Mites and leaf domatia: No evidence of mutualism in Coffea arabica plants;Ácaros e domácias foliares: Sem evidências de mutualismo em plantas de coffea arabica

Biota Neotropica

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 27-34

  Romero, Gustavo Quevedo ^a,e   Daud, Rodrigo Damasco ^b   Salomão, Adriana Trevizoli ^a   Martins, Luiz Fernando ^c   Feres, Reinaldo José Fazzio ^d,e   Benson, Woodruff Whitman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^c Fundacentro/RJ   (Brazil)

^d SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^e Pesquisador bolsista do CNPq   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Atlantic rain forest; Mite community; Mite plant interactions; Mutualism breakdown; Space limitation

Indexed keywords

ACARI; COFFEA ARABICA;

EID: 84856391778     PISSN: 16786424     EISSN: 16760611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1676-06032011000100002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AGRAWAL, A.A., KARBAN, R. & COLFER, R.G. 2000. How leaf domatia and induced plant resistance affect herbivores, natural enemies and plant performance. Oikos 89:70-80.
2. BERNACCI, L.C. & Leitão-Filho, H.F. 1996. Flora fanerogâmica da floresta da Fazenda São Vicente, Campinas, SP. Rev. Bras. Bot. 19(2):149-164.
3. COSTE, R. 1992. Coffee: the plant and the product. MacMillan Press, London, UK.
4. FARAJI, F., JANSSEN, A. & SABELIS, M.W. 2002a. The benefits of clustering eggs: the role of egg predation and larval cannibalism in a predatory mite. Oecologia 131(1): 20-26.
5. FARAJI, F., JANSSEN, A. & SABELIS, M.W. 2002b. Oviposition patterns in a predatory mite reduce the risk of egg predation caused by prey. Ecol. Entomol. 27(6):660-664.
6. FONSECA, C.R. 1999. Amazonian ant-plants interactions and the nesting space limitation hypothesis. J. Trop. Ecol. 15:807-825.
7. Grombone-Guaratini, M.T. 1999. Dinâmica de uma floresta estacional semidecidual: o banco, a chuva de sementes e o estrato de regeneração. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brasil.
8. GROSTAL, P. & O'dowd, D.J. 1994. Leaf domatia and abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Oecologia 97(3):308-315.
9. HURLBERT, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54(2):187-211.
10. KLIRONOMOS, J.N. 2003. Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84(9):2292-2301.
11. nd ed. Oregon State University Book Stores, Corvallis, USA.
12. Leitão-Filho, H.F. 1995. A vegetação da Reserva de Santa Genebra. Ecologia e preservação de uma floresta tropical urbana (H.F. Leitão-Filho & P.C. Morellato, org.). Editora da UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil, p. 19-29.
13. MARTINS, S.V. & RODRIGUES, R.R. 2005. Assessing the role of the canopy gap characteristics in the regeneration of shrub and tree species in a semideciduous mesophytic forest in south-eastern Brazil. New research on forest ecosystems (A.R. Burk, ed.). Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA, p. 93-112.
14. MATOS, C.H.C., PALLINI, A., CHAVES, F.F. & GALBIATI, C. 2004. Domácias do cafeeiro beneficiam o ácaro predador Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae)? Neotrop. Entomol. 33(1):57-63.
15. MATOS, C.H.C., PALLINI, A., CHAVES, F.F., SCHOEREDER, J.H. & JANSSEN, A. 2006. Do domatia mediate mutualistic interactions between coffee plants and predatory mites? Entomol. Exper. Appl. 118(3):185-192.
16. MCMURTRY J.A. & CROFT, B.A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 42:291-321.
17. MELLO, M.H.A., Pedro Jr., M.J., ORTOLANI, A.A. & ALFONSI, R.R. 1994. Chuva e temperatura: cem anos de observações em Campinas. Instituto Agronômico, Campinas. Boletim Técnico 154.
18. MINEIRO, J.L.C., SATO, M.E., RAGA, A. & ARTHUR, V. 2008. Population dynamics of phytophagous and predaceous mites on coffee in Brazil, with emphasis on Brevipalpus phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 44(4):277-291.
19. MORAES, G.J. & FLECHTMANN, C.H.W. 2008. Manual de acarologia: acarologia básica e ácaros de plantas cultivadas no Brasil. Editora Holos, Ribeirão Preto, 288p.
20. NAKAMURA, T., TANIGUSHI, T. & MAEDA, E. 2002. Leaf anatomy of Coffea arabica L. with reference to domatia. Jap. J. Crop. Sci. 61(4):642-650.
21. NESS, J.H. 2003. Contrasting exotic Solenopsis invicta and native Forelius pruinosus ants as mutualists with Catalpa bignonioides, a native plant. Ecol. Entomol. 28(2):247-251.
22. NISHI, A.H. & ROMERO, G.Q. 2008. Colonization pattern of Cecropia by Azteca ants: influence of plant ontogeny, environment and host plant choice by queens. Sociobiology 52(2):367-376.
23. NISHIDA, S., NAIKI, A. & NISHIDA, T. 2005. Morphological variation in leaf domatia enables coexistence of antagonistic mites in Cinnamomum camphora. Can. J. Bot. 83(1):93-101.
24. NORTON, A.P., English-Noeb, G., GADOURY, D. & SEEM, R.C. 2000. Mycophagous mites and foliar pathogens: leaf domatia mediate tritrophic interactions in grapes. Ecology 81(2):490-499.
25. NORTON, A.P., English-Noeb, G. & BELDEN, E. 2001. Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators. Oecologia 126(4):535-542.
26. O'dowd, D.J. 1994. Mite association with the leaf domatia of coffee (Coffea arabica) in North Queensland, Australia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 84:361-366.
27. O'dowd, D.J. & WILLSON, M.F. 1989. Leaf domatia and mites on Australasian plants: ecological and evolutionary implications. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37(3):191-236.
28. ONZO, A., HANNA, R., ZANNOU, I., SABELIS, M.W. & YANINEK, J.S. 2003. Dynamics of refuge use: diurnal, vertical migration by predatory and herbivorous mites within cassava plants. Oikos 101(1):59-69.
29. PEMBERTON, R.W. & TURNER, C.E. 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. Am. J. Bot. 76(1):105-112.
30. RODA, A., NYROP, J., DICKE, M. & English-Loeb, G. 2000. Trichomes and spider-mite webbing protect predatory mite eggs from intraguild predation. Oecologia 125(3):428-435.
31. ROMERO, G.Q. & BENSON, W.W. 2004. Leaf domatia mediate mutualism between mites and tropical tree. Oecologia 140(4):609-616.
32. ROMERO, G.Q. & BENSON, W.W. 2005. Biotic interactions of mites, plants and leaf domatia. Cur. Opin. Plant Biol. 8(4):436-440.
33. SERRÃO, S.M. 2002. Para além dos domínios da mata: uma discussão sobre o processo de preservação da Reserva da Mata Santa Genebra, Campinas SP. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brasil.
34. SHIMBER, T., KUFA, T. & YILMA, A. 2002. The effect of established shade trees on the growth and yield of Arabica coffee in two planting patterns. In International Conference on Coffee Science (ASIC). Trieste, Italy.
35. VEGA, F.E., OCHOA, R., ASTORGA, C. & WALTER, D.E. 2007. Mites (Arachnida: Acari) inhabiting coffee domatia: a short review and recent findings from Costa Rica. Internat. J. Acarol. 33(4):291-295.
36. WALTER, D.E. 1996. Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 41:101-114.
37. WALTER, D.E. & O'dowd, D.J. 1992. Leaves with domatia have more mites. Ecology 73(4):1514-1518.