Maternal and neonatal consequences induced by the French recommendations for episiotomy practice. Monocentric study about 5409 vaginal deliveries;Impact maternel et néonatal des recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF relatives à l'épisiotomie. Étude unicentrique à propos de 5409 accouchements par voie vaginale

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 697-702

  Koskas, M ^a   Caillod, A L ^a   Fauconnier, A ^a   Bader, G ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL   (France)

Author keywords

Episiotomy; Liberal policy; Restrictive policy

Indexed keywords

ANUS SPHINCTER; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISIOTOMY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LACRIMAL FLUID; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEWBORN CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; ANAL CANAL; APGAR SCORE; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERINEUM; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 69949156068     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. D. Riethmuller, L. Courtois, and R. Maillet Pratique libérale versus restrictive de l'épisiotomie : existe-t-il des indications obstétricales spécifiques de l'épisiotomie? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35 2006 1S32-9
2. B. Jacqetin Épisiotomie : contre une utilisation de routine M.T.A. Collet Société Française de Médecine Périnatale 1997 Arnette Paris
3. C. Colette Conséquences d'une fluctuation provoquée du taux des épisiotomies Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 86 1991 303 305
4. T.B. Henriksen, K.M. Bek, M. Hedegaard, and N.J. Secher Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy BMJ 309 1994 1255 1258
5. N. Mamelle, F. Vendittelli, O. Riviere, C. Crenn-Hebert, D. Lemery, and P. Mares et al. La santé périnatale en 2002-2003. L'observatoire des pratiques médicales. Résultats du réseau sentinelle Audipog Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2004 4 22 [32 Spec No 1]
6. Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trial. Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 1993;342:1517-8.
7. C. Dannecker, P. Hillemanns, A. Strauss, U. Hasbargen, H. Hepp, and C. Anthuber Episiotomy and perineal tears presumed to be imminent: randomized controlled trial Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83 2004 364 368
8. S. Anthony, S.E. Buitendijk, K.T. Zondervan, E.J. van Rijssel, and P.H. Verkerk Episiotomies and the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101 1994 1064 1067
9. A.C. Poen, R.J. Felt-Bersma, G.A. Dekker, W. Deville, M.A. Cuesta, and S.G. Meuwissen Third-degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1997 563 566
10. V. Dandolu, A. Chatwani, O. Harmanli, C. Floro, J.P. Gaughan, and E. Hernandez Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16 2005 304 307
11. Épisiotomie : recommandations du CNGOF pour la pratique clinique (décembre 2005). Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2006;34:275-9.
12. F. Vendittelli, O. Riviere, C. Crenn-Hebert, O. Claris, V. Tessier, and D. Pinquier et al. Réseau sentinelle Audipog 2004-2005. Partie 2 : évaluation des pratiques professionnelles Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36 2008 1202 1210
13. J.A. Bofill, O.A. Rust, S.J. Schorr, R.C. Brown, R.W. Martin, and J.N. Martin Jr. et al. A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 1996 1325 1330
14. J.L. Ecker, W.M. Tan, R.K. Bansal, J.T. Bishop, and S.J. Kilpatrick Is there a benefit to episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery? Observations over ten years in a stable population Am J Obstet Gynecol 176 1997 411 414
15. M. Macleod, B. Strachan, R. Bahl, L. Howarth, K. Goyder, and M. Van de Venne et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery BJOG 115 2008 1688 1694
16. M. Macleod, and D.J. Murphy Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136 2008 178 183
17. D.J. Murphy, M. Macleod, R. Bahl, K. Goyder, L. Howarth, and B. Strachan A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study BJOG 115 2008 1695 1702 [discussion 1702-3]
18. P. Shiono, M.A. Klebanoff, and J.C. Carey Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet Gynecol l 75 1990 765 770
19. J. Sleep, A. Grant, J. Garcia, D. Elbourne, J. Spencer, and I. Chalmers West Berkshire perineal management trial Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 289 1984 587 590
20. B. Blondel, and M. Kaminski Episiotomy and third-degree tears Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92 1985 1297 1298
21. X. Fritel, and A. Pigne Pour ou contre l'épisiotomie? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 29 2001 634 635
22. Z. Weiner, I. Ben-Shlomo, R. Beck-Fruchter, Y. Goldberg, and E. Shalev Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational-age fetus Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 105 2002 20 24
23. S.E. Ponkey, A.P. Cohen, L.J. Heffner, and E. Lieberman Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes Obstet Gynecol 101 2003 915 920
24. J. Senecal, X. Xiong, and W.D. Fraser Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome Obstet Gynecol 105 2005 763 772
25. S.L. Bloom, B.M. Casey, J.I. Schaffer, D.D. McIntire, and K.J. Leveno A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 2006 10 13
26. V. Berghella, J.K. Baxter, and S.P. Chauhan Evidence-based labor and delivery management Am J Obstet Gynecol 199 2008 445 454