Teaching money computation skills to high school students with mild intellectual disabilities via the TouchMath© Program: A multi-sensory approach

Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 544-555

  Waters, Hugh E ^a   Boon, Richard T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856466359     PISSN: 21541647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
2. Browder, D. M., & Grasso, E. (1999). Teaching money skills to individuals with mental retardation: A research review with practical applications. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 297-308.
3. Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A., & Wakeman, S. Y. (2008). A metaanalysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 407-432.
4. Bullock, J., Pierce, S., & McClellan, L. (1989). Touch Math. Colorado Springs, Co: Innovative Learning Concepts.
5. Buder, F. M., Miller, S. P., Kit-hung, L., & Pierce, T. (2001). Teaching mathematics to students with mild-to-moderate mental retardation: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation, 39, 20-31. (Pubitemid 33596664)
6. Cihak, D., & Foust, J. (2008). Comparing number lines and touch points to teach addition facts to students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 131-137.
7. nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
8. Fletcher, D., Boon, R., & Cihak, D. (2010). Effects of the TouchMath program compared to a number line strategy to teach addition facts to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 449-458.
9. Harrison, P. L., & Oakland, T. (2003), Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
10. th Congress, Second Session.
11. Jitendra, A. K., & Xin, Y. (1997). Mathematical problem solving instrucdon for students with mild disabilities and students at risk for math failure: A research syndiesis. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 412-438. (Pubitemid 127171516)
12. Kramer, T., & Krug, D. A. (1973). A rationale and procedure for teaching addition. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 8, 140-145.
13. Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. (2003). Mauiematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114. (Pubitemid 36412580)
14. Mastropieri, M. A., Bakken, J. P., & Scruggs, T. E. (1991). Mathematics instruction for individuals with mental retardation: A perspective and research synthesis. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 115-129.
15. Miller, S. P., Butler, F. M., & Lee, K. (1998). Validated practices for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1-24.
16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and NCTM Standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
17. th Congress, First Session.
18. Scott, K. S. (1993). Multisensory mathematics for children with mild disabilities. Exceptionality, 4, 97-111.
19. Simon, R., & Hanrahan.J. (2004). An evaluation of the touch math method for teaching addition to students with learning disabilities in mathematics. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 191-209. (Pubitemid 38678682)
20. Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249-274. (Pubitemid 44116402)
21. U. S. Department of Education. (2007). Twenty-ninth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: Author.
22. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
23. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavioral analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
24. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Werder, J. K. (1994). Woodcock-McGrew-Werder Mini-Battery of Achievement Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
25. Xin, Y. P., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A metaanalysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 207-225.