Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete information

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 174, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1842-1864

  Mateos, A ^a   Jimenez A ^a   Rios Insua S ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Additive multi attribute utility model; Decision analysis; Decision support system; Group decisions and negotiations; Multiple criteria analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; FUNCTIONS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ADDITIVE MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY MODEL; GROUP DECISIONS AND NEGOTIATIONS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION TECHNIQUES; MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 33746859832     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barron F.H., and Barret B.E. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science 42 11 (1996) 1515-1523
2. Bratley P., Fox B.L., and Schrage E.L. A guide to simulation (1983), Springer-Verlag, New York
3. Bui T. Co-Op-A group decision support system for cooperative multiple criteria decision making. Lecture notes in computer science 290 (1987), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
4. Cao P.P., Burstein F., and San Pedro J. Extending coordination theory to the field of distributed group multiple criteria decision-making. Journal of Decision Systems 10 10 (2004) 1-20
5. Håkanson L., Gallego E., and Ríos-Insua S. The application of the lake ecosystem index in multi-attribute decision analysis in radioecology. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 49 3 (2000) 319-344
6. Harsanyi J.C. Cardinal welfare, individual ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility theory. Journal of Political Economy 63 (1955) 309-321
7. Hokkanen J., and Salminen P. The choice of a solid waste management system by using the ELECTRE III decision-aid method. In: Paruccini M. (Ed). Applying multiple criteria aid for decision to environmental management (1994), Kluwer, Dordrecht
8. ICRP, International Commission on Radiological Protection 1991. 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP, Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP, 20, No. 1.
9. Jiménez, A., 2002. Un Sistema de Ayuda a la Decisión Multiatributo con Asignaciones Imprecisas, Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Madrid.
10. Jiménez A., Ríos-Insua S., and Mateos A. A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments. Decision Support Systems 36 1 (2003) 65-79
11. Keeney R.L., and Kirkwood C.W. Group decision making using cardinal social welfare function. Management Science 22 (1975) 430-437
12. Kim S.H., and Ahn B.S. Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research 116 (1999) 498-507
13. Kim S.H., and Han C.H. Establishing dominance between alternatives with incomplete information in a hierarchical structured attribute tree. European Journal of Operational Research 122 (2000) 79-90
14. Kim S.H., Choi S.H., and Kim J.K. An interactive procedure for multiattribute group decision making with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research 118 (1999) 139-152
15. Korhonen P., Moskowitz H., Wallenius J., and Zionts S. An interactive approach to multiple criteria optimization with multiple decision-makers. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 33 (1986) 589-602
16. Lahdelma R., and Salminen P. SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research 49 3 (2001) 444-454
17. Mateos A., Jiménez A., and Ríos Insua S. A multiattribute solving dominance and potential optimality in imprecise multi-attribute additive problems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 79 (2003) 253-262
18. Mateos A., Jiménez A., and Ríos Insua S. Modelling individual and global comparisons for multi-attribute preferences. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making 12 (2003) 177-190
19. Ramanathan R., and Ganesh L.S. Group preferences aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages. European Journal of Operational Research 79 (1994) 249-265
20. Ríos Insua D. Ambiguity, imprecision and sensitivity in decision theory. In: Vilaplana J.P., and Puri M.L. (Eds). Recent advances in statistics and probability (1994), VSP 219-232
21. Ríos Insua D., Gallego E., Mateos A., and Ríos-Insua S. MOIRA: A decision support system for decision making on aquatic ecosystems contaminated by radioactive fallout. Annals of Operations Research 95 (2000) 341-364
22. Salo A.A. Interactive decision aiding for group decision support. European Journal of Operational Research 84 (1995) 134-149
23. Teich J.E., Wallenius H., and Wallenius J. Advances in negotiation science. Transactions on Operational Research 6 (1994) 55-94
24. Vik R. The lake Øvre Heimdalsvatn, a subalpine freshwater ecosystem. Holartic Ecology 1 (1978) 81-320
25. von Nitzsch R., and Weber M. Utility function assessment on a micro-computer: An interactive procedure. Annals of Operations Research 16 (1988) 149-160
26. Zionts S. A multiple criteria method for choosing among discrete alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research 7 (1981) 143-147
27. Zionts S., and Wallenius J. An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Science 22 (1976) 652-663