Climate policy: Hard problem, soft thinking

Climatic Change

Volumn 110, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 507-521

  Wagner, Gernot ^a,b   Zeckhauser, Richard J ^c  

^a ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE POLICY; ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY; HARD PROBLEMS; HEART ATTACK; LOW-CARBON; MARKET FORCES; POLICY MAKERS; POLITICAL LEADERSHIP; PUBLIC AWARENESS; SHORT TERM; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION;

EXTRATERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERES; PLANETARY SURFACE ANALYSIS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; PSYCHOLOGY; STATE ROLE; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 84856218399     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0067-z     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2010) The environment and directed technical change. Working Paper, April 28.
2. Akerlof GA, Dickens WT (1982) The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. Am Econ Rev 72(3): 307-319.
3. Allcott H, Mullainathan S (2010) Behavior and energy policy. Science 327(5970): 1204-1205.
4. Bar-Eli M, Azar OH, Ritov I, Keidar-Levin Y, Schein G (2007) Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: the case of penalty kicks. J Econ Psychol 28(5): 606-621.
5. Barrett S (2007) Why cooperate? Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Berger A, Brown C, Kousky C, Zeckhauser R (2011) The challenge of degraded environments: how common biases impair effective policy. Risk Anal. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1539-6924. 2010. 01477. x.
7. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions (CRED) (2009) The psychology of climate change csommunication: a guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public. Columbia University, New York.
8. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (2009) Turn toward climate safety. (http://www. edf. org/documents/10483_Turn_Toward_Safety. pdf).
9. European Climate Foundation (ECF) (2010) Roadmap (2050) (www. roadmap2050. eu).
10. Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
11. Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859): 1243-1248.
12. Hatfield-Dodds S, Morrison M (2010) Confusing opportunity costs, losses and forgone gains: assessing the effect of communication bias on support for climate change policy in the United States and Australia. CCEP Working Paper 9. 10, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy, Australian National University.
13. Jaffe A, Newell R, Stavins R (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54: 164-174.
14. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1972) Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cogn Psychol 3(3): 430-454.
15. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263-292.
16. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. J Polit Econ 98(6): 1325-1348.
17. Kemeny J, (Comission Chair) et al. (1979) The need for change: the legacy of Three Mile Island. Report of the President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island.
18. Kousky C, Cooke R (2009) The unholy trinity: fat tails, tail dependence, and micro-correlations. RFF Working Paper 09-36.
19. Krosnick JA (2010) The climate majority. New York Times op-ed, June 8.
20. Leiserowitz A (2004) Before and after the day after tomorrow: a U. S. study of climate change risk perception. Environment 46(9): 22-37.
21. Leiserowitz A (2005) The international impact of the day after tomorrow. Environment 47(3): 41-44.
22. Lenton TM (2007) Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system. PNAS 105(6): 1786-1793.
23. McKinsey (2010) Unlocking energy efficiency in the U. S. economy. (www. mckinsey. com/usenergyefficiency).
24. Munger CT (2005) The psychology of human misjudgment. (Combined selections of three of Charles Munger's talks). (http://files. arunbansal. com/pdf/mungermisjudgment. pdf).
25. Murray BC, Newell RG, Pizer WA (2008) Balancing cost and emissions certainty: an allowance reserve for cap-and-trade. Rev Environ Econ Policy. doi: 10. 1093/reep/ren016.
26. Oppenheimer M, Todorov A (2006) Global warming: the psychology of long term risk. Clim Change 77: 1-6.
27. Patt A, Zeckhauser R (2000) Action bias and environmental decisions. J Risk Uncertain 21(1): 45-72.
28. Pigou AC (1912) Wealth and welfare. Macmillan Company, London.
29. Pooley E (2010) The climate war: true believers, power brokers, and the fight to save the earth. Hyperion, New York.
30. Raihani N, Aitken D (2011) Uncertainty, rationality and cooperation in the context of climate change. Clim Change. doi: 10. 1007/s10584-010-0014-4.
31. Sterman JD (2008) Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science 322: 532-533.
32. Stern N (2007) Stern review report on the economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Sterner T (2009) In defense of sensible economics. In: Touffut J-P (ed) Changing climate, changing economy. Edward Elgar, Cournot Centre for Economic Studies.
34. Summers L, Zeckhauser R (2008) Policymaking for posterity. J Risk Uncertain 37(2): 115-140.
35. Sunstein CR (2007) Worst-case scenarios. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
36. Sunstein CR, Zeckhauser R (2011) Overreaction to fearsome risks. Environ Resour Econ 48(3): 435-449.
37. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgments under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124-1131.
38. Weber E (2006) Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim Change 77: 103-120.
39. Weinstein ND (1980) Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(5): 806-820.
40. Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91(1): 1-19.
41. Weitzman ML (2010) GHG Targets as insurance against catastrophic climate damages. Working Paper, June 3, 2010.
42. Yohe G, Tol R (2007) Precaution and a dismal theorem: implications for climate policy and climate research. Working Paper FNU-145. Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, Hamburg.
43. Zeckhauser R, Viscusi KW (1990) Risk within reason. Science 248(4955): 559-564.