Erratum: Computer assisted tibia preparation for total ankle arthroplasty: A cadaveric study(The International Journal of Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery(2007), 3, (336-340), DOI: 10.1002/rcs.163);Computer-assisted tibia preparation for total ankle arthroplasty: A cadaveric study

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 336-340

  Adams, Samuel B ^a   Spritzer, Charles E ^a   Hofstaetter, Stefan G ^a   Jakoi, Andre M ^a   Pietrobon, Ricardo ^a   Nunley II, James A ^a   Easley, Mark E ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ankle replacement; Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery; Computer assisted surgery; Total ankle arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; NAVIGATION; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; ORTHOPEDICS;

ANKLE REPLACEMENT; ARTHROPLASTIES; COMPUTER ASSISTED; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER NAVIGATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY; CORONAL PLANES; SAGITTAL PLANE; TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY;

ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; TIBIA; TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; ANKLE; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANKLE JOINT; ARTHROPLASTY; CADAVER; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 38949204486     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.191     Document Type: Erratum

References (11)

1. Lord G, Marotte JH. [Total ankle prosthesis. Technique and first results, apropos of 12 cases.] Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1973; 59: 139-151 [in French].
2. Wapner KL. Salvage of failed and infected total ankle replacements with fusion. Instr Course Lect 2002; 51: 153-157.
3. Stamatis ED, Myerson MS. How to avoid specific complications of total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 2002; 7: 765-789.
4. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses: three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 85: 1321-1329.
5. Kotnis R, Pasapula C, Anwar F, et al. The management of failed ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88B(8): 1039-1047.
6. Valderrabano V, Hinterman B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7 year average follow-up of 65 patients. Clin Orthop 2004; 424: 47-56.
7. Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1410-1420.
8. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(5): 682-687.
9. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(7): suppl 3): 132-138.
10. Kim SJ, MacDonalt M, Hernandez J, et al. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(7): suppl 3): 123-131.
11. Stockle B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 426: 180-186.