A Critical Response to The 'Amsterdam Declaration'

Mycotaxon

Volumn 116, Issue , 2011, Pages 501-512

  Gams, Walter ^a   Jaklitsch, Walter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Anamorph teleomorph connection; Dual nomenclature; Precedence of teleomorph name; Registration in databases

Indexed keywords

ASCOMYCOTA; AYTHYA AMERICANA; BASIDIOMYCOTA; FUNGI;

EID: 80052946735     PISSN: 00934666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5248/116.501     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Druzhinina IS, Kubicek CP, Komon-Zelazowska M, Mulaw TB, Bissett J. 2010. The Trichoderma harzianum demon: complex speciation history resulting in coexistence of hypothetical biological species, recent agamospecies and numerous relict lineages. BMC Evol. Biol. 10: 94-106. doi: 10.1186/1471.2148.10.94.
2. Hawksworth DL. 2004, Fungal diversity and its implications for genetic resource collections. Stud. Mycol. 50: 9-18.
3. Hawksworth DL, Crous PW. Redhead SA, Reynolds DR, Samson RA, Seifert KA, Taylor JW, Wingfield MJ and 80 others. 2010. The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature. IMA Fungus 2: 105-112, 2011. doi:10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14.
4. Lombard L, Crous PW, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 2010. Species concepts in Calonectria (Cylindrocladium) Stud. Mycol. 66: 1-13.
5. - Multigene phylogeny and mating tests reveal three cryptic species related to Calonectria pauciramosa. ibid. 15-30.- Phylogeny and systematics of the genus Calonectria. ibid. 31-69. doi:10.3114/sim.2010.66.01 - 10.3114/sim.2010.66.02 - 10.3114/sim.2010.66.03.
6. McNeill J, Turland N. 2011. Synopsis of Proposals on Botanical Nomenclature - Melbourne 2011: A review of the proposals concerning the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature submitted to the XVIII International Botanical Congress. Taxon 60: 243-286.
7. Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH. 2008. Intraspecific ITS Variability in the Kingdom Fungi as Expressed in the International Sequence Databases and Its Implications for Molecular Species Identification Evolutionary Bioinformatics 4: 193-201.
8. Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson KH, Kõljalg U. 2006. Taxonomic Reliability of DNA Sequences in Public Sequence Databases: A Fungal Perspective. PLoS ONE 1(1): e59. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0000059.
9. Norvell LL, Hawksworth DL, Petersen RH, Redhead SA. 2010. IMC9 Edinburgh Nomenclature Sessions. IMA Fungus 1: 143-147. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2010.01.02. 05 - Also in Mycotaxon 113: 503-511, doi: 10.5248/113.503 & Taxon 59: 1867-1868.
10. Ozerskaya SM, Kochkina GA, Ivanushkina NE. 2010. Fungal diversity in GenBank: problems and possible solutions. Inoculum 61(4): 1-4, 2010.
11. Redhead S. 2010. (294-306) Proposals to define the new term 'teleotype', to rename Chapter VI, and to modify Article 59 to limit dual nomenclature and to remove conflicting examples and recommendations. Taxon 59: 1927-1929.
12. Wheeler QD. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, 359: 571-583. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1452 (Pubitemid 38504151)