The Challenge of Degraded Environments: How Common Biases Impair Effective Policy

Risk Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1423-1433

  Berger, Alan ^a   Brown, Case ^b   Kousky, Carolyn ^c   Zeckhauser, Richard ^d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biases; Climate change; Decision making; Mining; Neglects; Reclamation

Indexed keywords

BIASES; DEGRADED SITES; ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MINING OPERATIONS; NATURAL SYSTEMS; NEGLECTS;

DECISION MAKING; DEGRADATION; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEMS; LAND RECLAMATION; MINING; RECLAMATION;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MINING; ORGANIZATION; UNITED STATES;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CANADA; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; MINING; UNITED STATES;

CANADA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80053417409     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01477.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Daily GC. Introduction: What are ecosystem services? In Daily GC (ed). Nature's Services. Washington, DC Island Press, 1997.
2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC Island Press, 2003.
3. Berger A, Brown C, Kaisky C, Zeckhauser R. The five neglects: Risks gone amiss. Pp. 83-99 in Kunreuther H, Useem M (eds). Learning from Catastrophes: Strategies for Reaction and Response. Philadelphia, PA Wharton School Publishing, 2010.
4. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991; 106(4):1039-1061.
5. Summers L, Zeckhauser R. Policymaking for posterity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2008; 37(2):115-140.
6. Raiffa H. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty. Reading, MA Addison-Wesley, 1968.
7. Savage LJ. Foundations of Statistics. New York Dover Publications, 1972.
8. Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science, 2005; 310:1628-1632.
9. Keohane N, Van Roy B, Zeckhauser R. Managing the quality of a resource with stock and flow controls. Journal of Public Economics, 2007; 91(3-4):541-569.
10. Buffet W. Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman's letter to shareholders, 1997 February 28. Available at:, Accessed July 28, 2010.
11. Weitzman ML. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009; 91(1):1-19.
12. Walters CJ, Holling CS. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 1990; 71(6):2060-2068.
13. Holling CS. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. London John Wiley and Sons, 1978.
14. Lee KN. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC Island Press, 1993.
15. Sunstein CR, Zeckhauser R. Overreaction to fearsome risks. Environmental and Resource Economics, forthcoming.
16. Sunstein CR. Probability neglect: Emotions, worst cases, and law. Yale Law Journal, 2002; 112(1):61-107.
17. Kuran T, Sunstein CR. Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review, 1999; 51(4):683-768.
18. Associated Press. BP Drill Plans Downplayed Risk of Rig Accident. 2010.
19. Kunreuther H, Meyer R, Zeckhauser R, Slovic P, Schwortz B, Schade C et al. High stakes decision making: Normative, descriptive and prescriptive considerations. Marketing Letters, 2002; 13(3):259-268.
20. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 1973; 5:207-232.
21. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988; 1:7-59.
22. Chazdon RL. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science, 2008; 320:1458-1460.
23. Taleb NN. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York Random House, 2007.
24. U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Geological Survey. 2006 Minerals Yearbook: Mining and Quarrying Trends. Washington, DC U.S. Geological Survey, 2008.
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NIOSH Fact Sheet: NIOSH Recommendations for Limiting Potential Exposures of Workers to Asbestos Associated with Vermiculite from Libby, Montana in DHHS (NIOSH), Publication Number 2003-141; Online at: Washington, DC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003.
26. U.S. EPA. EPA's actions concerning asbestos-contaminated vermiculite in Libby, Montana. Washington, DC United States Environmetnal Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, 2001.
27. Hanson AB. W.R. Grace Settles Asbestos Claims for $3 Billion. Helena, MT Associated Press, 2008.
28. Supreme Court of the United States, W. R. Grace & Co., Kootenai Development Corporation, and W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. v. United States of America. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for Writ of Certiorari.Available at: 2006. Accessed on October 20, 2009.
29. U.S. EPA. News Release: W.R. Grace and Executives, Charged with Endangering Libby, Montana Community, Fraud, and Obstruction of Justice. Washington, DC, 2005.
30. Carroll SJ, Hensler DR, Gross J, Slass EM, Schonlau M, Abrachamse A et al. Asbestos Litigation. Santa Monica, CA Rand Institute for Civil Justice, 2005.
31. Peacock A. Libby, Montana: Asbestos and the Deadly Silence of an American Corporation. Boulder, CO Johnson Books, 2003.
32. Johnson K, C. Chemical company is acquitted in asbestos case. New York Times, May 9, 2009.
33. Freeman PS. An industry perspective on mining in New Mexico. P. 85 in Price LG, et al (eds). Mining in New Mexico-The Environment, Water, Economics and Sustainable Development: Decision-Makers Field Guide. Socorro, NM New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2005.
34. U.S. Geological Survey. The Mineral Industry of Montanta, in Minerals Yearbook (Volume II. - Area Reports: Domestic). Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996.
35. McCullough W. Financial assurance and bonding: What happens when bankruptcy hits. In Price LG, et al. (eds). Mining in New Mexico-The Environment, Water, Economics and Sustainable Development: Decision-Makers Field Guide, Socorro, NM New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2005.
36. Energy Information Administration. Petroleum Supply Monthly: January 2010. Washington, DC Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas, Department of Energy, 2010.
37. Alberta Department of Energy (2007) Alberta's Oil Sands. Edmonton, Alberta Alberta Department of Energy, 2006.
38. Squire AJ, Westbrook CJ, Dube MG. An approach for assessing cumulative effects in a model river, the Athabasca River Basin. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2009; 6(1):119-134.
39. Syncrude Oil Sands Mine, Alberta, CA, February 23, 2010. Available at:, Accessed July 28, 2010.
40. Jones J. Syncrude duck deaths now triple initial tally. Reuters, March 31, 2009.
41. Vanderklippe N. Scientists seek truth on oil sands damage. Globe and Mail, October 10, 2009.
42. U.S. EPA. Action Memorandum (AM) Fact Sheet on Selected Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) Alternative Kingston Fossil Fuel Plant Release Site. Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010.
43. Ferguson GP, Rudolph DL, Barker JF. Hydrodynamics of a large oil sand tailings impoundment and related environmental implications. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009; 46(12):1446-1460.
44. Mansfield D. Cleaning Tenn. spill could cost $825m. Knoxville, TN Associated Press, 2009.
45. Jones M. Reclaiming reality. This Magazine, Jan-Feb, 2009.
46. Hildebrand J. Reclamation illusions in oil sands country. Parkland Post, 2009; 11(2). Available at Accessed July 28, 2010.
47. Stern N. Economics must be at the heart of any discussion of how to fight climate change. Boston Review, January/February, 2007.
48. Camerer CF, Kunreuther H. Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1989; 8(4):565-592.
49. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979; 47(2):263-292.
50. Kousky C, Rostapshova O, Toman MA, Zeckhauser R. Responding to the threats of climate change mega-catastrophes. In RFF Discussion Paper 09-45. Washington, DC Resources for the Future, 2009.
51. Keith DW. Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 2000; 25(1):245-284.
52. Berger A (ed). Designing the Reclaimed Landscape. New York Taylor and Francis, 2008.
53. Berger A. Reclaiming the American West. New York Princeton Architectural Press, 2002.