Monitoring of symptoms and interventions associated with multiple sclerosis

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 117, Issue , 2005, Pages 223-228

  Lowe Strong, Andrea ^a   McCullagh, Paul J ^b  

^a Faculty of Life and Health Sciences   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

healthcare; monitoring; Multiple sclerosis; personalization; symptoms

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; HEALTH CARE; IMAGE CODING; MONITORING; TEXTILES; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PERSONALIZATIONS; PROTOTYPE INTERFACE; SYMPTOMS; TEXTUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TELEMEDICINE;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33645739086     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Wilson P. Mapping the potential of eHealth: Empowering the citizen through eHealth tools and services. eHealth Conference, Cork, 5-6 May 2004. European Institute of Public Administration
2. Accu-Chek,http://www. accu-chek. com/products/data-compass. jsp
3. Lisak D. Overview of symptomatic management of multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs 2001; 33(5): 224-30
4. Jonsson A, Ravnborg MH. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Crit Rev Phys Rehab Medicine 1998; 10(1): 75-100
5. Barcellos LF, Thomson G. Genetic Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis in Europeans. J Neuroimmunol 2003; 143 (1-2): 1-6
6. Amor S, Layward L, Van Noort JM. Multiple Sclerosis: Modeling The Future. The Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Conference: Frontiers in Science and Patient Care Disease Management. Mol Med Today 1998; 4(8): 328-30
7. KoKo C. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehab 1999; 13(1): 33-41
8. Smith KJ, McDonald WI. The pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis: the mechanisms underlying the production of symptoms and the natural history of the disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999; 354: 1649-73
9. Jonsson A, Ravnborg MH. Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 1998; 10(1): 75-100
10. Whitney DK. Early diagnosis and intervention in multiple sclerosis. Int J MS care 2001; 3(3): 1-9
11. Rao SM, Huber SJ, Bornstein RA. Emotional changes with Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson's disease. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60:369-78
12. Brassat D, Clanet M. Treatment of symptoms and relapses of multiple sclerosis. Rev Prat (French). 1999; 49 (17): 187-71
13. Miltenburger C, Kobelt G. Quality of life and cost of multiple sclerosis. Clinical Neurol Neurosurg 2002; 104: 27-25
14. Leary SM, Thompson AJ Current management of multiple sclerosis. Int J Clin Pract 2000; 54(3): 16-19
15. Bever, CT. Multiple Sclerosis: symptomatic treatment. Current Treat Options Neurol 1999; 1:221-37
16. Thompson AJ. Symptomatic management and rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2001; 71 (2): 22-27
17. Morris ME, Cantwell C, Vowels L, Dodd K. Changes in gait and fatigue from morning to afternoon in people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2002; 72: 361-5
18. McDonnell GV, Hawkins SA. Multiple Sclerosis in Northern Ireland: a historical and global perspective. Ulster Med J 2000; 69(2): 97-105
19. McDonnell GV, Hawkins SA (1998). An epidemiologic study of multiple sclerosis in Northern Ireland. Neurol 1998; 50: 423-28
20. MS Society, Northern Ireland http://www. mssocietyni. co. uk Accessed 8th March 2005
21. Davis WM. Multiple Sclerosis: Continuing Mysteries and Current Management. Drug Topics 2000; 144 (12): 93-102
22. Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM. Drug Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Brit Med J 2000; 321 (7259): 490-494
23. Groom MJ, Lincoln NB, Francis VM, Stephan TF. Assessing mood in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17(8): 847-857
24. van Ginneken AM, Moorman, PW and Brecht AA. The patient record. In: van Bemmel, JH, Musen, MA, eds, Handbook of Medical Informatics, Springer, 1997; pp. 99-115
25. Reports From the 2000 Annual Meetings of Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis and the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. The current state of MS Databases, International Journal of MS Care (Supplement), 2000: 2(3). http://www. mscare. com
26. Vollmer TL, Ni W, Stanton S, Hadjimichael O. The NARCOMS patient registry: A resource for investigators. International Journal of MS Care 1999: 1: pp. 12-15. http://www. mscare. com
27. McCullagh PJ, McGuigan J, Fegan M, Lowe-Strong A. Structured Data Entry using Graphical Input: Recording Symptoms for Multiple Sclerosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 95: 673-678, eds R Baud et al, 2003
28. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1: 1975: pp. 277-99