Behavioral approach and reward processing: Results on feedback-related negativity and P3 component

Biological Psychology

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 416-425

  Lange, Sebastian ^a   Leue, Anja ^a   Beauducel, André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Behavioral approach system; Behavioral inhibition system; ERP; Feedback related negativity; P3; Reinforcement; Reward expectation mismatch; Reward sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPECTATION; FEEDBACK LOCKED P3; FEEDBACK RELATED NEGATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; RESPONSE TIME; REVISED REINFORCEMENT SENSITIVITY THEORY; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY;

ADULT; AFFECT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; REWARD;

EID: 84856349569     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Amodio D.M., Master S.L., Yee C.M., Taylor S.E. Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:11-19.
2. Avila C., Parcet M.A. The role of Gray's impulsivity in anxiety-mediated differences in resistance to extinction. European Journal of Personality 2000, 14:185-198.
3. Balconi M., Crivelli D. FRN and P300 ERP effect modulation in response to feedback sensitivity: The contribution of punishment-reward system (BIS/BAS) and behaviour identification of action. Neuroscience Research 2010, 66:162-172.
4. Bellebaum C., Daum I. Learning related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity. European Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 27:1823-1835.
5. Bellebaum C., Polezzi D., Daum I. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3343-3350.
6. Blom G. Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta Variables 1958, Wiley, New York.
7. Carver C.S., White T.L. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:319-333.
8. Cohen M.X., Elger C.E., Ranganath C. Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra. Neuroimage 2007, 35:968-978.
9. Corr P.J. Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: a commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences 2001, 30:333-352.
10. Corr P.J. J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 2002, 33:511-532.
11. Corr P.J. Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2004, 28:317-332.
12. Corr P.J. The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
14. DePascalis V., Varriale V., D'Antuono L. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity. Clinical Neurophysiology 2010, 121:60-76.
15. Donchin E. Surprise!. Suprise!. Psychophysiology 1981, 18:493-513.
16. Frank M.J., Woroch B.S., Curran T. Error-related negativity predicts reinforcement learning and conflict biases. Neuron 2005, 47:495-501.
17. Gable S.L., Reis H.T., Elliot A.J. Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:1135-1149.
18. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295:279-282.
19. Gray J.A. Causal theories of personality and how to test them. Multivariate Analysis and Psychological Theory 1973, 409-462. Academic Press, New York. J.R. Royce (Ed.).
20. Gray J.A., McNaughton N. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety 2000, University Press, Oxford.
21. Greenlee M.W., Koessler M., Cornelissen F.W., Mergner T. Visual discrimination and short-term memory for random patterns in patients with a focal cortical lesion. Cerebral Cortex 1997, 7:253-267.
22. Gu R., Yue G., Jiang Y., Luo Y. Anxiety and outcome evaluation: the good, the bad and the ambiguous. Biological Psychology 2010, 85:200-206.
23. Hajcak G., Holroyd C.B., Moser J.S., Simons R.F. Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:161-170.
24. Hajcak G., Holroyd C.B., Moser J.S., Simons R.F. It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:905-912.
25. Hajcak G., Moser J.S., Holroyd C.B., Simons R.F. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology 2006, 71:148-154.
26. Harmon-Jones E., Allen J.J.B. Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1310-1316.
27. Hewig J., Kretschmer N., Trippe R., Hecht H., Coles M., Holroyd C., Miltner W. Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers. Biological Psychiatry 2010, 67:781-783.
28. Hewig J., Trippe R., Hecht H., Coles M., Holroyd C., Miltner W. Decision-making in Blackjack: an electrophysiological analysis. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:865-877.
29. Heym N., Ferguson E., Lawrence C. An evaluation of the relationship between Gray's revised RST and Eysenck's PEN: distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 45:709-715.
30. Hirsch J.B., Inzlicht M. The devil you know: neuroticism predicts neural response to uncertainty. Psychological Science 2008, 19:962-970.
31. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2002, 109:679-709.
32. Holroyd C.B., Hajcak G., Larsen J.T. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli. Brain Research 2006, 1105:93-101.
33. Holroyd C.B., Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Cohen J.D. Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. Neuroreport 2003, 14:2481-2484.
34. Holroyd C.B., Larsen J.T., Cohen J.D. Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:245-253.
35. Holroyd C.B., Yeung N., Coles M.G.H., Cohen J.D. A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:163-191.
36. Jasper H.H. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1958, 10:371-375.
37. Johnson R. On the neural generators of the P300 components of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:90-97.
38. Johnston V.S. Stimuli with biological significance. Evoked Brain Potentials and Behavior 1979, 1-12. Plenum Press, New York. H. Begleiter (Ed.).
39. Kamarajan C., Poresz B., Rangaswamy M., Tang Y., Chorlian D.B., et al. Brain signatures of monetary loss and gain: outcome-related potentials in a single outcome gambling task. Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 197:62-76.
40. Krigolson O.E., Holroyd C.B. Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain. Neuroscience 2006, 137:13-17.
41. Krohne H.W., Egloff B., Kohlmann C.-W., Tausch A. Untersuchung mit einer deutschen Form der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica 1996, 42:139-156.
42. Leue A., Beauducel A. A meta-analysis of reinforcement sensitivity theory: on performance parameters in reinforcement tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12:353-369.
43. Leue A., Brocke B., Hoyer J. Reinforcement sensitivity in sex offenders and non-offenders: an experimental and psychometric study of reinforcement sensitivity theory. British Journal of Psychology 2008, 99:361-378.
44. Leue A., Chavanon M.-L., Wacker J., Stemmler G. On the differentiation of N2-components in an appetitive choice task: evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:1244-1257.
45. Leue A., Lange S. Reliability generalization: an examination of the positive and negative affect schedule. Assessment 2011, 18:487-501.
46. Luu P., Tucker D.M., Derryberry D., Reed M., Poulsen C. Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation. Psychological Science 2003, 14:47-53.
47. McNaughton N. The role of the subiculum within the behavioral inhibition system. Behavioural Brain Research 2006, 174:232-250.
48. McNaughton N., Corr P.J. A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2004, 28:285-305.
49. Meehl P.E. Schizotaxia, schitzotypia, schizophrenia. American Psychologist 1962, 17:827-838.
50. Miltner W.H.R., Braun C.H., Coles M.G.H. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a " generic" neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:788-798.
51. Müller S.V., Möller J., Rodriguez-Fornells A., Münte T.F. Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring. Clinical Neurophysiology 2005, 116:63-74.
52. Nieuwenhuis S., Holroyd C.B., Mol N., Coles M.G.H. Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2004, 28:441-448.
53. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
54. Onado K., Abe S., Yamaguchi S. Feedback-related negativity is correlated with unplanned impulsivity. Neuroreport 2010, 21:736-739.
55. Patton J.H., Stanford M.S., Barratt E.S. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1995, 51:768-774.
56. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:127-152.
57. Polezzi D., Sartori G., Rumiati R., Vidotto G., Daum I. Brain correlates of risky decision-making. Neuroimage 2010, 49:1886-1894.
58. Potts G.F., Martin L.E., Kamp S.M., Donchin E. Neural response to action and reward prediction errors: Comparing the error-related negativity to behavioral errors and the feedback-related negativity to reward prediction violations. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:218-228.
59. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone A.C., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
60. Sato A., Yasuda A., Ohira H., Miyawaki K., Nishikawa M., Kumano H., et al. Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. Neuroreport 2005, 16:407-411.
61. Schuermann B., Kathmann N., Stiglmayr C., Renneberg B., Endrass T. Impaired decision making and feedback evaluation in boderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine 2011, 41:1917-1927.
62. Schultz W. The reward signal of midbrain dopamine neurons. News in Physiological Sciences 1999, 14:249-255.
63. Schultz W. Reward signaling by dopamine neurons. Neuroscientist 2001, 7:293-302.
64. Smillie L.D., Cooper A.J., Pickering A.D. Individual Differences in reward-prediction-error: extraversion and feedback-related negativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2010, 5:1-7.
65. Smillie L.D., Jackson C.J. Functional impulsivity and reinforcement sensitivity theory. Journal of Personality 2006, 74:47-84.
66. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 39:387-401.
67. Strobel A., Beauducel A., Debener S., Brocke B. Psychometrische und strukturelle Merkmale einer deutschsprachigen Version des BIS/BAS Fragebogens von Carver und White [Psychometric and structural features of a German version of the BIS/BAS scales of Carver and White]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 2001, 22:216-227.
68. Sutton S., Tueting P., Hammer M., Hakerem G. Evoked potentials and feedback. Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event-related Potential Research 1978, 184-188. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. D.A. Otto (Ed.).
69. van Meel C.S., van Heijningen C.A. The effect of interpersonal competition on monitoring internal and external error feedback. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:213-222.
70. van Meel C.S., Oosterlaan J., Heslenfeld D.J., Sergeant J.A. Telling good from bad news: ADHD differentially affects processing of positive and negative feedback during guessing. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1946-1954.
71. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the Panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:1063-1070.
72. Yasuda A., Sato A., Miyawaki K., Kumano H., Kuboki T. Error-related negativity reflects detection and negative reward prediction error. Neuroreport 2004, 15:2561-2565.
73. Yeung N., Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D. The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2004, 111:931-959.
74. Yeung N., Holroyd C.B., Cohen J.D. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:535-544.
75. Yeung N., Sanfey A.G. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24:6258-6264.