The effects on competitiveness of coordinated versus unilateral fiscal policies reducing GHG emissions in the EU: An assessment of a 10% reduction by 2010 using the E3ME model

Energy Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 14, 1998, Pages 1083-1098

  Barker, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GREENHOUSE GASES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAS EMISSIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; TAXATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL;

CARBON EMISSION; EMISSION CONTROL; EUROPEAN UNION; FISCAL POLICY; MODEL;

EUROPE;

EID: 0032419481     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00053-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, J (1997) 'Environmental policy and competitiveness in a globalised economy: conceptual issues and a review of the empirical evidence. In Globalisation and Environment: Preliminary Perspectives, OECD, Paris (forthcoming).
2. Barker T S International trade and economic growth. an alternative to the neo-classical approach Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1:1977;153-172.
3. Barker T S, Peterson A W A The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model of the British Economy. 1987;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Barker T, Lewney R 'A green scenario for the UK economy'. Barker T Green Futures for Economic Growth. 1991;11-38 Cambridge Econometrics, Cambridge, UK.
5. Barker, T S, Ekins P & Johnstone, N (1995) Global Warming and Energy Demand. Routledge, London.
6. Barker, T & Gardiner, B (1996), 'Employment, wage formation and pricing in the European Union: empirical modelling of environmental tax reform'. In Carraro C & Siniscalco, D. (eds), Environmental Fiscal Reform and Unemployment. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
7. Barker T, Dieppe A, Gardiner B E3ME Users' Manual. 1996;Cambridge Econometrics, UK.
8. Barker T, Johnstone N 'International competitiveness and carbon taxation'. Barker, Köhler International Competitiveness and Environmental Policies. 1998;71-127 Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
9. Barker T, Köhler J International Competitiveness and Environmental Policies. 1998;Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK ISBN 1 85898 778 4.
10. Boltho A The assessment. international competitiveness Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 12(3):1996;1-16.
11. Cappelen, Å (1991) MODAG A Medium Term Macroeconometric Model of the Norwegian Economy, Discussion Paper No. 67, Oslo: Central Bureau of Statistics.
12. 2 target for the EU: results from the GEM-E3 model. Report from the National Technical University of Athens.
13. 2 policy in the EU - an applied general equilibrium analysis. 1997;Mannheim University and ZEW Mannheim.
14. 2 Emissions in European Economy. No. 51, Brussels.
15. Commission of the European Communities (ed.) 1993) HERMES: Harmonised Econometric Research for Modelling Economic Systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
16. 2 Emission. Final Report prepared for the CEC, November.
17. 2 Emissions on European Industry.
18. DRI and others (1994) Potential Benefits of Integration of Environmental and Economic Policies. Report prepared for the European Commission, DG XI, Graham and Trotman and Kluwer.
19. Ekins P 'On the dividends from environmental taxation'. O'Riordan T Ecotaxation. 1997;Earthscan, London.
20. Ekins P, Speck S The impacts of environmental policy on competitiveness. theory and evidence' Barker, Köhler International Competitiveness and Environmental Policies. 1998;37-70 Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
21. Engle R F, Granger C W J Cointegration and error correction. representation, estimation and testing Econometrica. 55:1991;251-276.
22. Engle R F, Granger C W J Long-Run Economic Relation-ships (Readings in Cointegration). 1991;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
23. European Environmental Agency (1996) Environmental Taxes: Implementation and Environmental Effectiveness. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communitites.
24. EFILWC (1996) Environmental Taxes and Charges: NATIONAL Experiences and Plans. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions and Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
25. Fisher, J & Grubb, M (1997) The Use of Economic Models in Climate Policy Analysis. Climate Change Briefing Paper No. 5, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.
26. Hendry D F, Pagan A, Sargan J D 'Dynamic specification'. Griliches Z, Intriligator M D Handbook of Econometrics. II:1984;North-Holland, Amsterdam.
27. 2 emissions in Europe: individual stabilisation versus harmonization of carbon taxes, FEEM, Nota di Lavoro 8.93; Carraro, C & Siniscalco, D (1993) The Carbon Tax: an Economic Assessment. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
28. Ikwue T, Skea J Business and the genesis of the European Community carbon tax proposal. Business Strategy and the Environment. 3(2):1994;110.
29. Johansson O, Schipper L Measuring the long-run fuel demand of cars. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. XXXI(3):1997;277-292.
30. OECD Technology and the Economy. The Key Relationships:1992;OECD, Paris.
31. OECD Climate Change, Economic Instruments and Income Distribution. 1995;OECD, Paris.
32. Repetto R., Austin D The Costs of Climate Change Protection. A Guide for the Perplexed:1997;World Resources Institute, Washington.
33. 2 Emissions, pp. 241-268.
34. Sprenger R-U Environmental policy and international competitiveness. the case of Germany Barker, Köhler International Competitiveness and Environmental Policies. 1998;197-237 Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
35. Welsch H The carbon-tax game. differential tax recycling in a two-region general equilibrium model of the European Community Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 132(2):1996;356-377.