Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: The CE-MARC study

Trials

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Greenwood, John P ^a   Maredia, Neil ^a   Radjenovic, Aleksandra ^b   Brown, Julia M ^b   Nixon, Jane ^b   Farrin, Amanda J ^b   Dickinson, Catherine ^c   Younger, John F ^a   Ridgway, John P ^d   Sculpher, Mark ^e   Ball, Stephen G ^a   Plein, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^d LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EXERCISE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROGNOSIS; RADIOCARDIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 68949201648     PISSN: 17456215     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-62     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allender S Peto V Scarborough P Boxer A Rayner M Coronary heart disease statistics British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group and Department of Public Health, University of Oxford 2007
2. Gianrossi R Detrano R Mulvihill D Lehmann K Dubach P Colombo A McArthur D Froelicher V Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis Circulation 1989, 80:87-98 2661056
3. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2003
4. Noto TJ Jr Johnson LW Krone R Weaver WF Clark DA Kramer JR Jr Vetrovec GW Cardiac catheterization 1990: A report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I) Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991, 24:75-83 10.1002/ccd.1810240202 1742788
5. Berrington de Gonzalez A Darby S Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries Lancet 2004, 363:345-351 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0 15070562
6. Razavi R Hill DL Keevil SF Miquel ME Muthurangu V Hegde S Rhode K Barnett M van Vaals J Hawkes DJ Baker E Cardiac catheterisation guided by MRI in children and adults with congenital heart disease Lancet 2003, 362:1877-1882 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14956-2 14667742
7. BCIS Audit Returns 2006. Adult Interventional Procedures http://www.bcis.org.uk/resources/audit/audit_2006
8. Rates of survival after heart surgery in the UK http://heartsurgery.healthcarecommission.org.uk/Survival.aspx
9. Fieno DS Kim RJ Chen EL Lomasney JW Klocke FJ Judd RM Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: Distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 36:1985-1991 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00958-X 11092675
10. Rogers WJ Jr Kramer CM Geskin G Hu YL Theobald TM Vido DA Petruolo S Reichek N Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction Circulation 1999, 99:744-750 9989958
11. Kim RJ Wu E Rafael A Chen EL Parker MA Simonetti O Klocke FJ Bonow RO Judd RM The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction N Engl J Med 2000, 343:1445-1453 10.1056/NEJM200011163432003 11078769
12. Hundley WG Hamilton CA Clarke GD Hillis LD Herrington DM Lange RA Applegate RJ Thomas MS Payne J Link KM Peshock RM Visualization and functional assessment of proximal and middle left anterior descending coronary stenoses in humans with magnetic resonance imaging Circulation 1999, 99:3248-3254 10385498
13. Botnar RM Stuber M Danias PG Kissinger KV Manning WJ Improved coronary artery definition with T2-weighted, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary MRA Circulation 1999, 99:3139-3148 10377077
14. Passariello R De Santis M Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of myocardial perfusion Am J Cardiol 1998, 81:68G-73G 10.1016/ S0002-9149(98)00057-5 9662231
15. Plein S Ridgway JP Jones TR Bloomer TN Sivananthan MU Coronary artery disease: Assessment with a comprehensive MR imaging protocol - initial results Radiology 2002, 225:300-307 10.1148/radiol.2243011436 12355020
16. Plein S Greenwood JP Ridgway JP Cranny G Ball SG Sivananthan MU Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:2173-2181 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.056 15582315
17. Klem I Heitner JF Shah DJ Sketch MH Jr Behar V Weinsaft J Cawley P Parker M Elliott M Judd RM Kim RJ Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1630-1638 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.074 16631001
18. Schwitter J Wacker CM van Rossum AC Lombardi M Al-Saadi N Ahlstrom H Dill T Larsson HB Flamm SD Marquardt M Johansson L MR-IMPACT: Comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial Eur Heart J 2008, 29:480-489 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617 18208849
19. Messroghli DR Bainbridge GJ Alfakih K Jones TR Plein S Ridgway JP Sivananthan MU Assessment of regional left ventricular function: accuracy and reproducibility of positioning standard short-axis sections in cardiac MR imaging Radiology 2005, 235:229-236 10.1148/ radiol.2351040249 15731374
20. Look DC Locker DR Time saving in measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times Rev Sci Instrum 1970, 41:250-251 10.1063/1.1684482
21. Gibbons RJ Balady GJ Bricker JT Chaitman BR Fletcher GF Froelicher VF Mark DB McCallister BD Mooss AN O'Reilly MG et al ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: Summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines) J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40:1531-1540 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02164-2 12392846
22. Obuchowski NA Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy Stat Methods Med Res 1998, 7:371-392 10.1191/096228098678080061 9871953
23. Harrell FE Jr Lee KL Mark DB Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors Stat Med 1996, 15:361-387 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4 8668867
24. Putter H Fiocco M Geskus RB Tutorial in biostatistics: Competing risks and multi-state models Stat Med 2007, 26:2389-2430 10.1002/sim.2712 17031868
25. Briggs A Claxton K Sculpher M Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006
26. Briggs A Mihaylova B Sculpher M Hall A Wolstenholme J Simoons M Deckers J Ferrari R Remme WJ Bertrand M Fox K Cost effectiveness of perindopril in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease using data from the EUROPA study Heart 2007, 93:1081-1086 10.1136/hrt.2005.086728 17135223
27. Henriksson M Epstein DM Palmer SJ Sculpher MJ Clayton TC Pocock SJ Henderson RA Buxton MJ Fox KA The cost-effectiveness of an early interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome based on the RITA 3 trial Heart 2008, 94:717-723 10.1136/hrt.2007.127340 18032459
28. Bravo Vergel Y Palmer S Asseburg C Fenwick E de Belder M Abrams K Sculpher M Is primary angioplasty cost effective in the UK? Results of a comprehensive decision analysis Heart 2007, 93:1238-1243 10.1136/ hrt.2006.111401 17717037
29. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2008