Ground Reaction Force Calcaneal Offset: A new measurement of hindfoot alignment

Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 9-14

  Lintz, Francois ^a   Barton, Tristan ^a   Millet, Mark ^a   Harries, William J ^a   Hepple, Stephen ^a   Winson, Ian G ^a  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ankle biomechanics; Calcaneal offset; Computer assisted surgery; Ground reaction force; Hindfoot alignment; Surgical planning

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CALCANEUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT SURGERY; FOREFOOT; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIBIA;

BIOMECHANICS; CALCANEUS; FEMALE; FOREFOOT, HUMAN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84856717208     PISSN: 12687731     EISSN: 14609584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Maniar R.N., Johorey A.C., Pujary C.T., Yadava A.N. Margin of error in alignment: a study undertaken when converting from conventional to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010, 26(1):82-87.
2. Kitaoka H.B., Crevoisier X.M., Hansen D., Katajarvi B., Harbst K., Kaufman K.R. Foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces during ambulation. Foot Ankle Int 2006, 27:808-813.
3. Fukuda T., Haddad S.L., Ren Y., Zhang L.Q. Impact of talar component rotation on contact pressure after total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int 2010, 31:404-411.
4. Child B.J., Hix J., Catanzariti A.R., Mendicino R.W., Saltrick K. The effect of hindfoot realignment in triple arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009, 48:285-293.
5. Desai S.S., Shetty G.M., Song H.R., Lee S.H., Kim T.Y., Hur C.Y. Effect of foot deformity on conventional mechanical axis deviation and ground mechanical axis deviation during single leg stance and two leg stance in genu varum. Knee 2007, 14:452-457.
6. McCaw S.T., DeVita P. Errors in alignment of center of pressure and foot coordinates affect predicted lower extremity torques. J Biomech 1995, 28:985-988.
7. Guichet J.M., Javed A., Russell J., Saleh M. Effect of the foot on the mechanical alignment of the lower limbs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 415:193-201.
8. Tuijthof G.J., Herder J.L., Scholten P.E., van Dijk C.N., Pistecky P.V. Measuring alignment of the hindfoot. J Biomech Eng 2004, 126:357-362.
9. Strash W.W., Berardo P. Radiographic assessment of the hindfoot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2004, 21:295-304.
10. Perry M.D., Mont M.A., Einhorn T.A., Waller J.D. The validity of measurements made on standard foot orthoroentgenograms. Foot Ankle 1992, 13:502-507.
11. Haight H.J., Dahm D.L., Smith J., Krause D.A. Measuring standing hindfoot alignment: reliability of goniometric and visual measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:571-575.
12. Perez H.R., Reber L.K., Christensen J.C. The effect of frontal plane position on first ray motion: forefoot locking mechanism. Foot Ankle Int 2008, 29:72-76.
13. Johnson J.E., Lamdan R., Granberry W.F., Harris G.F., Carrera G.F. Hindfoot coronal alignment: a modified radiographic method. Foot Ankle Int 1999, 20:818-825.
14. Mendicino R.W., Catanzariti A.R., John S., Child B., Lamm B.M. Long leg calcaneal axial and hindfoot alignment radiographic views for frontal plane assessment. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2008, 98:75-78.
15. Reilingh M.L., Beimers L., Tuijthof G.J., Stufkens S.A., Maas M., van Dijk C.N. Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view. Skeletal Radiol 2009, 39(11):1103-1108.
16. Saltzman C.L., el-Khoury G.Y. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int 1995, 16:572-576.
17. Wu W.L., Su F.C., Cheng Y.M., Huang P.J., Chou Y.L., Chou C.K. Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis. Gait Posture 2000, 11:54-61.
18. Canseco K., Long J., Marks R., Khazzam M., Harris G. Quantitative characterization of gait kinematics in patients with hallux rigidus using the Milwaukee foot model. J Orthop Res 2008, 26:419-427.
19. Goutallier D., Leche P. Study of the frontal ground position of the back of the foot by retrotibial incident radiography with controlled rotation. Comparison with data from the Meary-type image. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1984, 70(Suppl 2):92-96.
20. Meary R., Filipe G., Aubriot J.H., Tomeno B. Functional study of a double arthrodesis of the foot. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1977, 63:345-359.
21. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
22. Kapandji I.A. The physiology of the joints 1985, Churchill Livingstone.
23. Rugg S.G., Gregor R.J., Mandelbaum B.R., Chiu L. In vivo moment arm calculations at the ankle using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Biomech 1990, 23:495-501.
24. Werner F.W., Ayers D.C., Maletsky L.P., Rullkoetter P.J. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005, 38:349-355.
25. Khan F.A., Koff M.F., Noiseux N.O., Bernhardt K.A., O'Byrne M.M., Larson D.R., et al. Effect of local alignment on compartmental patterns of knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:1961-1969.
26. Fuchs S., Sandmann C., Skwara A., Chylarecki C. Quality of life 20 years after arthrodesis of the ankle. A study of adjacent joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:994-998.
27. Liau J.J., Cheng C.K., Huang C.H., Lo W.H. The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses-a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17:140-146.
28. Atkins G.J., Welldon K.J., Holding C.A., Haynes D.R., Howie D.W., Findlay D.M. The induction of a catabolic phenotype in human primary osteoblasts and osteocytes by polyethylene particles. Biomaterials 2009, 30:3672-3681.
29. Wood P.L., Prem H., Sutton C. Total ankle replacement: medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:605-609.
30. Adams S.B., Spritzer C.E., Hofstaetter S.G., Jakoi A.M., Pietrobon R., Nunley J.A., et al. Computer-assisted tibia preparation for total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Int J Med Robot 2007, 3:336-340.
31. Richter M. Computer-assisted surgery-(CAS-)guided correction arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2009, 21:313-322.
32. Richter M., Zech S. Computer assisted surgery (CAS) guided arthrodesis of the foot and ankle: an analysis of accuracy in 100 cases. Foot Ankle Int 2008, 29:1235-1242.
33. Richter M., Zech S. 3D imaging (ARCADIS)-based computer assisted surgery (CAS) guided retrograde drilling in osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 2008, 29:1243-1248.
34. Richter M., Zech S., Bay R. 3D imaging (ARCADIS)-based computer assisted surgery (CAS) for nail placement in combined ankle and subtalar fusion. Foot Ankle Int 2008, 29:1249-1252.
35. Richter M., Zech S., Bay R. 3D-imaging (ARCADIS) based computer assisted surgery (CAS) guided drilling for screw placement in subtalar fusion. Foot Ankle Int 2009, 30:163-166.
36. Trnka H.J., Easley M.E., Lam P.W., Anderson C.D., Schon L.C., Myerson M.S. Subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:849-854.
37. Madezo P., de Cussac J.B., Gouin F., Bainvel J.V., Passuti N. Combined tibio-talar and subtalar arthrodesis by retrograde nail in hindfoot rheumatoid arthritis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1998, 84:646-652.