MDCT to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Mitral Valve Repair

Cardiology Clinics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 147-160

  Leipsic, Jonathon ^a   Hague, Cameron J ^a   Gurvitch, Ronen ^a   Ajlan, Amr M ^a   Labounty, Troy M ^b   Min, James K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Coronary sinus annuloplasty; Mitral valve repair

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BALLOON DILATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE ANNULOPLASTY; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84856423645     PISSN: 07338651     EISSN: 15582264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.10.003     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Nkomo V.R., Gardin J.M., Skelton T.N., et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases. Lancet 2006, 368:1005-1011.
2. Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Kanu C., et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:e1-e148.
3. Iung B., Baron G., Butchart E.G., et al. Prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe. Eur Heart J 2003, 24:1231-1243.
4. Svensson L.G., Dewey T., Kapadia S., et al. United States feasibility study of transcatheter insertion of a stented aortic valve by the left ventricular apex. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 86:46-55.
5. Walther T., Falk V., Kempfert J., et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation; the initial 50 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008, 33:983-988.
6. Grube E., Schuler G., Buellesfeld L., et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. JAm Coll Cardiol 2007, 50:69-76.
7. Webb J.G., Pasupati S., Humphries K., et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2007, 116:755-763.
8. Walther T., Simon P., Dewey T., et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 2007, 116:I240-I245.
9. Leon M.B., Smith C.R., Mack M., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. NEngl J Med 2010, 363(17):1597-1607.
10. Smith C.R., Leon M.B., Mack M.J., et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. NEngl J Med 2011, 364(23):2187-2198.
11. Ye J., Cheung A., Lichtenstein S.V., et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation in humans. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 131:1194-1196.
12. Grube E., Laborde J.C., Gerckens U., et al. Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg First-In-Man study. Circulation 2006, 114:1616-1624.
13. Al Ali A.M., Altwegg L., Horlick E.M., et al. Prevention and management of transcatheter balloon-expandable aortic valve malposition. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 72:573-578.
14. Tuzcu M.E. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement malposition and embolization: innovation brings solutions also new challenges. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 72:579-580.
15. Thomas M., Schymik G., Walther T., et al. Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: a European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation 2010, 122(1):62-69.
16. Van Mieghem N.M., Nuis R.J., Piazza N., et al. Vascular complications with transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the 18 Fr Medtronic CoreValve System(R): the Rotterdam experience. EuroIntervention 2010, 5:673-679.
17. Tchetche D., Dumonteil N., Sauguet A., et al. Thirty-day outcome and vascular complications after transarterial aortic valve implantation using both Edwards Sapien and Medtronic CoreValve bioprostheses in a mixed population. EuroIntervention 2010, 5(6):659-665.
18. Sharp A.S., Michev I., Maisano F., et al. Anew technique for vascular access management in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 75(5):784-793.
19. Leon M., Piazza N., Nikolsky E., et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 57:253-269.
20. Toggweiler, Leipsic J, Gurvitch R, etal. Improved vascular outcomes with a fully percutaneous procedure. JACC 2011, in press.
21. Kurra V., Schoenhagen P., Roselli E.E., et al. Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 137:1258-1264.
22. Descoutures F., Himbert D., Lepage L., et al. Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:1410-1417.
23. Masson J.B., Kovac J., Schuler G., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 2:811-820.
24. Hayashida K., Lefevre T., Chevalier B., et al. Transfemoral aortic valve implantation new criteria to predict vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 4:851-858.
25. Gurvitch R., Wood D., Leipsic J., et al. Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimalangiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 3(11):1157-1165.
26. Kurra V., Kapadia S., Tuzcu M., et al. Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions comparison between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 3:105-113.
27. Ng A., Delgado V., van der Kley F., et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010, 3:94-102.
28. Tops L.F., Wood D.A., Delgado V., et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography. Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAm Coll Cardiol Img 2008, 1:321-330.
29. Anderson R.H., Lal M., Ho S.Y. Anatomy of the aortic root with particular emphasis on options for its surgical enlargement. JHeart Valve Dis 1996, 5(Suppl 3):S249-S257.
30. Messika-Zeitoun D., Serfaty J.M., Brochet E., et al. Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter. JAm Coll Cardiol 2010, 55:186-194.
31. Leipsic J., Gurvitch R., Labounty T.M., et al. Multi-detector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4(4):416-429.
32. Delgado V., Ng A.C., van de Veire N.R., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:1114-1123.
33. Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R, etal. Aortic annulus diameter determination by multi-detector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Interventions, in press.
34. Webb J.G., Altwegg L., Boone R.H., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on clinical and valve-related outcomes. Circulation 2009, 119(23):3009-3016.
35. Wood D.A., Tops L.F., Webb J.G., et al. Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 2009, 103:1295-1301.
36. Joshi S., Mendoza D., Steinberg D., et al. Ultra-low dose intra-arterial contrast injection for iliofemoral computed tomographic angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:1404-1411.
37. Inoue K., Owaki T., Nakamura T., et al. Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984, 87:394-402.
38. Pate G.E., Al Zubaidi A., Chandavimol M., et al. Percutaneous closure of prosthetic paravalvular leaks: case series and review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006, 68:528-533.
39. Pate G.E., Thompson C.R., Munt B.I., et al. Techniques for percutaneous closure of prosthetic paravalvular leaks. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006, 67:158-166.
40. Hein R., Wunderlich N., Wilson N., et al. New concepts in transcatheter closure of paravalvular leaks. Future Cardiol 2008, 4:373-378.
41. Perloff J.K., Rogers W.C. The mitral apparatus: functional anatomy of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1972, 46:227-239.
42. Chiam P.T., Ruiz C.E. Technology percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve repair: a classification of the technology. JAm Coll Cardiol Interv 2011, 4:1-13.
43. Savage E.B., Ferguson B., DiSesa V.J. Use of mitral valve repair: analysis of contemporary United States experience reported to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2003, 75:820-825.
44. Bach D.S., Bolling S.F. Improvement following correction of secondary mitral regurgitation in end-stage cardiomyopathy with mitral annuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 1996, 78:966-969.
45. Webb J.G., Harnek J., Munt B.I., et al. Percutaneous transvenous mitral annuloplasty: initial human experience with device implantation in the coronary sinus. Circulation 2006, 113:851-855.
46. Maselli D., Guarracino F., Chiaramonti F., et al. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty: an anatomic study of human coronary sinus and its relation with mitral valve annulus and coronary arteries. Circulation 2006, 114:377-380.
47. Tops L.F., Van de Veire N.R., Schuijf J.D., et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary sinus anatomy and its relation to the mitral valve annulus: implications for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty. Circulation 2007, 115:1426-1432.
48. Choure A.J., Garcia M.J., Hesse B., et al. Invivo analysis of the anatomical relationship of coronary sinus to mitral annulus and left circumflex coronary artery using cardiac multidetector computed tomography: implications for percutaneous coronary sinus mitral annuloplasty. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1938-1945.
49. Plass A., Valenta I., Gaemperli O., et al. Assessment of coronary sinus anatomy between normal and insufficient mitral valves by multi-slice computer tomography for mitral annuloplasty device implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008, 33:583-589.
50. Sorgente A., Truong Q.A., Conca C., et al. Influence of left atrial and ventricular volumes on the relation between mitral valve annulus and coronary sinus. Am J Cardiol 2008, 102:890-896.
51. Goldberg S.L., Van Bibber R., Schofer J., et al. The frequency of coronary artery compression and management using a removable mitral annuloplasty device in the coronary sinus. JAm Coll Cardiol 2008, 51(10 Suppl B):28.
52. Feldman T., Wasserman H.S., Herrmann H.C., et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the edge-to-edge technique: six-month results of the EVEREST phase I clinical trial. JAm Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:2134-2140.
53. Swaans M.J., Van den Branden B.J., Van der Heyden J.A., et al. Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in a patient undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair using the edge-to-edge clip technique. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009, 10:982-983.
54. Feldman T., Glower D. Patient selection for percutaneous mitral valve repair: insight from early clinical trial applications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008, 5:84-90.
55. Willmann J.K., Kobza R., Roos J.E., et al. ECG-gated multi-detector CT for assessment of mitral valve disease: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2002, 12:2662-2669.
56. Messika-Zeitoun D., Serfaty J.M., Laissy J.P., et al. Assessment of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:411-413.
57. Shanks M., Delgado V., Ng A.C., et al. Mitral valve morphology assessment: three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography versus computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 90(6):1922-1929.