The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature

IMA Fungus

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 105-112

  Hawksworth, David L ^a,b   Crous, Pedro W ^c   Redhead, Scott A ^d   Reynolds, Don R ^e   Samson, Robert A ^c   Seifert, Keith A ^d   Taylor, John W ^f   Wingfield, Michael J ^g   Abaci, Özlem ^h   Aime, Catherine ⁱ   Asan, Ahmet ^j   Bai, Feng Yan ^k   de Beer, Z Wilhelm ^g   Begerow, Dominik ^l   Berikten, Derya ^m   Boekhout, Teun ^c   Buchanan, Peter K ⁿ   Burgess, Treena ^o   Buzina, Walter ^p   Cai, Lei ^k   Cannon, Paul F ^q   Crane, J Leland ^al   Damm, Ulrike ^c   Daniel, Heide Marie ^r   van Diepeningen, Anne D ^c   Druzhinina, Irina ^s   Dyer, Paul S ^t   Eberhardt, Ursula ^c   Fell, Jack W ^u   Frisvad, Jens C ^v   Geiser, David M ^w   Geml, József ^x   Glienke, Chirlei ^y   Gräfenhan, Tom ^z   Groenewald, Johannes Z ^c   Groenewald, Marizeth ^c   de Gruyter, Johannes ^aa   Guého Kellermann, Eveline ^ab   Guo, Liang Dong ^k   Hibbett, David S ^ac   Hong, Seung Beom ^ad   de Hoog, G Sybren ^b   Houbraken, Jos ^c   Huhndorf, Sabine M ^ae   Hyde, Kevin D ^af   Ismail, Ahmed ^c   Johnston, Peter R ⁿ   Kadaifciler, Duygu G ^ag   Kirk, Paul M ^ah   Kõljalg, Urmas ^ai   Kurtzman, Cletus P ^aj   Lagneau, Paul Emile ^ak   Andre Levesque C ^d   Liu, Xingzhong ^k   Lombard, Lorenzo ^c   Meyer, Wieland ^al   Miller, Andrew ^am   Minter, David W ^an,ao   Najafzadeh, Mohammad Javad ^ap   Norvell, Lorelei ^ab   Ozerskaya, Svetlana M ^aq   öziç, Rasime ^m   Pennycook, Shaun R ⁿ   Peterson, Stephen W ^aj   Pettersson, Olga V ^ar   Quaedvlieg, William ^c   Robert, Vincent A ^c   Ruibal, Constantino ^b   Schnürer, Johan ^ar   Schroers, Hans Josef ^as   Shivas, Roger ^at   Slippers, Bernard ^g   Spierenburg, Henk ^c   Takashima, Masako ^au   Taskin, Evrim ^av   Thines, Marco ^aw,ax   Thrane, Ulf ^v   Uztan, Alev Haliki ^h   van Raak, Marcel ^aa   Varga, János ^ay   Vasco, Aida ^az   Verkley, Gerard ^c   Videira, Sandra I R ^c   de Vries, Ronald P ^c   Weir, Bevan S ⁿ   Yilmaz, Neriman ^c   Yurkov, Andrey ^l   Zhang, Ning ^ba   more..

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c CBS KNAW FUNGAL BIODIVERSITY CENTRE   (Netherlands)

^d AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^h EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

ⁱ LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j TRAKYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^k INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY   (China)

^l RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^m ANADOLU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

ⁿ LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^o MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^p MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^q JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^r UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^s VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^t UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^u UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^v TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^w PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^x LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^y FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^z GRAIN RESEARCH LABORATORY   (Canada)

^aa WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^ab Clark University ^*  (United States)

^ac CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ad National Academy of Agricultural Science   (South Korea)

^ae FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^af CABI Europe ^*  (Thailand)

^ag ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^ah CABI   (United Kingdom)

^ai UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^aj NATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH   (United States)

^ak Regional Association for Health and Animal Identification   (Belgium)

^al UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^am UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^an Cybertruffle   (United Kingdom)

^ao CAB InternationaI   (United Kingdom)

^ap MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^aq SKRYABIN INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF MICROORGANISMS   (Russian Federation)

^ar SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^as AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE OF SLOVENIA   (Slovenia)

^at DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION   (Australia)

^au RIKEN BIORESOURCE CENTER   (Japan)

^av CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^aw BIODIVERSITY AND CLIMATE RESEARCH CENTRE BIK F   (Germany)

^ax GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^ay UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^az UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

^ba RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Anamorph; Article 59; BioCode; Candidate species; Environmental sequences; International Code of Botanical Nomenclature; MycoCode; Pleomorphic fungi; Teleomorph

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955343788     PISSN: 22106340     EISSN: 22106359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Gams W (2005) Towards a single scientific name for species of fungi: a rebuttal. Inoculum 56(6): 1-5
2. Gams W, Jaklitsch W, Kirschner R (2010) Proposals to modify Article 59 in order to harmonize it with present practice. Taxon 59: 1929-1930
3. Greuter W, Garrity G, Hawksworth DL, Jahn R, Kirk PM, Knapp S, McNeill J, Michel E, Patterson DJ, Pyle R, Tindall BJ (2011) Draft BioCode (2011): principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms. Bionomina 1: in press; Taxon 60: 201-212; Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 68: 10-28
4. Hawksworth DL (2005) Limitation of dual nomenclature for pleomorphic fungi. Taxon 53: 596-598
5. Hawksworth DL (2007) Mycologists speak on nomenclatural issues. Mycological Research 111: 1363-1364
6. Hawksworth DL, Crous PW, Dianese JC, Gryzenhout M, Norvell LL, Seifert KA (2009) Proposals to amend the Code to make it clear that it covers the nomenclature of fungi, and to modify the governance with respect to names of organisms treated as fungi. Taxon 58: 658-659; Mycotaxon 108: 1-4
7. Hawksworth DL, Cooper JA, Crous PW, Hyde KD, Iturriaga T, Kirk PM, Lumbsch HT, May TW, Minter DW, Misra JK, Norvell L, Redhead SA, Rossman AY, Seifert KA, Stalpers JA, Taylor JW, Wingfield MJ (2010) Proposals to make the pre-publication deposit of key nomenclatural information in a recognized repository a requirement for valid publication of organisms treated as fungi under the Code. Taxon 59: 660-662; Mycotaxon 111: 514-519
8. Hawksworth DL, Sutton BC (1974) Comments on Weresub, Malloch and Pirozynski's proposal for Article 59. Taxon 23: 659-661
9. Hibbett DS, Ohman A, Glotzer D, Nuhn M, Kirk PM, Nilsson RH (2011) Progress in molecular and morphological taxon discovery in fungi and options for formal classification of environmental sequences. Fungal Biology Reviews 25: 38-47
10. Jezbera J, Sharma AK, Brandt U, Doolittle WF, Hahn MW (2009) 'Candidatus Planktophila limnetica', an actinobacterium representying one of the most numerically important taxa in freshwater bacterioplankton. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 59: 2864-2869
11. McNeill J, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, Marhold K, Nicolson DH, Prado J, Silva PC, Skog J, Wiersema J, Turland N (eds) (2006) International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, 2005. [Regnum Vegetabile Vol. 146.] Pp. xviii + 568. Ruggell: A. R. G. Ganter Verlag
12. McNeill J, Turland NJ (2011) Synopsis of Proposals on botanical nomenclature-Melbourne 2011: a review of the proposals concerning the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature submitted to the XVIII International Botanical Congress. Taxon 60: 243-286
13. Murray RGE, Stackebrandt E (1995) Taxonomic note: implementation of the provisional status Candidatus for incompletely described procaryotes. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 45: 186-187
14. Norvell LL (2011) Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 17. Taxon 60: 610-613
15. Norvell LL, Hawksworth DL, Petersen RH, Redhead SA (2010) IMC9 Edinburgh Nomenclature Sessions. Mycotaxon 113: 503-511; IMA Fungus 1: 143-147; Taxon 59: 1867-1868
16. Ozerskaya SM, Kochkina GA, Ivanushkina NE (2010) Fungal diversity in GenBank: problems and possible solutions. Inoculum 61(4): 1-4
17. Redhead SA (2010a) Report on the Special Committee on the Nomenclature of Fungi with a Pleomorphic Life Cycle. Taxon 59: 1863-1866
18. Redhead SA (2010b) Proposals to define the new term 'teleotype', to rename Chapter VI, and to modify Article 59 to limit dual nomenclature and to remove conflicting examples and recommendations. Taxon 59: 1927-1929
19. Reynolds DR, Taylor JW (1991) Nucleic acids and nomenclature: name stability under Article 59. Regnum Vegetabile 123: 171-177
20. Reynolds DR, Taylor JW (1992) Article 59: reinterpretation or revision? Taxon 41: 91-98
21. Reynolds DR, Taylor JW (eds) (1993) The Fungal Holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. Wallingford: CAB International
22. Rossman AY, Samuels GJ (2005) Towards a single scientific name for species of fungi. Inoculum 56(3): 3-6
23. Rossman AY, Seifert KA (eds) (2011) Phylogenetic revision of taxonomic concepts in the Hypocreales and other Ascomycota-a tribute to Gary J. Samuels. Studies in Mycology 68: 1-256
24. Seifert KA (ed) (2003) Has dual nomenclature for fungi run its course? The Article 59 debate. Mycotaxon 88: 493-508
25. Seifert KA, Gams W, Crous PW, Samuels GL (eds) (2000) Molecules, morphology and classification: towards monophyletic genera in the ascomycetes. Studies in Mycology 45: 1-230
26. Van Warmelo KT (1979) Proposals for modification of the Code of Botanical Nomenclature: IMC2 proposals. Taxon 28: 424-431
27. Weresub LK, Pirozynski KA (1979) Pleomorphism of fungi as treated in the history of mycology and nomenclature. In: The Whole Fungus: the sexual-asexual synthesis (B Kendrick, ed) 1: 17-30. Ottawa: National Museum of Natural Sciences