Identification of structural Interventions for HIV/AIDS Prevention: The Concept Mapping Exercise

Public Health Reports

Volumn 126, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 777-778

  Abdul Quader, Abu S ^a,b   Collins, Charles ^a  

^a CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; DRUG ABUSE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION PREVENTION; INFECTION RISK; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SMOKING CESSATION; VIOLENCE; CONCEPT FORMATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROMOTION; INCIDENCE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); CONCEPT FORMATION; HEALTH PLANNING; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856294211     PISSN: 00333549     EISSN: 14682877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003335491112600603     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. UNAIDS/World Health Organization. Global summary of the AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2009.
2. Hall HI, Song R, Rhodes P, Prejean J, An Q, Lee LM, et al. Estima-tion of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA 2008;300:520-9.
3. Lyles CM, Kay LS, Crepaz N, Herbst JH, Passin WF, Kim AS, etal.Best-evidence interventions: findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000-2004. Am J Public Health 2007;97:133-43.
4. Frieden TR. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health 2010;100:590-5.
5. Poundstone KE, Strathee SA, Celentano DD. The social epidemiol-ogy of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Epidemiol Rev 2004;26:22-35.
6. Blankenship KM, Friedman SR, Dworkin S, Mantell JE. Structuralinterventions: concepts, challenges and opportunities for research. J Urban Health 2006;83:59-72.
7. Sumartojo E. Structural factors in HIV prevention: concepts,examples, and implications for research. AIDS 2000;14 Suppl 1:S3-10.
8. Rhodes T, Mikhailova L, Sarang A, Lowndes CM, Rylkov A, Khutor-skoy M, et al. Situational factors influencing drug injecting, risk reduction and syringe exchange in Togliatti City, Russian Federa-tion: a qualitative study of micro risk environment. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:39-54.
9. Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:1026-44.
10. Aidala A, Cross JE, Stall R, Harre D, Sumartojo E. Housing status and HIV risk behaviors: implications for prevention and policy. AIDS Behav 2005;9:251-65.
11. Riley ED, Moore KL, Haber S, Neilands TB, Cohen J, Kral AH.Population-level effects of uninterrupted health insurance on service use among HIV-positive unstably housed adults. AIDS Care 2011;23:822-30.
12. Kohler HP, Thornton R. Conditional cash transfers and HIV/AIDS prevention: unconditionally promising? Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; September 2010.
13. Tawil O, Verster A, O'Reilly KR. Enabling approaches for HIV/AIDS prevention: can we modify the environment and minimize the risk? AIDS 1995;9:1299-306.
14. Gupta GR, Parkhurst JO, Ogden JA, Aggleton P, Mahal A. Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet 2008;372:764-75.
15. Sweat MD, Denison JA. Reducing HIV incidence in developing countries with structural and environmental interventions. AIDS 1995;9 Suppl A:S251-7
16. Copenhaver MM, Fisher JD. Experts outline ways to decrease the decade-long yearly rate of 40,000 new HIV infections in the US. AIDS Behav 2006;10:105-14.
17. Trochim WM, Linton R. Conceptualization for planning and evalu-ation. Eval Program Plann 1986;9:289-308.
18. Trochim WMK. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 1989;1:1-16.
19. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ. Advances in mixed-method evaluation:the challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms: new directions for evaluations, no. 74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997.
20. Trochim WM, Milstein B, Wood BJ, Jackson S, Pressler V. Setting objectives for community and systems change: an application of concept mapping for planning a statewide health improvement initiative. Health Promot Pract 2004;5:8-19.
21. McLinden DJ, Trochim WMK. Getting to parallel: assessing the return on expectations of training. Perfomance Improvement 1998;37:21-6.
22. Shern DL, Trochim WMK, LaComb CA. The use of concept map-ping for assessing fidelity of model transfer: an example from pysychiatric rehabilitation. Eval Program Plan 1995;18:143-53.
23. Trochim WMK. Concept mapping: soft science or hard art? Eval Program Plan 1989b;12(Special Issue):87-110.
24. Trochim WMK, Cook JA, Setze RJ. Using concept mapping to develop a conceptual framework of staff's views of a supported employment program for individuals with severe mental illness. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62:766-75.
25. Witkin BR, Trochim WMK. Toward a synthesis of listening constructs:a concept map analysis of the construct of listening. Int J Listening 1997;11:69-87.
26. Concept Systems, Inc. Concept Systems: Version 1.75. Ithaca (NY): Concept Systems, Inc.; 2002.