Internet portal use in an academic multiple sclerosis center

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 128-133

  Scott Nielsen, A ^a   Halamka, John D ^b   Philip Kinkel, R ^a  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM DISEASE; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; COMPUTERIZED PROVIDER ORDER ENTRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; FEMALE; HAND DISEASE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREDICTION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84856803646     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000177     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Rieckmann P, et al. New perspectives in the natural history of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010;74:2004-15.
2. Whetten-Goldstein K, Sloan F, Goldstein L, et al. A comprehensive assessment of the cost of multiple sclerosis in the United States. Mult Scler 1998;4:419-25.
3. Hay M, Strathmann C, Lieber E, et al. Why patients go online: multiple sclerosis, the internet, and physicianepatient communication. Neurologist 2008;14:374-81.
4. Wardell L, Hum S, Laizner AM, et al. Multiple sclerosis patients' interest in and likelihood of using online health-care services. International Journal of MS Care 2009;11:79.
5. Pucci E. Is the internet transforming the physicianeconsumer relationship? Preliminary data in a neurological setting. Eur J Neurol 2003;10:187-92.
6. Atreja A, Mehta N, Miller D, et al. One size does not fit all: Using qualitative methods to inform the development of an internet portal for multiple sclerosis patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:16-20.
7. Amatayakul M. Is a patient portal on your IT list? Healthc Financ Manage 2009;63:84,86.
8. Accessible Technology Can Help People with Multiple Sclerosis, but Too Few Use It. Microsoft, 2007. http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2007/oct07/10-26ms.mspx (accessed 26 Oct).
9. Staying Connected: An Investigative Survey of How Technology Affects People Living with MS. NMSS, Bayer Drugs, Microsoft, 2006. http://www.mymsmyway.com/healthcare_professionals/docs/survey_executive_summary.pdf.
10. Halamka J, Mandl K, Tang P. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:1-7.
11. Google Health. http://www.google.com/intl/en-US/health/about/, 2011.
12. Microsoft HealthVault. http://www.healthvault.com/personal/index.aspx, 2011.
13. PatientSite Demo. https://www.patientsite.org/psframe.asp?pg=myhealth.asp, 2011.
14. Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, et al. Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:91-5.
15. Morrissey S, Miller D, Kendall B, et al. The significance of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. A 5-year follow-up study. Brain 1993;116:135-46.
16. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the 'McDonald criteria'. Ann Neurol 2005;58:840-6.
17. 9-Hole Peg Test. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. http://www1.nationalmssociety.org/for-professionals/researchers/clinical-study-measures/9-hpt/index.aspx.
18. Rosser D, Laidlaw D, Murdoch I. The development of a 'reduced logMAR' visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:432-6.
19. Kurtzke J. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444-52.
20. Fernandez-Luque L, Elahi N, Grajales FJ III. An analysis of personal medical information disclosed in YouTube videos created by patients with multiple sclerosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:296.
21. de Sèze M, Ruffion A, Denys P, et al. The neurogenic bladder in multiple sclerosis: review of the literature and proposal of management guidelines. Mult Scler 2007;13:915-28.
22. Weinshenker B. Natural history of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1994;36 (Suppl):6-11.
23. Romney's Mission: Massachusetts Health Care. NPR, 2006. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5330854 (accessed 8 Apr 2006).
24. Van Hoecke S, Steurbaut K, Taveirne K, et al. Design and implementation of a secure and user-friendly broker platform supporting the end-to-end provisioning of e-homecare services. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16:42-7.
25. Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J, et al. Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e19.
26. Miller D, Moore S, Fox R, et al. Web-based self-management for patients with multiple sclerosis: A practical, randomized trial. Telemed J E Health 2011;17:5-13.
27. Biogen, Elan Launch My MS Health, A Web-Based PRO Research Program. TheMedical News, 2010. http://www.news-medical.net/news/20100609/Biogen-Elan-launch-My-MS-Health-a-web-based-PRO-research-program.aspx (accessed 9 Jun 2010).
28. My MS Health: A Web Based Research Program, 2010. http://www.mymshealth.org (accessed 2011).
29. Lowe-Strong A, McCullagh PJ. Monitoring of symptoms and interventions associated with multiple sclerosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005;117:223-8.