Developing maturity models for it management - A procedure model and its application;Entwicklung von reifegradmodellen für das it-management - VorgehensModell und praktische anwendung

Business and Information Systems Engineering

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 249-260

  Becker, Jörg ^a   Knackstedt, Ralf ^a   Pöppelbuß, Jens ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Design science; Epistemology; IT management; IT Performance Measurement; Maturity model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856394491     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18670202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11576-009-0167-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Becker J., Knackstedt R., Pöppelbuß J (2009) Dokumentationsqualität von Reifegradmodellentwicklungen. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Nr. 123, WWU Münster
2. Bendl H., Gleich R., Kraus P (2004) Wettbewerbsvorteile durch strategieorientierte Steuerung der IT. Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 41 (239) :39-47
3. Boehm BW (1981) Software engineering economics. Prentice-Hall
4. Chamoni P., Gluchowski P (2004) Integrationstrends bei Business-lntelligence-Systemen. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK46 (2) :119-128
5. CMMI Product Team (2006) CMMI for development. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ pub/documents/06.reports/pdf/06tr008.pdf. Abrufam 2008-07-30
6. Cook CR, Visconti M (2000) Documentation process maturity. http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~cook/doc/documentation.htm. Abruf am 2008-12-12
7. Covey RW, Hixon DJ (2005) The creation and use of an Analysis Capability Maturity Model (ACMM). http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDo c?AD=ADA436426&Location=U2&doc=GetTR Docpdf. Abruf am 2008-07-30
8. de Bruin T., Rosemann M (2007) Using the Delphi technique to identify BPM capability areas. In: Proceedings of the 18th Australiasian conference on information systems (ACIS), Toowoomba
9. de Bruin T., Rosemann M., Freeze R., Kulkarni U (2005) Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In: Proceedings of the 16th Australasian conference on information systems (ACIS), Sydney
10. DIN (1966) DIN 66001: Sinnbilder fur Datenflußund Programmablaufpläne. http://www.fh-jena.de/~kleine/history/software/ DIN66001-1966.pdf. Abruf am 2008-12-12
11. Eckerson W (2006) Performance dashboards: measuring, monitoring, and managing your business. Wiley, Hoboken
12. Eul M., Hanssen S., Herzwurm G (2006) Systematische Leistungsbestimmung in der IT. Controlling (1) :25-30
13. Frank U (2004) E-MEMO: Referenzmodelle zur ökonomischen Realisierung leistungsfähiger Infrastrukturen für Electronic Commerce. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK46 (5) :373-381
14. Freeze R., Kulkarni U (2005) Knowledge management capability assessment: validating a knowledge assets measurement instrument. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences
15. Grothe M., Gentsch P (2000) Business Intelligence: aus Informationen Wettbewerbsvorteile gewinnen. Addison-Wesley, München
16. Henderson JC, Venkatraman N (1993) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 38 (2&3) :472-484
17. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J., Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28 (1) 75-105
18. IT Governance Institute (2007) COBIT4.1. The IT Governance Institute
19. Kulkarni U., Freeze R (2004) Development and validation of a knowledge management capability assessment model. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on information systems (ICIS)
20. Lee J., Lee D., Sungwon K (2007) An overview of the Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM). In: Proceedings of the international workshop on process aware information systems (PAIS 2007), Huang Shan (Yellow Mountain), China
21. March ST, Smith G (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15 (4) :251-266
22. Marshall S (2007) E-Learning Maturity Model, http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/ research/emm/index.shtml. Abruf am 2008-07-22
23. McFarlan FW, Nolan RL (2003) Why IT does matter. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ item/3637.html. Abruf am 2008-12-09
24. Müller A., von Thiemen L., Schröder H (2006) ITControlling. So messen Sie den Beitrag der Informationstechnologie zum Unternehmenserfolg. Der Controlling-Berater (1) :99-122
25. Paulk M., Curtis B., Chrissis M., Weber C (1993) Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/93. reports/pdf/tr24.93.pdf. Abruf am 2008-07-23
26. Peffers K., Tuunanen T., Rothenburger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3) :45-77
27. Philippi J., Gronwald H., Schulze K-D, Dittmar C., MüllerT (2006) Business Intelligence-Studie 2006. Steria Mummert Consulting AG, Düsseldorf
28. Pößneck L (2007) IT does matter - sagen Analysten. http://www.silicon. de/cio/strategie/0, 39038989, 39183665, 00/it+does+matter +sagen+analysten.htm. Abruf am 2008-12-09
29. Renken J (2004) Developing an IS/ICT management capability maturity framework. In: Proceedings of the research conference of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT), Stellenbosch
30. Rosemann M., de Bruin T., Power B (2006) A model to measure business process management maturity and improve performance. In: Jeston J., Nelis J (Hrsg) Business process management
31. van Grembergen W., Saull R (2001) Aligning business and information technology through the balanced scorecard at a major Canadian financial group. Its status measured with an IT BSC maturity model. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Hawaii
32. Wettstein T., Küng P (2002) A maturity model for performance measurement systems. Department of Informatics, Fribourg University, Schweiz
33. Zelewski S (2007) Kann Wissenschaftstheorie behilflich für die Publikationspraxis sein? In: Lehner F., Zelewski S (Hrsg) Wissenschaftstheoretische Fundierung und wissenschaftliche Orientierung der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Berlin