Do coffee domatia benefit the predatory mite Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae)?;Domácias do cafeeiro beneficiam o ácaro predador Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae)?

Neotropical Entomology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 57-63

  Matos, Cláudia H C ^a   Angelo, Pallini ^a   Chaves, Fredson F ^a   Galbiati, Carla ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biological control; Coffee plant; Plant predator mutualism

Indexed keywords

ACARI; COFFEA ARABICA; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; IPHISEIODES ZULUAGAI; PHYTOSEIIDAE;

EID: 20444440204     PISSN: 1519566X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1519-566X2004000100011     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agrawal, A.A. 1997. Do leaf domatia mediate a plant-mite mutualism? An experimental test of the effects on predators and herbivores. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 371-376.
2. Agrawal, A.A. 2000. Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Curr. Opinion Plant Biol. 3: 329-335.
3. Agrawal, A.A. & R. Karban. 1997. Domatia mediate plant-arthropod mutualism. Nature 387: 562-563.
4. Agrawal, A.A., R. Karban & R. Colfer. 2000. How leaf domatia and induced plant resistance affect herbivores, natural enemies and plant performance. Oikos 89: 70-80.
5. Bitancourt, A. 1927. A acarofilia do cafeeiro e seu papel eventual na defesa da planta contra os fungos parasitos. Bol. Biol. 10:25-47.
6. Brouwer, Y.M. & H.T. Clifford. 1990. An annotated list of domatia-bearing species. Notes from the Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Bot. Gardens, Kew 12: 1-33.
7. Cortesero, M.A., J.O. Stapel & W.J. Lewis. 2000. Understanding and manipulating plant attributes to enhance biological control. Biol. Control 17: 35-49.
8. Dicke, M. 1999. Evolution of induced indirect defense of plants. p.62-88. In Harvell, C.D. & R. Tollrian (eds.), The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton, University Press, 395p.
9. Dicke, M. & M.W. Sabelis. 1988. How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards. Neth. J. Zool. 38:148-165.
10. Eubanks, M.D. & R.F. Denno. 1999. The ecological consequences of variation in plants and prey for an omnivorous insects. Ecology 80: 1253-1266.
11. Grostal, P. & D.J. O'Dowd. 1994. Plants, mites and mutualism: leaf domatia and the abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliacea). Oecologia 97: 308-315.
12. Harborne, J.B. 1993. Introduction to ecological biochemistry. London, Academic Press, 429p.
13. Heil, M., B. Fiala, K.E. Linsenmair, G. Zotz, P. Menke & U. Maschwitz. 1997. Food body production in Macaranga triloba (Euphorbiaceae): a plant investiment in ant-herbivore defense via symbiotic ant partners. J. Ecol. 85: 847-861.
14. Instituto Brasileiro do Café. 1985. Cultivo do café Conilon. p.527-556. In IBC, Cultura do café no Brasil: manual de recomendações. Rio de Janeiro, IBC/GERCA, 580p.
15. Karban, R., G. Englishloeb, M.A. Walker & J. Thaler. 1995. Abundance of phytoseiid mites on Vitis species - Effects of leaf hairs, domatia, prey abundance, and plant phylogeny. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19: 189-197.
16. Komatsu, S.S. 1988. Aspectos bioetológicos de Euseius concordis (Chant, 1959) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) e seletividade dos acaricidas convencionais nos citros. Dissertação de Mestrado, ESALQ/USP, 117p.
17. Lorenzato, D. 1987. Controle biológico de ácaros fitófagos na cultura da macieira no município de Farroupilha, RS. Agron. Sulriogrand. 2: 167-183.
18. Lundstroem, A.N. 1887. Pflanzenbiologische studien II. Die anpassungen der pflanzenan thiere. Domatienführende pflanzen. p.1-88. In M.J. Mariani (ed.), Les caféiers. L' Université de Paris, Paris, 137p.
19. Marquis, R.J. & C. Whelan. 1996. Plant morphology and recruitment of third trophic level: subtle and little-recognized defenses? Oikos 75: 330-334.
20. Mauricio, R. & M.D. Rusher. 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51: 1435-1444.
21. McMurtry, J.A. & G.T. Scriven. 1964. Studies on the feeding, reproduction, and development of Amblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various food substances. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57: 649-655.
22. Moraes, G.J. de. 1986. Controle biológico de ácaros fitófagos. Miscelânea 8:29-63.
23. Moraes, G.J. de. 1992. Perspectivas para o uso de predadores no controle de ácaros fitófagos no Brasil. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. S/N: 263,270.
24. Norton, A.P., G. English-Loeb, D.M. Gadoury & R.C. Seem. 2000. Mycophagous mite and foliar pathogens: leaf domatia mediate tritrophic interactions in grapes. Ecology 81: 490-499.
25. O'Dowd, D.J. 1994. Mite association with the leaf domatia of coffee (Coffea arabica) in North Queensland, Australia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 84: 361-366.
26. O'Dowd, D.J. & R.W. Pemberton. 1998. Leaf domatia and foliar mite abundance in broadleaf deciduous forest of north Asia. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 70-78.
27. Pallini Filho, A. 1991. Acarofauna e predação de ácaros fitófagos por ácaros predadores em cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.) no sul de Minas Gerais. Dissertação de Mestrado, ESAL, 91p.
28. Pallini Filho, A., G.J de Moraes & V.H.P. Bueno. 1992. Ácaros associados ao cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.) no Sul de Minas Gerais. Ci. Prát. 16: 303-307.
29. Pemberton, R.W. & C.E. Turner. 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 105-112.
30. Reis, P.R. & E.B. Alves. 1997. Criação do ácaro predador Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae) em laboratório. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 26: 565-568.
31. Reis, P.R., E.B. Alves & E.O. Souza 1997. Biologia do ácaro-vermelho do cafeeiro Oligonychus ilicis (McGregor, 1917). Cienc. Agrotec. 21: 260-266.
32. Reis, P.R., L.V. Chiavegato & E.B. Alves. 1998. Biologia de Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae). An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 27: 185-191.
33. Rosenthal, G.A. & M. Berenbaum. 1991. Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. San Diego, Academic Press, 550p.
34. Rozario, S.A. 1995. Association between mites and leaf domatia - Evidence from Bangladesh, South-Asia. J. Trop. Ecol. 11: 99-108.
35. Schicha, E. & D.J. O'Dowd. 1993. New Australian species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina) from leaf domatia. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 32: 297-305.
36. Tanigoshi, L.K. 1982. Advances in knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. p.1-222. In M.A. Hoy (ed.), Recent advances in knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. California, Division of Agriculture Sciences, 92p.
37. Turner, C.E. & R.W. Pemberton. 1989. Leaf domatia and mites: a plant protection-mutualism hypothesis, p.341-359. In J.H. Bock & Y.B. Linhart (eds.), The evolutionary ecology of plants. Colorado, Westview Press, 600p.
38. Walter, D.E. 1996. Living on leaves: Mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 8: 307-344.
39. Walter, D.E. & D.J. O'Dowd. 1992. Leaf morphology and predators: Effect of domatia on the abundance of predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 21: 478-484.
40. Walter, D.E. & D.J. O'Dowd. 1997. The good, the bad, and the ugly: which really inhabit domatia?, p. 215-220. In G.R Needham, R.D. Mitchell, D.J. Horn & W.C. Welbourn (eds.), Acarology IX: Symposia. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus. Ohio, IX International Congress of Acarology, Columbus, OH.