A new dawn for the naming of fungi: Impacts of decisions made in Melbourne in July 2011 on the future publication and regulation of fungal names

IMA Fungus

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 155-162

  Hawksworth, David L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amsterdam Declaration; Code of Nomenclature; Electronic publication; MycoBank; Nomenclature; Pleomorphic fungi; Registration; Sanctioned names; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856323121     PISSN: 22106340     EISSN: 22106359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.06     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ainsworth GC, Ciferri R (1955) Mycological taxonomic literature and publications. Taxon 4: 3-6
2. Cannon PF, Kirk PM (2000) The philosophies and practicalities of amalgamating anamorph and teleomorph concepts. Studies in Mycology 45: 19-25
3. Chapman AD, Turland NJ, Watson MF (2010) Report of the Special Committee on Electronic Publication. Taxon 59: 1853-1862
4. Demoulin V (2010) Proposals to amend Articles 15, 36 and 45. Taxon 59: 1611-1612
5. Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, Korf RP, Pouzar Z (1981) A solution to the starting point problem in the nomenclature of fungi. Taxon 30: 52-63
6. Gams W (2010) Proposals to require deposition of information concerning typification of names of fungal taxa, with an associated Recommendation. Taxon 59: 1610-1611
7. Gams W, Jaklitsch W, Agerer R, Aguirre-Hudson B, Andersen B, et al. (2011) A critical reponse to the 'Amsterdam Declaration'. Mycotaxon 116: 501-513
8. Greuter W (2009) Registration of names: the botanical experience. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 66: 110-114
9. Greuter W, Garrity G, Hawksworth DL, Jahn R, Kirk PM, et al. (2011) Draft BioCode (2011): principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms. Bionomina 3: 26-44; Taxon 60: 201-212; Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 68: 10-28
10. Hawksworth DL (1995) Steps along the road to a harmonized bionomenclature. Taxon 44: 447-456
11. Hawksworth DL (1997) Orphans in "botanical" diversity. Muelleria 10: 111-123
12. Hawksworth DL, Cooper JA, Crous PW, Hyde KD, Iturriaga T, et al. (2010) Proposals to make the pre-publication deposit of key nomenclatural information in a recognized repository a requirement for valid publication of organisms treated as fungi under the Code. Taxon 59: 660-662; Mycotaxon 111: 514-519
13. Hawksworth DL, Crous PW, Dianese JC, Gryzenhout M, Norvell LL, Seifert KA (2009) Proposals to amend the Code to make it clear that it covers the nomenclature of fungi, and to modify the governance with respect to names of organisms treated as fungi. Taxon 58: 658-659; Mycotaxon 108: 1-4
14. Hawksworth DL, Crous PW, Redhead SA, Reynolds DR, Samson RA, et al. (2011) The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature. IMA Fungus 2: 105-112; Mycotaxon 116: 491-500
15. Hibbett DS, Ohman A, Glotzer D, Nuhn M, Kirk PM, Nilsson RH (2011) Progress in molecular and morphological taxon discovery of Fungi and options for formal classification of environmental sequences. Fungal Biology Reviews 25: 38-47
16. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th edn. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature
17. Knapp S, McNeill J, Turland NJ (2011) Changes to publication requirements made at the XVIII International Botanical Congress in Melbourne-what does e-publication mean for you? Taxon 60: 1498-1501; Mycotaxon 117: in press; MycoKeys 1: 21-28
18. Lumbsch HT, Miller AN, Begerow D, Penev L (2011) MycoKeys, or why we need a new journal in mycology? MycoKeys 1: 1-5
19. McNeill J, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, et al. (eds) (2006) International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. [Regnum Vegetabile no. 146.] Ruggell: A.G. Ganter Verlag
20. McNeill J, Greuter W (1986) Botanical nomenclature. In: Biological Nomenclature Today (Ride WDL, Younés T, eds): 3-25. [IUBS Monograph no. 2.] Eynsham, Oxford: IRL Press
21. McNeill J, Turland NJ (2011) Synopsis of proposals on botanical nomenclature-Melbourne 2011: a review of the proposals concerning the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature submitted to the XVIII International Botanical Congress. Taxon 60: 243-286
22. McNeill J, Turland NJ, Monro A, Lepschi BJ (2011) XVIII International Botanical Congress: preliminary mail vote and report of Congress action on nomenclature proposals. Taxon 60: 1507-1520
23. Michel E, Nikolaeva S, Dale-Skey N, Tracey S (2009) Contributions to the discussion on electronic publication. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 66: 4-19
24. Minter DW (2011) What every botanist and zoologist should know-and what every mycologist should be telling them. IMA Fungus 2: 14-18
25. Morris PL, Macklin JA, Croft J, Nicholson N, Whitehead G (2011) Letter of concern regarding Props. (117-119) to amend the ICBN to require pre-publication deposit of nomenclatural information. Taxon 116: 513-517
26. Nicolson DH (1991) A history of botanical nomenclature. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78: 33-56
27. Norvell LL (2011) Fungal nomenclature. 1. Melbourne approves a new Code. Mycotaxon 116: 481-490
28. Norvell LL, Hawksworth DL, Petersen RH, Redhead SA (2010) IMC9 Edinburgh Nomenclature Sessions. Mycotaxon 113: 503-511; IMA Fungus 1: 143-147; Taxon 59: 1867-1868
29. Perry G (2010) Proposal to amend the wording of Article 7 Example 7. Taxon 59: 1908-1909
30. Redhead SA (2010) Report on the Special Committee on the Nomenclature of Fungi with a Pleomorphic Life Cycle. Taxon 59: 1863-1866
31. Redhead SA, Kirk PM, Keeling PJ, Weiss LM (2009) Proposals to exclude the phylum Microsporidia from the Code. Taxon 58: 669
32. Redhead SA, Norvell LL, Pennycook SR (2010) Proposals to amend articles regulating the typification of names in sanctioning works. Taxon 59: 1911-1913
33. Reynolds DR, Taylor JW (1991) Nucelic acids and nomenclature: name stability under Article 59. In: Improving the Stability of Names: needs and options (Hawksworth DL, ed): 171-177. [Regnum Vegetabile no. 123.] Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books
34. Reynolds DR, Taylor JW (1992) Article 59: reinterpretation or revision? Taxon 41: 91-98
35. Rossman AY, Samuels GJ (2005) Towards a single scientific name for species of fungi. Inoculum 56 (3): 3-6
36. Rossman AY, Seifert KA (2010) Preface: phylogenetic revision of taxonomic concepts in the Hypocreales and other Ascomycota-a tribute to Gary J. Samuels. Studies in Mycology 68: iv-viii
37. Seifert KA (ed) (2003) Has dual nomenclature for fungi run its course? The Article 59 debate. Mycotaxon 88: 493-508
38. Seifert KA, Gams W, Crous PW, Samuels GJ (eds) (2000) Molecules, morphology and classification: towards monophyletic genera in the ascomycetes. Studies in Mycology 45: 1-230
39. Special Committee on Electronic Publication (2010) Proposals to permit electronic publications to be effectively published under specified conditions. Taxon 59: 1907-1908
40. Taylor JW (2011) One Fungus = One Name: DNA and fungal nomenclature twenty years after PCR. IMA Fungus 2: 113-120
41. Weresub LK, Pirozynski KA (1979) Pleomorphism of fungi as treated in the history of mycology and nomenclature. In: The Whole Fungus; the sexual-asexual synthesis (Kendrick B, ed) 1: 17-30. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada