The uses of argument in communicative contexts

Argumentation

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 227-252

  Pinto, Robert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Communicative context; Making manifest; Persuasion; Reasons

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954083159     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-009-9174-7     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blair, Anthony J. 2003. Towards a philosophy of argument. In J. A. Blair et al. Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference. CD-ROM. Windsor: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
2. Brandom, Robert B. 1994. Making it explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Bratman, M. E. 1999. Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, L. J. 1992. An essay on belief and acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Davidson, Donald. 1963/2001. Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60. Reprinted in Davidson 2001, pp. 3-19. Page references are to Davidson 2001.
7. Davidson, Donald. 2001. Essays on action and events, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Dennett, Daniel C. 1978. Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Goodwin, Jean. 1999. Good argumentation without resolution. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference of the ISSA (Sic Sat, 1999), ed. van Eemeren et al., 255-259.
10. Goodwin, Jean. 2002. Designing issues. In Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 81-96. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Goodwin, Jean. 2007. Argument has no function. Informal Logic 27 (1): 69-90.
12. Johnson, R. H. 2000. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum.
13. Johnson, R. H., and J. A. Blair. 1977. Logical self-defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill-Ryerson.
14. Kauffeld, Frederick J. 1998. Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing. Argumentation 12: 245-266.
15. Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary. 1993. Springfield: Merriam-Webster.
16. O'Keefe, D. J. 1982. The concepts of argument and arguing. In Advances in argumentation theory and research, ed. J. R. Cox and C. A. Willard, 3-23. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
17. O'Keefe, D. J. 1996. Argumentation theory and dual-process models of persuasion. In Logic and argumentation, ed. J. van Benthem, F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, and F. Veltman, 61-76. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
18. O'Keefe, D. J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
19. Pinto, R. C. 2001. Argument, inference and dialectic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
20. Pinto, R. C. 2003a. Truth and premiss adequacy. In Argumentation and its applications (CD-ROM), ed. Hans V. Hansen, et al. Windsor: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
21. Pinto, R. C. 2003b. Reasons. In Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation, ed. Frans van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, 3-15. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. Pinto, R. C. 2006. Evaluating inferences: the nature and role of warrants. Informal Logic 26 (3): 287-317.
23. Pinto, R. C. 2007. Burdens of rejoinder. In Reason reclaimed, ed. Hans V. Hansen and R. C. Pinto, 75-88. Newport News: Vale Press.
24. Pinto, R. C. 2009. Argumentation and the force of reasons. Informal Logic 29 (3): 263-297.
25. Pollock, J. L. 1995. Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge: MIT.
26. Rescher, Nicholas. 1988. Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27. Siegel, Harvey. 1988. Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education. New York: Routledge.
28. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Gootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrect: Foris.
30. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Gootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Gootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Gootendorst, Sally Jachson, and Scott Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
33. van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Gootendorst, et al. 1996. Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Malwah: Erlbaum.
34. Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue. Albany: SUNY Press.