The effects of scope condition-based participant exclusion on experimental outcomes in expectation states research: A meta-analysis

Social Science Research

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 359-371

  Dippong, Joseph ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective orientation; Expectation states; Hierarchical linear modeling; Meta analysis; Scope conditions; Task orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856328126     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Balkwell J.W. Social decision making behavior: an empirical test of two models. Sociometry 1976, 39(1):19-30.
2. Balkwell J.W. Status characteristics and social interaction: an assessment of theoretical variants. Advances in Group Processes 1991, 135-176. JAI, Greenwich, CT. E.J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, H.A. Walker (Eds.).
3. Berger J. The standardized experimental situation in expectation states research: notes on history, uses, and special features. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences 2007, 353-378. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M. Webster, J. Sell (Eds.).
4. Berger J., Conner T.L. Performance expectations and behavior in small groups. Acta Sociologica 1969, 12(4):186-198.
5. Berger J., Fisek M.H. Consistent and inconsistent characteristics and the determination of power and prestige. Sociometry 1970, 33(3):287-304.
6. Berger J., Cohen B.P., Zelditch M. Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review 1972, 37(3):241-255.
7. Berger J., Fisek M.H., Freese L. Paths of relevance and the determination of power and prestige orders. Pacific Sociological Review 1976, 19(1):45-62.
8. Berger J., Fisek M.H., Norman R.Z., Zelditch M. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-states Approach 1977, Elsevier, New York.
9. Berger J., Rosenholtz S.J., Zelditch M. Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology 1980, 6:479-508.
10. Berger J., Ridgeway C.L., Zelditch M. Construction of status and referential structures. Sociological Theory 2002, 20(2):157-179.
11. Bianchi A.J. Rejecting others' influence: negative sentiment and status in task groups. Sociological Perspectives 2004, 47(4):339-355.
12. Cohen B.P. Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method 1989, Nelson Hall, Chicago. second ed.
13. Cook K., Cronkite R.C., Wagner D.G. Laboratory for Social Research Manual for Experimenters in Expectation States Theory 1974, Stanford University Laboratory for Social Research, Stanford, CA.
14. Driskell J.E., Mullen B. Status, expectations, and behavior: a meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1990, 16(3):541-553.
15. Driskell J.E., Webster M. Status and sentiment in task groups. Status, Network, and Organization 1997, 179-200. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. J. Szmatka, J. Skvoretz, J. Berger (Eds.).
16. Eagly A.H. Involvement as a determinant of response to favorable and unfavorable information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967, 7(3):1-15.
17. Foddy M., Smithson M. Can gender inequalities be eliminated?. Social Psychology Quarterly 1999, 62(4):307-324.
18. Foschi M. Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly 1996, 59(3):237-254.
19. Foschi M. On scope conditions. Small Group Research 1997, 28(4):535-555.
20. Foschi, M., 2008. On collective orientation and the standardized expectation-states experiment: review and assessment. In: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston, MA, August 1-4, 2008.
21. Foschi M., Lapointe V. On conditional hypotheses and gender as a status characteristic. Social Psychology Quarterly 2002, 65(2):146-162.
22. Foschi M., Warriner G.K., Hart S.D. Standards, expectations, and interpersonal influence. Social Psychology Quarterly 1985, 48(2):108-117.
23. Foschi M., Enns S., Lapointe V. Processing performance evaluations in homogeneous task groups: feedback and gender effects. Advances in Group Processes 2001, 185-216. JAI, Greenwich, CT. S.R. Thye, E.J. Lawler, M.W. Macy, H.A. Walker (Eds.).
24. Fox J., Moore J.C. Status characteristics and expectation states: fitting and testing a recent model. Social Psychology Quarterly 1979, 42(2):126-134.
25. Freese L. The generalization of specific performance expectations. Sociometry 1976, 39(3):194-200.
26. Freese L., Cohen B.P. Eliminating status generalization. Sociometry 1973, 36(2):177-193.
27. Harris W.A., Walker H.A. Theory construction and development in sociology: an appropriate framework. Sociological Theory 1992, 10(1):111-117.
28. Harrod W.J. Expectations from unequal rewards. Social Psychology Quarterly 1980, 43(1):126-130.
29. Hembroff L.A. Resolving status inconsistency: an expectation states theory and test. Social Forces 1982, 61(1):183-205.
30. Hembroff L.A., Martin M.W., Sell J. Total performance inconsistency and status generalization: an expectation states formulation. The Sociological Quarterly 1981, 22(3):421-430.
31. Hopcroft R.L. Status characteristics among older individuals: the diminished significance of gender. The Sociological Quarterly 2006, 47(2006):361-374.
32. Johnson B.T., Eagly A.H. Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1989, 106(2):290-314.
33. Kalkhoff W., Thye S.R. Expectation states theory and research: new observations from meta-analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 2006, 35(2):219-249.
34. Kalkhoff W., Younts C.W., Troyer L. Facts and artifacts in research: the case of communication medium, gender, and influence. Social Science Research 2008, 37(3):1008-1021.
35. Markovsky B., Smith L.F., Berger J. Do status interventions persist?. American Sociological Review 1984, 49(3):373-382.
36. Martin M.W., Sell J. The effect of equating status characteristics on the generalization process. Social Psychology Quarterly 1985, 48(2):178-182.
37. Moore J.C. Status and influence in small group interactions. Sociometery 1968, 31(1):47-63.
38. Parcel T.L., Cook K.S. Status characteristics, reward location, and equity. Sociometry 1977, 40(4):311-324.
39. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37(10):1915-1926.
40. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T., Goldman R. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 41(5):847-855.
41. Raudenbush S., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. second ed.
42. Riches P., Foddy M. Ethnic accent as a status cue. Social Psychology Quarterly 1989, 52(3):197-206.
43. Ridgeway C.L. Nonconformity, competence, and influence in groups: a test of two theories. American Sociological Review 1981, 46(June):333-347.
44. Riordan C. Sex as a general status characteristic. Social Psychology Quarterly 1983, 46(3):261-267.
45. Shelly R.K. How scope and initial conditions determine the growth of theory. The Growth of Social Knowledge: Theory, Simulation, and Empirical Research in Group Processes 2002, 115-130. Praeger, Westport, CT. J. Szmatka, M. Lovaglia, K. Wysienska (Eds.).
46. Shelly R.K., Troyer L. Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined and partially defined groups. Social Psychology Quarterly 2001, 64(4):318-332.
47. Stewart P.A. Women and men in groups: a status characteristics approach to interaction. Status Generalization: New Theory and Research 1988, 69-85. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. M.A. Webster, M. Foschi (Eds.).
48. Stewart P.A., Moore J.C. Wage disparities and performance expectations. Social Psychology Quarterly 1992, 55(1):78-85.
49. Strodtbeck F.L., James R.M., Hawkins C. Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review 1957, 22(6):713-719.
50. Thye S.R., Kalkhoff W. Seeing the forest through the trees: an updated meta-analysis of expectation states research. Current Research in Social Psychology 2009, 15(1):1-14.
51. Troyer L. Effects of protocol differences on the study of status and social influence. Current Research in Social Psychology 2001, 6(13):182-204.
52. Troyer L. The relation between experimental standardization and theoretical development in group processes research. The Growth of Social Knowledge: Theory, Simulation, and Empirical Research in Group Processes 2002, 131-147. Praeger, Westport, CT. J. Szmatka, M. Lovaglia, K. Wysienska (Eds.).
53. Wagner D.G., Berger J. Paths of relevance and the induction of status-task expectancies: a research note. Social Forces 1982, 61(2):575-586.
54. Wagner D.G., Ford R.S., Ford T.W. Can gender inequalities be reduced?. American Sociological Review 1986, 51(1):47-61.
55. Walker H.A., Cohen B.P. Scope statements: imperatives for evaluating theory. American Sociological Review 1985, 50(3):288-301.
56. Webster M., Driskell J. Status generalization: a review and some new data. American Sociological Review 1978, 43(2):220-236.
57. Webster M., Sobiezek B. Sources of Self-Evaluation: A Formal Theory of Significant Others & Social Influence 1974, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
58. Webster Jr., M., 2006. Status research since 2000. In: Report prepared for the Annual Group Processes Conference, Montreal, August 10, 2006.
59. Whitmeyer J.M., Webster M., Slattery Rashotte L. When status equals make status claims. Social Psychology Quarterly 2005, 68(2):179-186.
60. Whitymeyer J.M. The mathematics of expectation states theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 2003, 66(3):238-253.
61. Zelditch M., Lauderdale P., Stublarec S. How are inconsistencies between status and ability resolved?. Social Forces 1980, 58(4):1025-1043.
62. Zimbardo P.G. Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1960, 60(1):86-94.