Energy absorption characterization of human enamel using nanoindentation

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 484-492

  Li, Hong He ^a   Swain, Michael V ^a  

^a Faculty of Dentistry University of Sydney   (Australia)

Author keywords

Enamel; Energy loss; Nanoindentation; Work of indentation

Indexed keywords

CERAMIC MATERIALS; ENAMELS; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FUSED SILICA; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOCRYSTALS; NANOINDENTATION; PROTEINS; TOUGHNESS;

INDENTER PENETRATION; INELASTIC RESPONSE; LOADING RATES; SHEATH STRUCTURE;

ENERGY ABSORPTION;

HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOCRYSTAL; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; ELASTICITY; ENAMEL; ENERGY ABSORPTION; FORCE; HUMAN; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNIQUE; YOUNG MODULUS;

BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DURAPATITE; ELASTICITY; ENERGY METABOLISM; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 34247552313     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31051     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Rensberger JM. Mechanical adaptation in enamel. Rotterdam, The Netherlands:Balkema; 1997. pp 237-257.
2. Maas MC, Dumont ER. Built to last: The structure, function, and evolution of primate dental enamel. Evol Anthropol 1999;8:133-152.
3. Paine ML, White SN, Luoa W, Fongc H, Sarikayac M, Sneada ML. Regulated gene expression dictates enamel structure and tooth function. Matrix Biol 2001;20:273-292.
4. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartaglia CM. Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent 2004;32:451-457.
5. Fernandes CP, Glantz POJ, Svensson SA, Bergmark A. A novel sensor for bite force determinations. Dent Mater 2003;19:118-126.
6. Spears IR. A three-dimensional finite element model of prismatic enamel: A re-appraisal of the data on the Young's modulus of enamel. J Dent Res 1997;76:1690-1697.
7. Spears IR, van Noort R, Crompton RH, Cardew GE, Howard IC. The effects of enamel anisotropy on the distribution of stress in a tooth. J Dent Res 1993;72:1526-1531.
8. White SN, Luo W, Paine ML, Fong H, Sarikaya M, Snead ML. Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum toughens and controls anistropy in human enamel. J Dent Res 2001;80:321-327.
9. Xu HHK, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, Romberg E, Kelly JR, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1998;77:472-480.
10. Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Balooch M. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:173-183.
11. Ge J, Cui FZ, Wang XM, Feng HL. Property variations in the prism and the organic sheath within enamel by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 2005;26:3333-3339.
12. Cuy JL, Mann AB, Livi KJ, Teaford MF, Weihs TP. Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2002;47:281-291.
13. Fox P. The toughness of tooth enamel, a natural fibrous composite. J Mater Sci 1980;15:3113-3121.
14. Staines M, Robinson WH, Hood JAA. Spherical indentation of tooth enamel. J Mater Sci 1981;16:2551-2556.
15. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 1992;7:1564-1583.
16. He LH, Swain MV. Nanoindentation derived stress-strain properties of dental materials. Dent Mater. In press.
17. Lawn BR. Indentation of ceramics with spheres: A century after hertz. J Am Ceram Soc 1998;81:1977-1994.
18. Tabor D. Hardness of Metals. Oxford:Clarendon Press; 1951.
19. He LH, Fujisawa N, Swain MV. Elastic modulus and stress-strain response of human enamel by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 2006;27:4388-4398.
20. Fischer-Cripps AC. Nanoindentation. New York:Springer; 2002. pp 53-55.
21. Sakai M. Energy principle of the indentation-induced inelastic surface deformation and hardness of brittle materials. Acta Metall Mater 1993;41:1751-1758.
22. Suganuma M, Swain MV. Simple method and critical comparison of frame compliance and indenter area function for nanoindentation. J Mater Res 2004;19:3490-3502.
23. Stilwell NA, Tabor D. Elastic recovery of conical indentations. Proc Phys Soc 1961;78:169-179.
24. Poolthong S. Determination of the mechanical properties of enamel, dentine and cementum by an ultra micro-indentation system. PhD Thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney; 1998.
25. Inage T, Shimokawa H, Teranishi Y, Iwase T, Toda Y, Moro I. Immunocytochemical demonstration of amelogenins and enamelins secreted by ameloblasts during the secrectory and maturation stages. Arch Histol Cytol 1989;52:213-229.
26. Hu C-C, Fukae M, Uchida T. Sheathalin: Cloning, cDNA polypeptide sequences, and immunolocalization of porcine enamel sheath proteins. J Dent Res 1997;76:648-657.
27. Boyde A, Martin LB. The microstructure of promate dental enamel. New York:Plenum; 1984. pp 341-367.
28. Moreno EC, Zahradnik RT. The pore structure of human dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1973;18:1063-1068.
29. Rief M, Gautel M, Oesterhelt F, Fernandez JM, Gaub HE. Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. Science 1997;276:1109-1112.
30. Smith BL, Schaffer TE, Viani M, Thompson JB, Frederick NA, Kindt J, Belchers A, Stucky GD, Morse DE, Hansma PK. Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites. Nature 1999;399:761-763.
31. Thompson JB, Kindt JH, Drake B, Hansma HG, Morse DE, Hansma PK. Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time. Nature 2001;414:773-775.
32. Fantner GE, Hassenkam T, Kindt JH, Weaver JC, Birkedal H, Pechenik L, Cutroni JA, Cidade GAG, Stucky GD, Morse DE, Hansma PK. Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separates during bone fracture. Nat Mater 2005;4:612-615.
33. Macho GA, Jiang Y, Spears IR. Enamel microstructure - A truly three-dimensional structure. J Hum Evol 2003;45:81-90.
34. Radlanski RJ, Renz H, Willersinn U, Cordis CA, Duschner H. Outline and arrangement of enamel rods in human deciduous and permanent enamel. 3D-reconstructions obtained from CLSM and SEM images based on serial ground sections. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:409-414.