Diagnostic performance of a near-infrared breast imaging system as adjunct to mammography versus X-ray mammography alone

European Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 350-357

  Collettini, F ^a   Martin, J C ^a   Diekmann, F ^a   Fallenberg, E ^a   Engelken, F ^a   Ponder, S ^b   Kroencke, T J ^a   Hamm, B ^a   Poellinger, A ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Imaging Diagnostic Systems Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Lasers; Mammography; Optical tomography; ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEAR INFRARED BREAST IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LASERS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED; X-RAYS;

EID: 84856618278     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2276-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. A Jemal R Siegel E Ward, et al. 2008 Cancer statistics, 2008 CA Canc J Clin 58 71 96 10.3322/CA.2007.0010 (Pubitemid 351521864)
2. M Kalager M Zelen F Langmark HO Adami 2010 Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway N Engl J Med 363 1203 1210 20860502 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht1SjurrJ
3. L Tabar SW Duffy MF Yen, et al. 2002 All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: support for breast cancer mortality as an end point J Med Screen 9 159 162 12518005 10.1136/jms.9.4.159 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FktlCnsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36135341)
4. SJ Otto J Fracheboud CW Looman, et al. 2003 Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review Lancet 361 1411 1417 12727393 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13132-7 (Pubitemid 36515040)
5. ED Pisano C Gatsonis E Hendrick, et al. 2005 Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 1773 1783 16169887 10.1056/NEJMoa052911 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFKrtLnN (Pubitemid 41549889)
6. ED Pisano RE Hendrick MJ Yaffe, et al. 2008 Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST Radiology 246 376 383 18227537 10.1148/radiol.2461070200
7. CK Kuhl S Schrading CC Leutner, et al. 2005 Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer J Clin Oncol 23 8469 8476 16293877 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.4960
8. J Hoey 2002 Mammography screening among women aged 40-49 years shows no benefit CMAJ 167 898 12406951 (Pubitemid 35333676)
9. (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151: 716-726
10. H Fredholm S Eaker J Frisell L Holmberg I Fredriksson H Lindman 2009 Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment PLoS One 4 e7695 19907646 10.1371/journal.pone.0007695
11. K Flobbe AM Bosch AG Kessels, et al. 2003 The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer Arch Intern Med 163 1194 1199 12767956 10.1001/archinte.163.10.1194 (Pubitemid 36613072)
12. I Bedrosian R Mick SG Orel, et al. 2003 Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging Cancer 98 468 473 12879462 10.1002/cncr.11490 (Pubitemid 36885985)
13. ML Brown F Houn EA Sickles LG Kessler 1995 Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 1373 1377 7484568 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fnt1Krsg%3D%3D
14. SP Poplack AN Tosteson MR Grove WA Wells PA Carney 2000 Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network Radiology 217 832 840 11110951 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FotVOmtw%3D%3D
15. R Weissleder MJ Pittet 2008 Imaging in the era of molecular oncology Nature 452 580 589 18385732 10.1038/nature06917 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXktFCgt7Y%3D (Pubitemid 351483372)
16. BJ Tromberg N Shah R Lanning, et al. 2000 Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy Neoplasia 2 26 40 10933066 10.1038/sj.neo.7900082 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhvFKqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30123178)
17. D Floery TH Helbich CC Riedl, et al. 2005 Characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography laser mammography (CTLM): initial experience Invest Radiol 40 328 335 15905718 10.1097/01.rli.0000164487. 60548.28 (Pubitemid 40734560)
18. H Rinneberg D Grosenick KT Moesta, et al. 2005 Scanning time-domain optical mammography: detection and characterization of breast tumors in vivo Tech Canc Res Treat 4 483 496 (Pubitemid 41446802)
19. A Cerussi D Hsiang N Shah, et al. 2007 Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 4014 4019 17360469 10.1073/pnas.0611058104 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjt1yqtLg%3D (Pubitemid 47181570)
20. A Poellinger JC Martin SL Ponder, et al. 2008 Near-infrared laser computed tomography of the breast first clinical experience Acad Radiol 15 1545 1553 19000871 10.1016/j.acra.2008.07.023
21. DD Dorfman KS Berbaum CE Metz 1992 Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method Invest Radiol 27 723 731 1399456 10.1097/00004424- 199209000-00015 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FhsVOksg%3D%3D
22. DD Dorfman KS Berbaum RV Lenth YF Chen BA Donaghy 1998 Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design Acad Radiol 5 591 602 9750888 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80294-8 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvitlClsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28405446)
23. SL Hillis KS Berbaum 2005 Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification Acad Radiol 12 1534 1541 16321742 10.1016/j.acra.2005.07. 012 (Pubitemid 41729034)
24. SL Hillis KS Berbaum 2004 Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method Acad Radiol 11 1260 1273 15561573 10.1016/j.acra.2004.08.009
25. SL Hillis KS Berbaum CE Metz 2008 Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis Acad Radiol 15 647 661 18423323 10.1016/j.acra.2007.12.015 (Pubitemid 351515893)
26. SL Hillis 2007 A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis Stat Med 26 596 619 16538699 10.1002/sim.2532 (Pubitemid 46139541)
27. A Cerussi N Shah D Hsiang A Durkin J Butler BJ Tromberg 2006 In vivo absorption, scattering, and physiologic properties of 58 malignant breast tumors determined by broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy J Biomed Opt 11 044005 16965162 10.1117/1.2337546 (Pubitemid 44803754)
28. Q Zhu PU Hegde A Ricci Jr, et al. 2010 Early-stage invasive breast cancers: potential role of optical tomography with US localization in assisting diagnosis Radiology 256 367 378 20571122 10.1148/radiol.10091237
29. Q Fang J Selb SA Carp, et al. 2011 Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging Radiology 258 89 97 21062924 10.1148/radiol. 10082176
30. WA Wells CP Daghlian TD Tosteson, et al. 2004 Analysis of the microvasculature and tissue type ratios in normal vs. benign and malignant breast tissue Anal Quant Cytol Histol 26 166 174 15218693 (Pubitemid 38737818)
31. SS You YX Jiang QL Zhu, et al. 2010 US-guided diffused optical tomography: a promising functional imaging technique in breast lesions Eur Radiol 20 309 317 19707770 10.1007/s00330-009-1551-y
32. A Corlu R Choe T Durduran, et al. 2007 Three-dimensional in vivo fluorescence diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer in humans Opt Express 15 6696 6716 19546980 10.1364/OE.15.006696 (Pubitemid 46827669)
33. B Alacam B Yazici X Intes S Nioka B Chance 2008 Pharmacokinetic-rate images of indocyanine green for breast tumors using near-infrared optical methods Phys Med Biol 53 837 859 18263944 10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/002 (Pubitemid 351238109)
34. A Poellinger S Burock D Grosenick, et al. 2011 Breast cancer: early- and late-fluorescence near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green-a preliminary study Radiology 258 409 416 21177396 10.1148/radiol.10100258
35. SM van de Ven SG Elias AJ Wiethoff, et al. 2009 Diffuse optical tomography of the breast: preliminary findings of a new prototype and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging Eur Radiol 19 1108 1113 19137304 10.1007/s00330-008-1268-3
36. S van de Ven S Elias A Wiethoff, et al. 2009 Diffuse optical tomography of the breast: initial validation in benign cysts Mol Imag Biol 11 64 70 10.1007/s11307-008-0176-x