The prosensory function of Sox2 in the chicken inner ear relies on the direct regulation of Aoh1

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Neves, Joana ^a   Uchikawa, Masanori ^b   Bigas, Anna ^c   Giraldez, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA GALACTOSIDE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN ATOH1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BASIC HELIX LOOP HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ATOH1 GENE; CELL FATE; CELL STRAIN HEK293; CHICKEN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYO; ENHANCER REGION; ENZYME INHIBITION; GENE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; HAIR CELL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; STEADY STATE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHICK EMBRYO; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; GENETICS; HEARING; INNER EAR; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SENSATION; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; EAR, INNER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY, INNER; HEARING; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; SENSATION; SOXB1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; STEM CELLS; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 84856103051     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030871     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bermingham NA, Hassan BA, Price SD, Vollrath MA, Ben-Arie N, et al. (1999) Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science 284: 1837-1841.
2. Zheng JL, Gao WQ, (2000) Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner ears. Nat Neurosci 3: 580-586.
3. Woods C, Montcouquiol M, Kelley MW, (2004) Math1 regulates development of the sensory epithelium in the mammalian cochlea. Nat Neurosci 7: 1310-1318.
4. Helms AW, Abney AL, Ben-Arie N, Zoghbi HY, Johnson JE, (2000) Autoregulation and multiple enhancers control Math1 expression in the developing nervous system. Development 127: 1185-1196.
5. Raft S, Koundakjian EJ, Quinones H, Jayasena CS, Goodrich LV, et al. (2007) Cross-regulation of Ngn1 and Math1 coordinates the production of neurons and sensory hair cells during inner ear development. Development 134: 4405-4415.
6. Matei V, Pauley S, Kaing S, Rowitch D, Beisel KW, et al. (2005) Smaller inner ear sensory epithelia in Neurog 1 null mice are related to earlier hair cell cycle exit. Dev Dyn 234: 633-650.
7. Jones JM, Montcouquiol M, Dabdoub A, Woods C, Kelley MW, (2006) Inhibitors of differentiation and DNA binding (Ids) regulate Math1 and hair cell formation during the development of the organ of Corti. J Neurosci 26: 550-558.
8. Jahan I, Pan N, Kersigo J, Fritzsch B, (2010) Neurod1 suppresses hair cell differentiation in ear ganglia and regulates hair cell subtype development in the cochlea. PLoS One 5: e11661.
9. Kamaid A, Neves J, Giraldez F, (2010) Id gene regulation and function in the prosensory domains of the chicken inner ear: a link between Bmp signaling and Atoh1. J Neurosci 30: 11426-11434.
10. Zine A, de Ribaupierre F, (2002) Notch/Notch ligands and Math1 expression patterns in the organ of Corti of wild-type and Hes1 and Hes5 mutant mice. Hear Res 170: 22-31.
11. Doetzlhofer A, Basch ML, Ohyama T, Gessler M, Groves AK, et al. (2009) Hey2 regulation by FGF provides a Notch-independent mechanism for maintaining pillar cell fate in the organ of Corti. Dev Cell 16: 58-69.
12. Tateya T, Imayoshi I, Tateya I, Ito J, Kageyama R, (2011) Cooperative functions of Hes/Hey genes in auditory hair cell and supporting cell development. Dev Biol 352: 329-340.
13. Uchikawa M, Kamachi Y, Kondoh H, (1999) Two distinct subgroups of Group B Sox genes for transcriptional activators and repressors: their expression during embryonic organogenesis of the chicken. Mech Dev 84: 103-120.
14. Nowling TK, Johnson LR, Wiebe MS, Rizzino A, (2000) Identification of the transactivation domain of the transcription factor Sox-2 and an associated co-activator. J Biol Chem 275: 3810-3818.
15. Neves J, Kamaid A, Alsina B, Giraldez F, (2007) Differential expression of Sox2 and Sox3 in neuronal and sensory progenitors of the developing inner ear of the chick. J Comp Neurol 503: 487-500.
16. Mak AC, Szeto IY, Fritzsch B, Cheah KS, (2009) Differential and overlapping expression pattern of SOX2 and SOX9 in inner ear development. Gene Expr Patterns 9: 444-453.
17. Hume CR, Bratt DL, Oesterle EC, (2007) Expression of LHX3 and SOX2 during mouse inner ear development. Gene Expr Patterns 7: 798-807.
18. Kiernan AE, Pelling AL, Leung KK, Tang AS, Bell DM, et al. (2005) Sox2 is required for sensory organ development in the mammalian inner ear. Nature 434: 1031-1035.
19. Puligilla C, Dabdoub A, Brenowitz SD, Kelley MW, (2010) Sox2 induces neuronal formation in the developing mammalian cochlea. J Neurosci 30: 714-722.
20. Neves J, Parada C, Chamizo M, Giraldez F, (2011) Jagged 1 regulates the restriction of Sox2 expression in the developing chicken inner ear: a mechanism for sensory organ specification. Development 138: 735-744.
21. Dabdoub A, Puligilla C, Jones JM, Fritzsch B, Cheah KS, et al. (2008) Sox2 signaling in prosensory domain specification and subsequent hair cell differentiation in the developing cochlea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 18396-18401.
22. Pevny LH, Sockanathan S, Placzek M, Lovell-Badge R, (1998) A role for SOX1 in neural determination. Development 125: 1967-1978.
23. Bylund M, Andersson E, Novitch BG, Muhr J, (2003) Vertebrate neurogenesis is counteracted by Sox1-3 activity. Nat Neurosci 6: 1162-1168.
24. Graham V, Khudyakov J, Ellis P, Pevny L, (2003) SOX2 functions to maintain neural progenitor identity. Neuron 39: 749-765.
25. Uchikawa M, Ishida Y, Takemoto T, Kamachi Y, Kondoh H, (2003) Functional analysis of chicken Sox2 enhancers highlights an array of diverse regulatory elements that are conserved in mammals. Dev Cell 4: 509-519.
26. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL, (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Dev Dyn 195: 231-272.
27. Chang W, Lin Z, Kulessa H, Hebert J, Hogan BL, et al. (2008) Bmp4 is essential for the formation of the vestibular apparatus that detects angular head movements. PLoS Genet 4: e1000050.
28. Robert-Moreno A, Guiu J, Ruiz-Herguido C, Lopez ME, Ingles-Esteve J, et al. (2008) Impaired embryonic haematopoiesis yet normal arterial development in the absence of the Notch ligand Jagged1. EMBO J 27: 1886-1895.
29. Ebert PJ, Timmer JR, Nakada Y, Helms AW, Parab PB, et al. (2003) Zic1 represses Math1 expression via interactions with the Math1 enhancer and modulation of Math1 autoregulation. Development 130: 1949-1959.
30. Timmer J, Johnson J, Niswander L, (2001) The use of in ovo electroporation for the rapid analysis of neural-specific murine enhancers. Genesis 29: 123-132.
31. Pujades C, Kamaid A, Alsina B, Giraldez F, (2006) BMP-signaling regulates the generation of hair-cells. Dev Biol 292: 55-67.
32. Li S, Mark S, Radde-Gallwitz K, Schlisner R, Chin MT, et al. (2008) Hey2 functions in parallel with Hes1 and Hes5 for mammalian auditory sensory organ development. BMC Dev Biol 8: 20.
33. Alon U, (2007) Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 8: 450-461.
34. Jeon SJ, Fujioka M, Kim SC, Edge AS, (2011) Notch signaling alters sensory or neuronal cell fate specification of inner ear stem cells. J Neurosci 31: 8351-8358.
35. Cimadamore F, Fishwick K, Giusto E, Gnedeva K, Cattarossi G, et al. Human ESC-derived neural crest model reveals a key role for SOX2 in sensory neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 8: 538-551.
36. Pevny L, Placzek M, (2005) SOX genes and neural progenitor identity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 7-13.
37. Sweet EM, Vemaraju S, Riley BB, Sox2 and Fgf interact with Atoh1 to promote sensory competence throughout the zebrafish inner ear. Dev Biol 358: 113-121.
38. Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S, Spivakov M, Jorgensen HF, et al. (2006) Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat Cell Biol 8: 532-538.
39. Fischer A, Gessler M, (2007) Delta-Notch-and then? Protein interactions and proposed modes of repression by Hes and Hey bHLH factors. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 4583-4596.
40. Iso T, Kedes L, Hamamori Y, (2003) HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol 194: 237-255.
41. Benezra R, Davis RL, Lockshon D, Turner DL, Weintraub H, (1990) The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell 61: 49-59.
42. Norton JD, (2000) ID helix-loop-helix proteins in cell growth, differentiation and tumorigenesis. J Cell Sci 113 (Pt22): 3897-3905.
43. Hayashi T, Kokubo H, Hartman BH, Ray CA, Reh TA, et al. (2008) Hesr1 and Hesr2 may act as early effectors of Notch signaling in the developing cochlea. Dev Biol 316: 87-99.
44. Taranova OV, Magness ST, Fagan BM, Wu Y, Surzenko N, et al. (2006) SOX2 is a dose-dependent regulator of retinal neural progenitor competence. Genes Dev 20: 1187-1202.
45. Chakravarthy H, Boer B, Desler M, Mallanna SK, McKeithan TW, et al. (2008) Identification of DPPA4 and other genes as putative Sox2:Oct-3/4 target genes using a combination of in silico analysis and transcription-based assays. J Cell Physiol 216: 651-662.
46. Adam J, Myat A, Le Roux I, Eddison M, Henrique D, et al. (1998) Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development. Development 125: 4645-4654.
47. Bell D, Streit A, Gorospe I, Varela-Nieto I, Alsina B, et al. (2008) Spatial and temporal segregation of auditory and vestibular neurons in the otic placode. Dev Biol 322: 109-120.
48. Abello G, Khatri S, Radosevic M, Scotting PJ, Giraldez F, et al. (2010) Independent regulation of Sox3 and Lmx1b by FGF and BMP signaling influences the neurogenic and non-neurogenic domains in the chick otic placode. Dev Biol 339: 166-178.
49. Ma Q, Anderson DJ, Fritzsch B, (2000) Neurogenin 1 null mutant ears develop fewer, morphologically normal hair cells in smaller sensory epithelia devoid of innervation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1: 129-143.
50. Alsina B, Abello G, Ulloa E, Henrique D, Pujades C, et al. (2004) FGF signaling is required for determination of otic neuroblasts in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 267: 119-134.
51. Satoh T, Fekete DM, (2005) Clonal analysis of the relationships between mechanosensory cells and the neurons that innervate them in the chicken ear. Development 132: 1687-1697.
52. Sandberg M, Kallstrom M, Muhr J, (2005) Sox21 promotes the progression of vertebrate neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci 8: 995-1001.