A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 973-981

  Van Der Waaij, E H ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Environmental Sensitivity; Metabolic Stress; Resource Allocation; Selection; Stochastic Simulation

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 2342647458     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ansci/82.4.973     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baker, R. L., J. M. Mugambi, J. O. Audho, A. B. Carles, and W. Thorpe. 2002. Comparison of Red Maasai and Dorper sheep for resistance to gastro-intestinal nematode parasites, productivity and efficiency in a humid and semi-arid environment in Kenya. Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France, Communication No. 13-10.
2. Beilharz, R. G., B. G. Luxford, and J. L. Wilkinson. 1993. Quantitative genetics and evolution: Is our understanding of genetics sufficient to explain evolution? J. Anim. Br. Gen. 110:161-170.
3. Bünger L., U. Renne, G. Dietl, and S. Kuhla. 1998. Long-term selection for protein amount over 70 generations in mice. Genet. Res. 72:93-109.
4. Butler, W. R. 2003. Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 83:211-218.
5. Cameron, N. D., M. Enser, G. R. Nute, F. M. Whittington, J. C. Penman, A. C. Fisken, A. M. Perry, and J. D. Wood. 2000. Genotype with nutrition interaction on fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat and the relationship with flavor of pig meat. Meat Sci. 55:187-195.
6. Cameron, N. D., G. B. Garth, J. C. Penman, and A. Fiskin. 2003. Sensitivity to dietary lysine: energy content in pigs divergently selected for components of efficient lean growth rate. Anim. Sci. 76:175-190.
7. Collard, B. L., P. J. Boettcher, J. C. M. Dekkers, D. Petitclerc, and L. R. Schaeffer. 2000. Relationships between energy balance and health traits of dairy cattle in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2683-2690.
8. De Greef, K. H., L. L. G. Janss, A. L. J. Vereijken, R. Pit, and C. L. M. Gerritsen. 2001. Disease induced variability of genetic correlations: ascites in broilers as a case study. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1723-1733.
9. De Jong, G., and A. J. Van Noordwijk. 1992. Acquisition and allocation of resources: Genetic (co)variances, selection, and life histories. Am. Nat. 139:749-770.
10. Emanuelson, U., G. Banos, and J. Philipsson. 1999. Interbull Centre Report. Pages 1-6 in Interbull Bulletin 22. Proc. of the 1999 Interbull Mtg., Zürich, Switzerland.
11. Knap, P. W., and S. C. Bishop. 2000. Relations between genetic change and infectious disease in domestic livestock. Pages 65-80 in Occas. Pub. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. No. 27. BSAS, Edinburgh, Scotland.
12. Kolmodin, R., E. Strandberg, H. Jorjani, and B. Danell. 2003. Selection in presence of genotype by environment interaction: Response in environmental sensitivity. Anim. Sci. 76:375-386.
13. Kolmodin, R., E. Strandberg, E. Madsen, J. Jensen, and H. Jorjani. 2002. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms. Acta Agric. Scand. 52:11-24.
14. López-Gatius, F. 2003. Is fertility declining in dairy cattle? A retrospective study in north-eastern Spain. Theriogenology 60:89-99.
15. Luiting, P., and E. M. Urff. 1991. Optimization of a model to estimate residual feed consumption in the laying hen. Livest. Prod. Sci., 27:321-338.
16. Marks, H. L. 1996. Long-term selection for body weight in Japanese quail under different environments. Poult. Sci. 75:1198-1203.
17. Nestor, K. E., D. O. Noble, N. J. Zhu, and Y. Moritsu. 1996. Direct and correlated responses to long-term selection for increased body weight and egg production in turkeys. Poult. Sci. 75:1180-1191.
18. Pakdel, A., J. A. M. Van Arendonk, A. L. J. Vereijken, and H. Bovenhuis 2002. Genetic and phenotypic correlations for ascites related traits in broilers. Communication No. 13-16. Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France.
19. Parmentier, H. K., M. G. B. Nieuwland, E. Rijke, G. De Vries Reilingh, and J. W. Schrama. 1996. Divergent antibody responses to vaccines and divergent body weight of chicken lines selected for high and low humoral responsiveness to sheep red blood cells. Avian Dis. 40:634-644.
20. Pryce, J. E., M. P. Coffey, and S. Brotherstone. 2000. The genetic relationship between calving interval, body condition score and linear type and management traits in registered Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2664-2671.
21. Pryce, J. E., M. P. Coffey, S. H. Brotherstone, and J. A. Wooliams. 2002. Genetic relationships between calving interval and body condition score conditional on milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1590-1595.
22. Pryce, J. E., M. P. Coffey, and G. Simm. 2001. The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1508-1515.
23. Rauw, W. M., E. Kanis, E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen, and F. J. Grommers. 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56:15-33.
24. Ravagnolo, O., and I. Misztal. 2002. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, parameter estimation. J. Dairy Sci., 83:2126-2130.
25. Royal, M. D., J. E. Pryce, J. A. Woolliams, and A. P. F. Flint. 2002. The genetic relationship between commencement of luteal activity and calving interval, body condition score, production, and linear type traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3071-3080.
26. Thorpe, B. H., and E. Luiting. 2000. Breeding for resistance to production diseases in poultry. Pages 357-377 in Breeding for Disease Resistance in Farm Animals. 2nd ed. R. F. E. Axford, S. C. Bishop, F. W. Nicholas, and J. B. Owen, ed. CAB Int., Oxon, U.K.
27. Van der Waaij, E. H., P. Bijma, S. C. Bishop, and J. A. M. Van Arendonk. 2000. Modeling selection for production traits under selection under constant infection pressure. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2809-2820.
28. Van der Waaij, E. H., L. L. G. Janss, and P. Bijma. 2002. A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress. Communication No. 23-11. Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France.
29. Veerkamp, R. F. 2002. Feed intake and energy balance in lactating animals. Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France, Communication No. 10-01.
30. Wray, N. R., and R. Thompson. 1990. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genet. Res. Camb. 55:41-54.
31. Yalçin, S., S. Özkan, T. Türknut, and P. B. Siegel. 2001. Responses to heat stress in commercial and local broiler stocks. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:149-152.