A simulation-based analysis of transition pathways for the Dutch electricity system

Energy Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2012, Pages 557-568

  Yücel, Gönenç ^a,b   van Daalen, Cornelia ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Agent based simulation; Energy policy; Scenario analysis

Indexed keywords

AGENT BASED SIMULATION; AGENT-BASED SIMULATION MODELS; CARBON BUDGETS; CARBON EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY SYSTEM; EMISSION LEVEL; END USERS; ENERGY SOURCE; FUEL MIX; GREEN ELECTRICITY; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS; SIMULATION-BASED ANALYSIS; TRANSITION PATHWAY;

CARBON; COMPETITION; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY POLICY; EXPERIMENTS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; INVESTMENTS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

CARBON EMISSION; COMPETITIVENESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY POLICY; FOSSIL FUEL; NATURAL GAS;

EID: 84856294733     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.024     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arkesteijn K. The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: an empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy 2005, 33(2):183-196.
2. Barker T. The effects on competitiveness of coordinated versus unilateral fiscal policies reducing GHG emissions in the EU: an assessment of a 10% reduction by 2010 using the E3ME model. Energy Policy 1998, 26(14):1083-1098.
3. Barlas Y. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 1996, 12(3):183-210.
4. Ben-Akiva M.E., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, MIT Press.
5. Benders, R.M.J., 1996. Interactive Simulation of Electricity Demand and Production. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Groningen.
6. Breeze P.A. Power Generation Technologies 2005, Newnes, Oxford.
7. CBS, 2011. CBS Statline Database. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=00377&D1=1-3&D2=346&VW=T.
8. Caputo A.C., Palumbo M., Pelagagge P.M., Scacchia F. Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass and Bioenergy 2005, 28(1):35-51.
9. 2 emission-trading on power generation emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2009, 76(3):358-370.
10. Chappin, Emile J.L., 2011. Simulating Energy Transitions. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University of Technology.
11. 2 emissions trading for short-run electricity market outcomes in northwest Europe. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2008, 34(3):251-281.
12. Committee on Climate Change, 2011. Meeting Carbon Budgets-3rd Progress Report to Parliament, London.
13. 2 capture and storage: a case study for the Netherlands. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3(2):217-236.
14. 2 capture and storage. Part A: review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2006, 32(2):215-246.
15. 2. Energy 2007, 32(7):1163-1176.
16. de Vries B., Dijk D. Electric power generation options for the Netherlands to 2000. Energy Policy 1985, 13(3):230-242.
17. Ellerman, A.D., Joskow, P.L., 2008. The European Union's Emissions Trading System in Perspective. MIT CEEPR Report No. 08-013.
18. Ford A. Cycles in competitive electricity markets: a simulation study of the western United States. Energy Policy 1999, 27(11):637-658.
19. Ford A. Waiting for the boom: a simulation study of power plant construction in California. Energy Policy 2001, 29(11):847-869.
20. Gensch D.H., Recker W.W. The multinomial, multiattribute logit choice model. Journal of Marketing Research 1979, 16(1):124-132.
21. Keeney R.L., Raïffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs 1993, Cambridge University Press.
22. Lako, P. (2004). Coal-fired Power Technologies: Coal-fired Power Options on the Brink of Climate Policies. ECN Report No. ECN-C-04-076.
23. Lise W., Linderhof V., Kuik O., Kemfert C., Ostling R., Heinzow T. A game theoretic model of the Northwestern European electricity market-market power and the environment. Energy Policy 2006, 34(15):2123-2136.
24. Lise W., Sijm J., Hobbs B.F. The impact of the EU ETS on prices, profits and emissions in the power sector: simulation results with the COMPETES EU20 model. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 47(1):23-44.
25. Özdemir, Ö., Scheepers, M., Seebregts, A., 2008. Future Electricity Prices: Wholesale Market Prices in and Exchanges Between Northwest European Electricity Markets. ECN Report No. ECN-E-08-044.
26. Rödel, J.G., 2008. Ecology, Economy and Security of Supply of the Dutch Electricity Supply System: A Scenario Based Future Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University of Technology.
27. Seebregts, A., 2005. Appendix B. POWERS Model. ECN Report No. ECN-C-05-094.
28. Seebregts A., Groenenberg H. How may CCS technology affect the electricity market in North-Western Europe?. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):4181-4191.
29. SenterNovem, 2011a. Milieukwaliteit van de Elektriciteitsproductie (MEP). Retrieved November 1, 2011, from: http://www.agentschapnl.nl/programmas-regelingen/milieukwaliteit-van-de-elektriciteitsproductie-mep.
30. SenterNovem, 2011b. Energie Investeringsaftrek (EIA). Retrieved November 1, 2011, from: http://www.agentschapnl.nl/nl/programmas-regelingen/energie-investeringsaftrek-eia.
31. SenterNovem, 2011c. Stimulering Duurzame Energieproductie (SDE). Retrieved November 1, 2011, from: http://www.agentschapnl.nl/nl/programmas-regelingen/stimulering-duurzame-energieproductie-sde.
32. Sterman J.D. Modeling the formation of expectations: the history of energy demand forecast. International Journal of Forecasting 1988, 4:243-259.
33. TenneT, 2009. Quality and Capacity Plan 2010-2016.
34. TenneT, 2011. Actual Load Data. Retrieved November 1, 2011, from: http://energieinfo.tennet.org/dataexport/exporteerdatacountry.aspx.
35. Uyterlinde M., Junginger M., Devries H., Faaij A., Turkenburg W. Implications of technological learning on the prospects for renewable energy technologies in Europe. Energy Policy 2007, 35(8):4072-4087.
36. van den Broek M., Faaij A., Turkenburg Wim. Planning for an electricity sector with carbon capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(1):105-129.
37. 2 in the Utsira formation as part of a long term Dutch CCS strategy. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4(2):351-366.
38. Ventosa M., Baillo L., Ramos A., Rivier M. Electricity market modeling trends. Energy Policy 2005, 33(7):897-913.
39. van Vliet O., van den Broek M., Turkenburg Wim, Faaij A. Combining hybrid cars and synthetic fuels with electricity generation and carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 2011, 39(1):248-268.
40. World Bank, 2011. Prospects-Commodity Markets. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from: http://econ.worldbank.org/.
41. Yücel, G., 2010. Analyzing Transition Dynamics. The Actor-Option Framework for Modelling Socio-Technical Systems. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University of Technology.
42. Yücel G., van Daalen C.E. An objective-based perspective on assessment of model-supported policy processes. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2009, 12(4):3.