.Chicago, IL: Winsteps; 2009:.
14. Mandelman S. D.,Tan M.,Aljughaiman A. M.,Grigorenko E. L.Intellectual giftedness: Economic, political, cultural, and psychological considerations.Learning and Individual Differences. 2010;20:287-297.
15. Critical issues and practices in gifted education. Plucker J. A.Callahan C. M., ed. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press; 2008:.
16. Sternberg R. J.Abilities are forms of developing expertise.Educational Researcher. 1998;27 (3): 11-20.
17. Sternberg R. J.The theory of successful intelligence.Review of General Psychology. 1999;3:292-316.
18. Sternberg R. J.The Rainbow and Kaleidoscope Projects: A new psychological approach to undergraduate admissions.European Psychologist. 2009;14:279-287.
19. Sternberg R. J.Assessment of gifted students for identification purposes: New techniques for a new millennium.Learning and Individual Differences. 2010;20:327-336.
20. Handbook of intelligence. Sternberg R. J., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
21. Conceptions of Giftedness. Sternberg R. J.Davidson J. E., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
22. Sternberg R. J.,Jarvin L.,Grigorenko E. L.Explorations of giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2011:.
23. Sternberg R. J.The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills.Intelligence. 2006;34:321-350.
24. Subotnik R.,Arnold K. D.Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1994:.
25. Subotnik R.,Rickoff R.Should eminence based on outstanding innovation be the goal of gifted education and talent development? Implications for policy and research.Learning and Individual Differences. 2010;20:358-364.
26. Tan M.,Aljughaiman A. M.,Elliott J. G.,Kornilov S. A.,Ferrando-Prieto M.,Bolden D. S.,. . Grigorenko E. L.Multicutural psychoeducational assessment. Grigorenko E. L., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009:443-468.
27. Thompson B.Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness. Thompson B.Subotnik R., ed. Washington, DC: APA; 2010:33-52.