Argumentation as Rational Persuasion

Argumentation

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-81

  Blair, J Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Advertising; Argument; Decision making; Inquiry; Persuasion; Problem solving; Rational persuasion

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856109482     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9235-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Barry, A. M. 1997. Visual intelligence: Perception, image and manipulation in visual communications. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2. Biro, J., and H. Siegel. 2006. In defense of the objective epistemic approach to argumentation. Informal Logic 26(1): 91-101.
3. Blair, J. A. 2004. Argument and its uses. Informal Logic 24(2): 137-151.
4. Govier, Trudy. 2001. A practical study of argument, 5th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
5. Johnson, R. H. 2000. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Kock, C. 2007. Norms of legitimate dissensus. Informal Logic 27(2): 179-196.
7. Lumer, C. 2005. The epistemological theory of argument-how and why? Informal Logic 25(3): 213-243.
8. O'Keefe, D. J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
9. Perelman, Ch., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric, A treatise on argumentation (trans: Wilkinson, J., Weaver, P.). Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
10. Pinto, R. C. 2010. The use of argument in communicative contexts. Argumentation 24(2): 227-252.
11. Reboul, O. 1991. Introduction à la rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
12. van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.
13. van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.