From the impact of french guidelines to reduce episiotomy's rate;De l'impact des RPC pour réduire le taux d'épisiotomie

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 62-68

  Reinbold, D ^a   Eboue C ^a   Morello, R ^a   Lamendour, N ^a   Herlicoviez, M ^a   Dreyfus, M ^a  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Episiotomy; High degree perineal tears; Medical practice assessment; Professional guidelines; Restrictive and liberal policy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DELIVERY; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; MULTIPARA; PERINEUM INJURY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMIPARA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TEACHING HOSPITAL; VACUUM EXTRACTION;

ADULT; ANAL CANAL; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; FRANCE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; LACERATIONS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PARITY; PERINEUM; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84856425925     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: 17730430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : l'épisiotomie. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2006; 35;1S1-80.
2. H. Faruel-Fosse, and F. Vendittelli Peut-on réduire le taux d'épisiotomies ? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 35 2006 1S68 76S
3. A. Eckman, R. Ramanah, E. Gannard, M.C. Clement, G. Collet, and L. Courtois Évaluation d'une politique restrictive d'épisiotomie avant et aprs les recommandations du Collge national des gynécologues obstétriciens franais J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 39 2010 37 42
4. F. Vendittelli, O. Rivire, C. Crenn-Hebert, O. Claris, V. Tessier, and D. Pinquier Réseau sentinelle Audipog 2004-2005. Partie 2 : évaluation des pratiques professionnelles Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36 2008 1202 1210
5. S.C. Curtin, and J.A. Martin Preliminary data for 1999. National vital statistics reports vol. 48, No. 14 2000 National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsvile, MD
6. I.D. Graham, and D.F. Graham Episiotomy counts: trends and prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994 Birth 24 1997 141 147 (Pubitemid 127499036)
7. V. Berghella, J.K. Baxter, and S.P. Chauhan Evidence based labor and delivery management Am J Obstet Gynecol 199 2008 445 454
8. M.C. Klein, J. Kaczorowski, J.M. Robbins, R.J. Gauthier, S.H. Jorgensen, and A.K. Joshi Physicians beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care CMAJ 153 1995 769 779
9. M. Cabana, C. Raud, and N. Powel Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement JAMA 282 1999 1468 1475
10. J.M. Macleod, and D.J. Murphy Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136 2008 178 183 (Pubitemid 351173457)
11. L. Lowenstein, A. Drugan, R. Gonen, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, M. Bardicef, and P. Jakobi Episiotomy: beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123 2005 179 182 (Pubitemid 41728362)
12. M.L. Costa, J.G. Cecatti, H.M. Milanez, J.P. Souza, and M. Gülmezoglu Audit and feedback: effects on professional obstetrical practice and healthcare outcomes in a university hospital Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88 2009 793 800
13. M. Koskas, A.L. Caillod, A. Fauconnier, and G. Bader Impact maternel et néonatal des recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF relatives à l'épisiotomie. Étude unicentrique à propos de 5409 accouchements par voie vaginale Gynecol Obstet Fertil 37 2009 697 702
14. J.L. Reynolds Reducing the frequency of episiotomies through a continuous quality improvement program Can Med Assoc J 153 1995 275 282
15. G. Jamtvedt, J.M. Young, D.T. Kristoffersen, M.A. Thomson O'Brien, and A.D. Oxman Audit and feedback: effects on professionnal practice and health care outcomes Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003 CD000259 10.1002/14651858
16. D.R. Gosset, and R.D. Su Episiotomy practice in a community hospital setting J Reprod Med 53 2008 803 808
17. F. Althabe, J.M. Belizan, and E. Bergel Episiotomy rates in primipares women in Latin America: hopsital based descriptive study BJM 324 2002 945 946 (Pubitemid 34429874)
18. J.T. Fullerton, K.A. Hollenbach, and D.L. Wingard Practices styles. A comparison of obstetricians and nurse-midwives J Nurse Midwifery 41 1996 243 250 (Pubitemid 126755894)
19. J.N. Robinson, E.R. Norwitz, A.P. Cohen, and E. Lieberman Predictors of episiotomy use at first spontaneous vaginal delivery Obstet Gynecol 96 2000 214 218 (Pubitemid 30447341)
20. G. Beucher Complications maternelles des extractions instrumentales J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 37 2008 S244 S259
21. K. Demissie, G.G. Rhoads, J.C. Smulian, B.A. Balasubramanian, K. Gandhi, and K.S. Joseph Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis BMJ 329 2004 1 6
22. J.A. Bofill, O.A. Rust, S.J. Schon, R.C. Brown, R.W. Martin, and J.N. Martin A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-Cup vacuum extractor Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 1996 1325 1330 (Pubitemid 26398999)
23. M. Macleod, B. Strachan, R. Bahl, L. Howarth, K. Gayda, and M. Van de Venne A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery BJOG 115 2008 1688 1694
24. E. Hirsch, Haney El, T.E. Gordon, and R.K. Silver Reducing high-order perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 2008 668e1 668e5
25. D. Riethmuller, L. Courtois, and R. Maillet Pratique libérale versus restrictive de l'épisiotomie : existe-t-il des indications obstétricales spécifiques de l'épisiotomie ? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 35 2006 1S32 39S
26. G. Carroli, and J. Belizan Episiotomy for vaginal birth Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 2000 CD000081 [Links]
27. T.B. Henriksen, K.M. Bek, M. Hedegaard, and N.J. Secher Methods and consequences in use of episiotomy BMJ 309 1994 1255 1258
28. F. Althabe, P. Buekens, E. Bergel, J.M. Belizan, M.K. Campbell, and N. Moss A behavorial intervention to improve obstetrical care N Engl J Med 358 2008 1929 1940 (Pubitemid 351620113)
29. M. Mugford, P. Banfield, and M. O'Hanlon Effects of feedback on information on clinical practice: a review BMJ 303 1991 398 402