Local consensus processes: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Paulsen, Elizabeth ^a   Fretheim, A ^b   Oxman, A D ^b  

^a Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Services   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HEALTH CARE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; REVIEW;

EID: 44949122736     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003165.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Black 1998 Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, McKee M, Sanderson C, Askham J. Consensus development methods for creating clinical guidelines. Health services research methods: a guide to best practice. BMJ Books, 1998:199-211.
2. EHC 1994 Implementing clinical practice guidelines: can guidelines be used to improve clinical practice?. Effective Health Care 1994; Vol. 8:1-12.
3. Grimshaw 1993 Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993;342:1317-22.
4. Lomas 1993 Lomas J. Making clinical policy explicit. Legislative policy making and lessons for developing practice guidelines. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1993;9:11-25.
5. Murphy 1998 Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CFB, Askham J, et al.Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment 1998;2(3).
6. Pagliari 2001 Pagliari CP, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Potential influence of small group processes on guideline development. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2001;7:165-73.
7. SPGP 1992 North of England Study of Standards, Performance in General Practice. Medical audit in general practice. I: effects on doctors' clinical behaviour for common childhood conditions. BMJ 1992;304:1480-8.