Novel plant communities limit the effects of a managed flood to restore riparian forests along a large regulated river

River Research and Applications

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 204-215

  Cooper, D J ^a   Andersen, D C ^b  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^b FORT COLLINS SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cottonwood; Demography; Environmental flows; Fluvial landforms; Managed flood; Populus; Regulated river; Riparian vegetation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; FLOOD; HABITAT RESTORATION; LANDFORM; PLANT COMMUNITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIPARIAN FOREST; RIPARIAN VEGETATION;

GREEN RIVER; UNITED STATES;

POPULUS; POPULUS FREMONTII;

EID: 84856238166     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1452     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Acreman MC, Farquharson FAK, McCartney MP, Sullivan C, Campbell K, Hodgson N, Morton J, Smith D, Birley M, Knott D, Lazenby J, Barbier EB.2000. Managed flood releases from reservoirs: issues and guidance. Report to DFID and the World Commission on Dams. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
2. Acreman M.2003. Managed flood releases from reservoirs. Geophysical Research Abstracts5:09487.
3. Adair EC, Binkley D.2002. Co-limitation of first year Fremont cottonwood seedlings by nitrogen and water. Wetlands22:425-44420.
4. Andersen DC.2005. Characterizing the flow regimes for floodplain forest conservation: an assessment of factors affecting sapling growth and survivorship on three cold desert rivers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research35:2886-2899.
5. Andersen DC, Cooper DJ.2000. Plant-herbivore-hydroperiod interactions: effects of native mammals on floodplain tree recruitment. Ecological Applications10:1384-1399.
6. Andersen DC, Cooper DJ, Northcott K.2007. Dams, floodplain land use, and riparian forest conservation in the semiarid upper Colorado River basin, USA. Environmental Management40:453-475.
7. Antheunisse AM, Loeb R, Lamers L, Verhoeven J.2006. Regional differences in nutrient limitation in floodplains of selected European rivers: implications for rehabilitation of characteristic floodplain vegetation. River Research and Applications22:1039-1055.
8. Arthington A, Bunn S, Poff L, Naiman R.2006. Flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications16:1311-1318.
9. Auble GT, Scott M, Friedman J.2005. Use of individualistic streamflow-vegetation relations along the Fremont River, Utah, USA to assess impacts of flow alteration on wetland and riparian areas. Wetlands25:143-154.
10. Baker BW, Ducharme H, Mitchell D, Stanley T, Peinetti H.2005. Interaction of beaver and elk herbivory reduces standing crop of willow. Ecological Applications15:110-118.
11. Bendix J.1999. Stream power influence on southern Californian riparian vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science10:243-252.
12. Bendix J, Hupp C.2000. Hydrological and geomorphological impacts on riparian plant communities. Hydrological Processes14:2977-2990.
13. Bornette G, Tabacchi E, Hupp C, Puijalon S, Rostan J.2008.A model of plant strategies in fluvial hydrosystems. Freshwater Biology53:1692-1705.
14. Breck SW, Wilson KR, Andersen DC.2003. Beaver herbivory and its effect on cottonwood trees: influence of flooding along matched regulated and unregulated rivers. River Research and Applications19:43-58.
15. Collier M, Webb R, Schmidt J.1996. Dams and rivers: a primer on the downstream effects of dams. US Department of Interior, US Geological Survey. Circular 1126. 93 p.
16. Cooper DJ, Andersen DC, Chimner RA.2003. Multiple pathways for woody plant establishment on floodplains at local to regional scales. Journal of Ecology91:182-196.
17. Cooper DJ, Merritt D, Andersen DC, Chimner RA.1999. Factors controlling Fremont cottonwood seedling establishment on the upper Green River, Colorado and Utah. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management15:419-440.
18. Dynesius M, Nilsson C.1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river sy stems in the northern third of the world. Science266:753-762.
19. Eckenwalder JE.1977. North American cottonwoods (Populus, Salicaceae) of sections Abaso and Aigeiros. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum58:193-208.
20. Friedman JM, Auble G.1999. Mortality of riparian box elder from sediment mobilization and extended inundation. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management15:463-476.
21. Friedman JM, Lee V.2002. Extreme floods, channel change, and riparian forests along ephemeral streams. Ecological Monographs72:409-425.
22. Fausch KD, Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW.2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience52:483-498.
23. Gee GW, Bauder JW.1986. Particle size analysis. InMethods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn, Klute A (ed.). American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI;383-411.
24. Graf WL.1985. The Colorado River, Instability and Basin Management. Association of American Geographers: Washington, D.C; p.86.
25. Grams P, Schmidt JC.2005. Equilibrium or indeterminate? Where sediment budgets fail: sediment mass balance and adjustment of channel form, Green River downstream from Flaming Gorge Dam, Utah and Colorado. Geomorphology71:156-181.
26. Hoffnagle TL, Valdez TA, Speas DW.1999. Fish abundance, distribution and habitat use. American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph110:273-287.
27. Hughes FMR, Rood SB.2003. Allocation of river flows for restoration of floodplain forest ecosystems: a review of approaches and their applicability in Europe. Environmental Management32:12-33.
28. Hughes FMR, Colston A, Mountford JO.2005. Restoring riparian ecosystems: the challenge of accommodating variability and designing restoration trajectories. Ecology and Society10: (accessed 2 August 2010).
29. Jansson R, Backx H, Dixon A, Dudgeon D, Hughes FMR, Nakamura K, Stanley EH, Tockner K.2005a. Stating mechanisms and refining criteria for ecologically meaningful successful river restoration: a comment on Palmer et al. 2005. Journal of Applied Ecology39:971-986.
30. Jansson R, Zinko U, Merritt D, Nilsson C.2005b. Hydrochory increases riparian plant species richness: a comparison between a free-flowing and a regulated river. Journal of Ecology93:1094-1103.
31. Johnson WC.1994. Woodland expansion in the Platte River, Nebraska: patterns and causes. Ecological Monographs64:45-84.
32. Johnson WC.2002. Riparian vegetation diversity along regulated rivers: contribution of novel and relict habitats. Freshwater Biology47:749-760.
33. Kearsley M, Ayers T.1999. Riparian vegetation responses: snatching defeat from the jaws of victory and vice versa. American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph110:309-327.
34. Levine CM, Stromberg JC.2001. Effects of flooding on native and exotic plant seedlings: implications for restoring south-western riparian forests by manipulating water and sediment flows. Journal of Arid Environments49:111-131.
35. Lite SJ, Stromberg JC.2005. Surface water and ground-water thresholds for maintaining Populus-Salix forests, San Pedro River, Arizona. Biological Conservation125:153-167.
36. Michener WK, Haeuber R.1998. Flooding: natural and managed disturbances. BioScience48:677-680.
37. Merritt DM, Cooper DJ.2000. Riparian vegetation and channel change in response to river regulation: a comparative study of regulated and unregulated streams in the Green River basin, U.S.A. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management16:543-564.
38. Merritt DM, Scott ML, Poff NL, Auble GT, Lytle DA.2010. Theory, methods and tools for determining environmental flows for riparian vegetation: riparian vegetation-flow response guilds. Freshwater Biology55:206-225.
39. McCully P.1996. Silenced Rivers: The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams. Zed books: London; p.350.
40. Muth R, Crist L, LaGory K, Hayse J, Bestgen K, Lyons J, Ryan T, Valdez R.1993. Flow recommendations for endangered fishes in the Green River downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam. Upper Colorado River Recovery Program. Project FG-53. US Dept. of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, CO.
41. Opperman J, Merenlender A.2000. Deer herbivory as an ecological constraint to restoration of degraded riparian corridors. Restoration Ecology5:43-455.
42. Patten DT.1998. Riparian ecosystems of semi-arid North America: diversity and human impacts. Wetlands18:498-512.
43. Patten DT, Stevens L.2001. Restoration of the Colorado River Ecosystem using planned floods. Ecological Applications11:633-634.
44. Petts GE.1984. Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management. Wiley: Chichester, UK; p.285.
45. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr J, Prestegaard K, Richter B, Sparks R, Stromberg J.1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience47:769-784.
46. Poff NL, Allan JD, Palmer M, Hart D, Richter B, Arthington A, Rogers K, Meyer J, Stanford J.2003. River flows and water wars? Emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment1:298-306.
47. Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O'keeffe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A.2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology55:147-170.
48. Postel S, Carpenter S.1997. Freshwater ecosystem services, InNature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, GC Daily (ed.). Island Press: Washington, DC;195-214.
49. Palmer MA, Bernhardt E. and many others., 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology42:208-217.
50. Reily TW, Johnson W.1982. The effects of altered hydrologic regime on tree growth along the Missouri River in North Dakota. Canadian Journal of Botany60:2410-2423.
51. Richter BD, Richter H.2000. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers. Conservation Biology14:1467-1478.
52. Richter BD. in press. Re-Thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries. River Research and Applications. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1320.
53. Rood SB, Gourley C, Ammon E, Heki L, Klotz J, Morrison M, Mosley D, Scoppettone G, Swanson S, Wagner P.2003. Flows for floodplain forests: successful riparian restoration along the lower Truckee River, Nevada, USA. BioScience53:647-656.
54. Rood SB, Heinze-Milne S.1989. Abrupt downstream forest decline following river damming in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany67:1744-1749.
55. Rood SB, Mahoney J.1990. Collapse of riparian poplar forests downstream from dams in western prairies: probably causes and prospects for mitigation. Environmental Management14:451-464.
56. Rood SB, Mahoney J.2000. Revised instream flow regulation enables cottonwood recruitment along the St. Mary River, Alberta, Canada. Rivers7:109-125.
57. Rood SB, Mahoney J, Reid D, Zilm L.1995. Instream flow and the decline of riparian cottonwoods along the St. Mary River, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany73:1250-1260.
58. Rood SB, Patino S, Coombs K, Tyree M.2000. Branch sacrifice: cavitation-associated drought adaptation of riparian cottonwoods. Trees14:248-257.
59. Rood SB, Samuelson GM, Braatne JH, Gourley CR, Hughes FMR, Mahoney JM.2005. Managing river flows to restore floodplain forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment3:193-201.
60. Schmidt JC, Parnell R, Grams P. and many others., 2001. The 1996 controlled flood in Grand Canyon: flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change. Ecological Applications11:657-671.
61. Schmidt J, Webb R, Valdez R, Marzolf R, Stevens L.1998. Science and values in river restoration in the Grand Canyon. BioScience48:735-747.
62. Scott ML, Friedman JM, Auble GT.1996. Fluvial processes and the establishment of bottomland trees. Geomorphology14:327-339.
63. Seastedt TR, Hobbs R, Suding K.2008. Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment6:547-553.
64. Shafroth PB, Wilcox AC, Lytle DA, Hickey JT, Andersen DC, Beauchamp VB, Hautzinger A, McMullen LE, Warner A.2010. Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river. Freshwater Biology55:68-85.
65. Stevens LE, Schmidt JC, Ayers TJ, Brown BT.1995. Fluvial marsh development along the dam-regulated Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. Ecological Applications5:1025-1039.
66. Stevens LE, Ayers T, many others.2001. Planned flooding and Colorado River riparian tradeoffs downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. Ecological Applications11:701-710.
67. Stromberg JC, Patten D.1990. Riparian vegetation instream flow requirements: a case study from a diverted stream in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Environmental Management14:185-194.
68. Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR.2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution19:46-53.
69. Taylor JP, Wester DB, Smith LM.1999. Soil disturbance, flood management, and riparian woody plant establishment in the Rio Grande floodplain. Wetlands19:372-382.
70. US Department of the Interior.2004. Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary. USDI, Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Regional Office, Salt Lake City, Utah. Available at (Accessed 30 December 2008).
71. Vinson MR.2001.A history of aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblage changes downstream from a large dam. Ecological Applications11:711-730.
72. Webb RH.1996. Grand Canyon. A Century of Change. University of Arizona Press: Tucson, Az; p.320.
73. Williams CA, Cooper DJ.2005. Mechanisms of riparian cottonwood decline along regulated rivers. Ecosystems8:382-395.
74. Wolf EC, Cooper DJ, Hobbs NT.2007. Beaver, streamflow and elk influence willow establishment and floodplain stability on Yellowstone's northern range. Ecological Applications17:1572-1587.