Comparison of mechanical behaviors of enamel rod and interrod regions in enamel

Journal of Materials Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 448-456

  Ang, Siang Fung ^a   Saadatmand, Mahnaz ^a   Swain, Michael V ^b,c   Klocke, Arndt ^d,e   Schneider, Gerold A ^a  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biological; Nanoindentation; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL; CONSTANT LOADS; CRYSTALLITE ORIENTATION; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; ORGANIC CONTENT; SPHERICAL INDENTATIONS; STRESS RELAXATION BEHAVIOR; TIME-DEPENDENT PROPERTIES;

ENERGY DISSIPATION; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOINDENTATION; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOSITY;

ENAMELS;

EID: 84856145627     PISSN: 08842914     EISSN: 20445326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2011.409     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. K.E. Healy: Dentin and enamel, in Handbook of Biomaterials Properties, edited by J. Black and G. Hastings (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995), p. 25.
2. P.D. Frazier: Adult human enamel: An electron microscopic study of crystallite size and morphology. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 22, 1 (1968).
3. G. Daculsi and B. Kerebel: High-resolution electron microscope study of human enamel crystallites: Size, shape, and growth. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 65, 163 (1978).
4. H. Gray, L.H. Bannister, M.M. Berry, and P.L. Williams: Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Medicine & Surgery, 38th ed. (Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1995), p. 1710.
5. A. Nanci: Ten Cate's Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function (Mosby, St Louis, 2003).
6. D. Bajaj and D.D. Arola: On the R-curve behavior of human tooth enamel. Biomaterials 30, 4037 (2009).
7. M.J. Glimcher, E.J. Daniel, D.F. Travis, and S. Kamhi: Electron optical and x-ray diffraction studies of the organization of the inorganic crystals in embryonic bovine enamel. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 50, 1 (1965).
8. M.C. Maas and E.R. Dumont: Built to last: The structure, function and evolution of primate dental enamel. Evol. Anthropol. 8, 133 (1999).
9. C.R. Carlisle, C. Coulais, and M. Guthold: The mechanical stress-strain properties of single electrospun collagen type I nanofibers. Acta Biomater. 6, 2997 (2010).
10. S. Habelitz, S.J. Marshall, G.W. Marshall Jr., and M. Balooch: Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometer scale. Arch. Oral Biol. 46, 173 (2001).
11. J. Ge, F.Z. Cui, X.M. Wang, and H.L. Feng: Property variations in the prism and the organic sheath within enamel by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 26, 3333 (2005).
12. M. Oyen and R.F. Cook: A practical guide for analysis of nanoindentation data. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2(4), 396 (2009).
13. J. Mencik, L.H. He, and M.V. Swain: Determination of viscoelastic- plastic material parameters of biomaterials by instrumented indentation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2, 318 (2009).
14. M.L. Oyen: Spherical indentation creep following ramp loading. J. Mater. Res. 20(8), 2094 (2005).
15. M.L. Oyen and R.F. Cook: Load-displacement behavior during sharp indentation of viscous-elastic-plastic materials. J. Mater. Res. 18(1), 139 (2003).
16. S.E. Olesiak, M.L. Oyen, and V.L. Ferguson: Viscous-elasticplastic behavior of bone using Berkovich nanoindentation. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 14, 111 (2010).
17. H.R. Hertz: Miscellaneous Papers (Macmillan, London, 1896).
18. J.S. Field and M.V. Swain: A simple predictive model for spherical indentation. J. Mater. Res. 8, 297 (1993).
19. W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).
20. L.H. He and M.V. Swain: Energy absorption characterization of human enamel using nanoindentation. J. Biomat. Mater. Res. 81, 484 (2007).
21. E.H. Lee and J.R.M. Radok: The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. J. Appl. Mech. 27, 438 (1960).
22. K.L. Johnson: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).
23. M.L. Oyen: Analytical techniques for indentation of viscoelastic materials. Philos. Mag. 86, 5625 (2006).
24. M. Sakai and S. Shimizu: Indentation rheometry for glass-forming materials. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 282, 236 (2001).
25. L.H. He and M.V. Swain: Nanoindentation creep behavior of human enamel. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 91, 352 (2009).
26. G. Williams and D.C. Watts: Non-symmetrical dielectric relaxation behavior arising from a simple empirical decay function. Trans. Faraday Soc. 66, 80 (1970).
27. K.L. Dorrington: The theory of viscoelasticity in biomaterials. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 34, 289 (1980).
28. S.F. Ang, E.L. Bortel, M.V. Swain, A. Klocke, and G.A. Schneider: Size-dependent elastic/inelastic behavior of enamel over millimeter and nanometer length scales. Biomaterials 31, 1955 (2010).
29. S. Habelitz, G.W. Marshall, M. Balooch, and S.J. Marshall: Nanoindentation and storage of teeth. J. Biomech. 35(7), 995 (2002).
30. B. Viswanath, R. Raghavan, U. Ramamurty, and N. Ravishankar: Mechanical properties and anisotropy in hydroxyapatite single crystals. Scr. Mater. 57, 361 (2007).
31. L. Dougan, A.S. Koti, G. Genchev, H. Lu, and J.M. Fernandez: A single-molecule perspective on the role of solvent hydrogen bonds in protein folding and chemical reactions. ChemPhysChem. 9, 2836 (2008).
32. J. Zhang, M.M. Michalenko, E. Kuhl, and T.C. Ovaert: Characterization of indentation response and stiffness reduction of bone using a continuum damage model. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 3, 189 (2010).
33. L.H. He and M.V. Swain: Influence of environment on the mechanical behaviour of mature human enamel. Biomaterials 28, 4512 (2007).
34. G.A. Schneider, L.H. He, and M.V. Swain: Viscous flow model of creep in enamel. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 014701 (2008).